Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of bacteria from deep subsurface sediment and adjacent groundwater

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Samples of groundwater and the enclosing sediments were compared for densities of bacteria using direct (acridine orange direct staining) and viable (growth on 1% PTYG medium) count methodology. Sediments to a depth of 550 m were collected from boreholes at three sites on the Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina, using techniques to insure a minimum of surface contamination. Clusters of wells screened at discreet intervals were established at each site. Bacterial densities in sediment were higher, by both direct and viable count, than in groundwater samples. Differences between direct and viable counts were much greater for groundwater samples than for sediment samples. Densities of bacteria in sediment ranged from less than 1.00×106 bacteria/g dry weight (gdw) up to 5.01 ×108 bacteria/gdw for direct counts, while viable counts were less than 1.00×103 CFU/gdw to 4.07×107 CFU/gdw. Bacteria densities in groundwater were 1.00×103–6.31×104 bacteria/ml and 5.75–4.57×102 CFU/ml for direct and viable counts, respectively. Isolates from sediment were also found to assimilate a wider variety of carbon compounds than groundwater bacteria. The data suggest that oligotrophic aquifer sediments have unique and dense bacterial communities that are attached and not reflected in groundwater found in the strata. Effective in situ bioremediation of contaimination in these aquifers may require sampling and characterization of sediment communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balkwill DL (1989) Numbers, diversity, and morphological characteristics of aerobic, chemoheterotrophic bacteria in deep subsurface sediments from a site in South Carolina. Geomicrobiol J 7:33–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balkwill DL, Ghiorse WC (1985) Characterization of subsurface bacteria associated with two shallow aquifers in Oklahoma. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:580–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balkwill DL, Fredrickson JK, Thomas JM (1989) Vertical and horizontal variations in the physiological diversity of the aerobic chemoheterotrophic bacterial microflora in deep southeast coastal plain subsurface sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1058–1065

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartha R, Bossert I (1984) The treatment and disposal of petroleum wastes. In: Atlas R (ed) Petroleum microbiology. Macmillan, New York, pp 553–577

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bone TL, Balkwill DL (1988) Morphological and cultural comparison of microorganisms in surface soil and subsurface sediments at a pristine study site in Oklahoma. Microb Ecol 16: 49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brockman FJ, Donovan BA, Hicks RJ Fredrickson JK (1989) Isolation and characterization of quinoline-degrading bacteria from subsurface sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1029–1032

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Craun GF (1986) Waterborne diseases in the United States. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fliermans CB (1989) Microbial life in the terrestrial subsurface of southeastern coastal plain sediments. Haz Was Haz Mat 6:155–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fliermans CB, Balkwill DL (1989) Microbial life in deep terrestrial subsurfaces. BioScience 39:370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fliermans CB, Phelps TJ, Ringelberg D, Mikell AT, White DC (1988) Mineralization of trichloroethylene by heterotrophic enrichment cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1709–1714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fredrickson JK, Garland TR, Hicks RJ, Thomas JM, Li SW, McFadden KM (1989) Lithotrophic and heterotrophic bacteria in deep subsurface sediments and their relation to sediment properties. Geomicrobiol J 7:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fredrickson JK, Hicks RJ, Li SW Brockman FJ (1988) Plasmid incidence in bacteria from deep subsurface sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2916–2923

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghiorse WC, Wilson JT (1988) Microbial ecology of the terrestrial subsurface. Adv Appl Microbiol 33:107–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harvey RW, George LH (1987) Growth determination for unattached bacteria in a contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2992–2996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey RW, Smith RL, George LH (1984) Effect of organic contamination upon microbial distributions and heterotrophic uptake in a Cape Cod, Mass., aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:1197–1202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hicks RJ, Fredrickson JM (1989) Aerobic metabolic metabolic potential of microbial populations indigenous to deep subsurface environments. Geomicrobiol J 7: 67–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33: 1225–1228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jannasch HW, Jones GE (1959) Bacterial populations in sea water as determined by different methods of enumeration. Limnol Oceanogr 4: 128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiménez L (1990) DNA comparison of deep terrestrial subsurface bacteria isolated from different geological and hydrological strata. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 2108–2113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kölbel-Boelke J, Tienken B, Nehrkorn A (1988) Microbial communities in the saturated groundwater environment. I. Methods of isolation and characterization of heterotrophic bacteria. Microb Ecol 16: 17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kölbel-Boelke J, Anders E, Nehrkorn A (1988) Microbial communities in the saturated groundwater environment. II. Diversity of bacterial communities in a Pleistocene sand aquifer and their in vitro activities. Microb Ecol 16: 31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. López-Torres AJ, Prieto L, Hazen TC (1988) Comparison of the in situ survival and activity ofKlebsiella pneumoniae andEscherichia coli in tropical marine environments. Microb Ecol 15: 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patrick R, Ford E, Luarles J (1983) Groundwater contamination in the United States, 2nd ed. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Phelps TJ, Fliermans CB, Garland TR, Phiffner SM, White DC (1989) Methods for recovery of deep terrestrial subsurface sediments for microbiological studies. J Microbiol Meth 9: 267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poindexter J (1981) Oligotrophy: Fast and famine existence. Adv Microb Ecol 5: 63–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roszak DB, Colwell RR (1987) Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment. Microbiol Rev 51: 365–379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sargent KA, Fliermans CB (1989) Geology and hydrology of the deep subsurface microbiology sampling sites at the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina. Geomicrobiol J 7: 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sinclair JL, Ghiorse WC (1989) Distribution of aerobic bacteria, protozoa, algae, and fungi in deep subsurface sediments. Geomicrobiol J 7: 15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tunlid A, Ringelberg D, Phelps TJ, Low C, White DC (1989) Measurement of phospholipid fatty acids at picomolar concentrations in biofilms and deep subsurface sediments using gas chromatography and chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J Microbiol Meth 10: 139–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Upton AC, Nedwell DB (1989) Nutritional flexibility of oligotrophic and copiotrophic Antarctica bacteria with respect to organic substrates. FEMS Microb Ecol 62: 1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Luis Jiménez

    Present address: Center for Environmental Biotechnology, University of Tennessee, 10515 Research Drive, 37932, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA

  2. Geralyne López de Victoria

    Present address: Department of Biology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Sciences Section, Savannah River Laboratory, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, 29808, Aiken, South Carolina, USA

    Terry C. Hazen, Luis Jiménez, Geralyne López de Victoria & Carl B. Fliermans

Authors
  1. Terry C. Hazen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis Jiménez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Geralyne López de Victoria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carl B. Fliermans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hazen, T.C., Jiménez, L., López de Victoria, G. et al. Comparison of bacteria from deep subsurface sediment and adjacent groundwater. Microb Ecol 22, 293–304 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540231

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540231

Keywords

Search

Navigation