Skip to main content
Log in

Image layer characteristics of the PC 1000 (mark II)

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate empirically the image layer characteristics of the PC 1000 Mark II. Radiographs were taken of a lead resolution grid positioned at 1 mm increments along angular intervals of the projected x-ray beam. The receptor was T-Mat G film combined with Lanex Regular Screens. The path of the effective rotation center was determined using a film positioned horizontally at right angles to the slit beam. The vertical magnification factor, horizontal magnification and Distortion Index, corrected for the position of the tomographic layer, were calculated using a reference object placed at various resolution limits of the image layer. The beam projection angle was compared to the average dental arch shape and proximal contact angle.

The maximum resolution observed at the central plane of the image layer was 4 lp · mm−1. The image layer width at the 1.5 lp · mm−1 resolution contour varied from 12 mm anteriorly to 41 mm posteriorly. The vertical magnification factor within the image layer showed a linear increase along the beam path from 1.21 to 1.36. The horizontal magnification varied from 1.07 to 1.71, and the Distortion Index from 0.85 to 1.15. The beam projection angulations to the average arch shape ranged from 90° anteriorly to 115° in the premolar segments and 105° in the molar regions.

The empirically derived image layer of the PC 1000 Mark II conforms to the shape of the average dental arch and that found using MTF analysis. The spatial resolution attained using a standard receptor is within the acceptable range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDavid WD, Tronje G, Welander U, Morris CR, Nummikoshi P: Imaging characteristics of seven panoramic X-ray units.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Supplementum 8: 1–68, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nummikoski P, Prihoda T, Langlais RP, McDavid WD: Dental and mandibular arch widths in three ethnic groups in Texas; a radiographic study.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 65: 609–17, 1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scarfe WC, Nummikoski P, McDavid WD, Welander U, Tronje G: Radiographic interproximal angulations: Implications for rotational panoramic radiography.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 76: 664–72, 1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Welander U: A mathematical model of narrow beam rotation methods.Acta Radiol Diagn, 15: 305–17, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR: Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. I. General considerations.Acta Radiol Diagn. 22: 295–9, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jung T: Die Wiedergabe der Frontz an region auf Panorama Schicht.Aufnahmen Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 27: 972–7, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shinozima M, Kohirazawa H, Kubota K, Tokui M: Tomorex (curved rotational tomography apparatus) in experimental and clinical practice.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 53: 94–110, 1982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Aken J: Panoramic x-ray equipment.J Am Dent Assoc. 86: 1050–9, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glass BJ, McDavid WD, Welander U, Morris CR: The central plane of the image layer determined experimentally in various panoramic machines.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 60: 104–12, 1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR: A method of increasing the anterior layer thickness in rotational panoramic radiography.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 12: 133–6, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shopf P: Langen-und Winkelmessungen am Orthopantomogramm.Fortschr Kieferorthop. 27: 107–14, 1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tammisalo EH: Simultaneous multi-layer orthopantomography.Suom Hammaslaak. 60: 32–40, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown CE, Christensen AC, Jerman AC: Dimensions of the focal trough in panoramic radiography.J Am Dent Assoc. 84: 843–7, 1972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freedman ML, Matteson SR: Fine structure of the Panorex image.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 43: 631–42, 1977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lund TM, Mason-Hing LR: A study of focal troughs of three panoramic dental x-ray machines. Part I. The area of sharpness.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pothol 39: 318–28, 1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Razmus FT, Pifer RG, Hancock HH: Versatile and cost-effective panoramic radiography for the rural practitioner.Proceedings of the 46 th Annual Session American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.; p 60, 1995 [Abstract]

  17. Hassen SM, Mason-Hing LR: A study of the zone of sharpness of three panoramic x-ray machines and the effect of screen speed on the sharpness zone.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pothol. 54: 242–9, 1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paiboon C, Mason Hing LR: Effect of border sharpness on the size and position of the focal trough of panoramic x-ray machines.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 60: 670–6, 1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welander U, McDavid WD, Tronje G, Morris CR: Imaging characteristics of seven panoramic x-ray units. V. Image distortion in planes at different object depths.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. (Suppl 8): 35–43, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  20. Welander U, Wickman G: Image distortion in narrow beam rotation radiography.Acta Radiol Diagn. 19: 507–12, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  21. Molteni R: A universal test phantom for dental panoramic radiography.Medicus Mundi. 36: 1–7, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  22. Panoramic Corporation PC 1000.User's Guide Addendum. Panoramic Corporation, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA, 1994

  23. McDavid WD, Morris CR, Tronje G, Welander U: Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 61: 129–34, 1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D'Ambrosio JA, Schiff TG, McDavid WD, Langland OE: Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic Screen-film combinations.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 61: 409–11, 1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ponce AZ, McDavid WD, Lundeen RC, Morris CR: Rodak T-Mat G film in rotational panoramic radiography.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 61: 649–52, 1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bäckström A, Welander U, McDavid WD, Tronje G, Shiojima M: Two dimensional modulation transfer functions for rotational panoramic radiography.Oral Radiol. 6: 15–26, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shiojima M, Bäckström A, Welander U, McDavid WD, Tronje G, Naitoh M: Layer thickness in panoramic radiography as defined by different noise equivalent passband.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 76: 244–50, 1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McDavid WD, Welander U, Kenerva H, Morris CR: Transfer function analysis in rotational panoramic radiography.Acta Radiol Diagn. 24: 27–32, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hayakawa Y, Eraso FE, Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Nishikawa K, Kuroyanagi K, Smith M: Modulation transfer function analysis of a newly revised rotational panoramic machine.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 25: 302–6, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eraso, F.E., Scarfe, W.C., Hayakawa, Y. et al. Image layer characteristics of the PC 1000 (mark II). Oral Radiol. 13, 11–21 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489639

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489639

Key Words

Navigation