Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of malignancy and prognostic factors based on mode of lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate lymph node metastasis as a key prognostic factor in esophageal cancer. Metastatic lesions in lymph nodes were grouped by histological morphology as intracapsular or extracapsular, and the significance of lymph node metastasis was evaluated by relating metastatic lesions to clinical pathologic factors and patient prognosis. In our hospital, 46 of 81 patients who underwent resection of esophageal cancer developed lymph node metastasis. These 46 patients were enrolled in a study analyzing the relationship between the metastatic mode and the clinicopathological factors. The frequency of extracapsular metastasis was significantly high in patients with a profound depth of cancer, three or more metastases, distant metastasis (n3 and n4), or severe lymphatic invasion. The prognosis was significantly worse in patients with extracapsular metastasis, and this tendency was also seen even in patients with three or more metastases, limited metastasis (n1 and n2), or mild lymphatic invasion (ly0 and ly1). These findings suggest that the metastatic mode reflects the degree of esophageal cancer progression and is an important prognostic factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Ando N, Kawahara H, Abe O (1985) Quantative and qualitative analysis on lymph node metastasis of carcinoma of the esophagus. J Jpn Surg Soc 86:424–434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Endo T (1992) A research of factors determining the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer using a multivariate analysis-by Cox's propotional hazards model (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 25:1191–1200

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kotoh T, Arima S, Inada S, Futami K (1995) A study of lymph node metastases and recurrence in thoracic esophageal cancer. Med Bull Fukuoka Univ 22:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kotoh T, Arima S, Inada S, Futami K (1997) Prognostic factors of patients with thoracic esophageal cancer using a multivariate analysis. Med Bull Fukuoka Univ 24:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  5. Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases (1992) Guidelines for the clinical and pathological studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, 8th edn

  6. Yoon T (1997) Mode of metastasis of Dukes C colorectal cancer in lymph nodes. J Jpn Soc Coloproctol 50:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  7. Izuo M, Akahane K, Okano A, Kawai T (1973) The significance relation to hematogenous metastasis of blood vessel invasion with lymph node in breast carcinoma (in Japanese). Igaku no Ayumi 87:490–491

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teel P, Sommers SC (1964) Vascular invasion as a prognostic factor in breast carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 118:1006–1008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kister SJ, Sommers SC, Haagensen CD, Cooley E (1966) Reevaluation of blood-vessel invasion as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 19:1213–1216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fridell GH, Betts A, Sommers SC (1965) The prognostic value of blood vessel invasion and lymphocytic infiltrates in breast carcinoma. Cancer 18:164–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tachikawa, D., Inada, S., Kotoh, T. et al. An evaluation of malignancy and prognostic factors based on mode of lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma. Surg Today 29, 1131–1135 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482260

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482260

Key Words

Navigation