Abstract
The characteristics of cholinoreceptors located on neurons TAN1, TAN2, and TAN3 of the ground snailAchatina fulica were studied by incubation of the central ganglia in a bath with cholinotropic preparations during intracellular recording of background neuron spike activity. Acetylcholine, nicotine, the selective n-cholinoreceptor agonist suberyldicholine, and the selective m-cholinoreceptor agonist 5-methylfurmethide concentration-dependently inhibited background spike activity to the level of complete blockade at concentrations of 500 μM. The m-cholinoblocker metamizil (500 μM) completely prevented the inhibitory activity of concentrations of 5-methylfurmethide of up to 500 μM. The central n-cholinoblocker etherophen (500 μM) completely blocked the inhibitory activity of 500 μM suberyldicholine. However, metamizil and etherophen added separately only partially decreased the inhibitory effects of acetylcholine but could not completely block the effect of acetylcholine. At the same time, mixtures of metamizil and etherophen (500 μM each) completely blocked the inhibition of background spike activity induced by acetylcholine. These results show that both classes of cholinoreceptors act on TAN neurons in the same direction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I. L. Brik, Yu. E. Mandel'shtam, and A. N. Fedin, “Cholinergic systems in insects,” in:The Comparative Pharmacology of Synaptic Receptors [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1977).
B. A. Ger, É. V. Zeimal', A. N. Kachman, G. T. Kobzar', and S. A. Gapon, “Two types of cholinoreceptors on the membranes of neurons isolated from the molluskPlanorbitus corneus,” in:The Comparative Pharmacology of Synaptic Receptors [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1977).
N. A. Losev, “The reciprocal nature of n- and m-cholinergic mechanisms in the central nervous system,” in:Progress in Current Neuropharmacology [in Russian], Leningrad (1982).
N. A. Losev, “Further development of the studies of S. V. Anichkov on the roles of n- and m-cholinoreactive biosystems in the body,” in:Neuropharmacology at the Turn of the Millennium [in Russian], Leningrad (1992).
A. S. Pivovarov, “Cholinoreceptors of snail neurons: identification, plasticity, and regulation by opioids and second messengers,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,42, No. 6, 1271–1286 (1992).
A. S. Pivovarov and G. N. Saganelidze, “Ionic mechanisms of the acetylcholine-, nicotine-, and muscarine-induced depolarization of neuron RPa4 in the snail,”Neirofiziologiya,21, No. 3, 305–314 (1989).
A. P. Sidel'nikov and I. I. Stepanov, “Dynamics of mitotic activity during the process of regeneration of the eye stalk of the giant African snailAchatina fulica,”Izv. Ros. Akad. Nauk Ser. Biol., No. 1, 63–67 (1996).
V. I. Skok, A. A. Selyanko and V. A. Derkach,Neuronal Cholinoreceptors [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1987).
R. D. Walker and D. A. Kerkut, “Comparative studies of neuron receptors in leeches, insects, and snails (focusing on cholinergic, tryptaminergic, and dopaminergic receptors),” in:The Comparative Pharmacology of Synaptic Receptors [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1977).
T. J. Biscoe and D. W. Straughan, “Micro-electrophoretic studies of neurones in cat hippocampus,”J. Physiol. (London),240, 125–134 (1974).
B. H. Bland, G. K. Kostopoulos and J. W. Phillis, “Acetylcholine sensitivity of hippocampal formation hemisphere,”Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.,52, 966–971 (1974).
D. Cattaert, A. Araque, W. Buno, and F. Clarac, “Nicotinic and muscarinic activation of motoneurons in the crayfish locomotor network,”J. Neurophysiol.,72, No. 4, 1622–1633 (1994).
T. M. Egan and R. A. North, “Acetylcholine acts on m2-muscarinic receptors to excite rat locus coeruleus neurones,”Brit. J. Pharmacol.,85, 733–735 (1985).
T. M. Egan and R. A. North, “Muscarinic receptor mediating potassium conductance increase of parabrachial neurons has a low affinity for pirenzipine,” in:Subtypes of Muscarinic Receptors: Second International Symposium, Boston University (1985), p. 24.
Y. Furukawa and M. Kobayashi, “Acetylcholine-induced hyperpolarization in identified neurones of the African giant snail (Achatina fulica Ferussac),”Brain Res.,374, No. 2, 227–235 (1986).
K. Krnjevic and J. W. Phillis, “Pharmacological properties of acetylcholine-sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex,”J. Physiol. (London),166, 328–350 (1963).
B. S. Ku, K. Isobe, and H. Takeuchi, “Pharmacological characteristics of four giant neurons identified in the cerebral ganglia of an African giant snail (Achatina fulica Ferussac),”Comp. Biochem. Physiol.,80, No. 1, Part C, 123–128 (1985).
B. S. Ku and H. Takeuchi, “Identification and pharmacological characteristics of the three peculiarly firing giant neurons in the visceral ganglion of an African giant snail (Achatina fulica Ferussac)”,Comp. Biochem. Physiol.,75, No. 1, Part C, 103–110 (1983)
T. Matsuoka, T. Goto, K. Watanabe, and H. Takeuchi, “Presence of TAN (tonically autoactive neuron) and its two analogous neurons, located in the right parietal ganglion of the subesophageal ganglia of an African giant snail (Achatina fulica Ferussac),”Comp. Biochem. Physiol.,83, No. 2, Part C, 345–351 (1986).
P. A. Pawson and R. Chase, “The development of transmission at an identified molluscan synapse. I. The emergence of synaptic plasticity,”J. Neurophysiol.,60, No. 6, 2196–2210 (1988).
L. Szczupak, S. Jordan, and W. B. Kristan, “Segment-specific modulation of the electrophysiological activity of leech Retzius neurons by acetylcholine,”J. Exp. Biol.,183, 115–135 (1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 568–574, April, 1999.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stepanov, I.I., Losev, N.A. Characteristics of cholinoreceptors on identified TAN neurons of the ground snailAchatina fulica . Neurosci Behav Physiol 30, 559–563 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462615
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462615