Skip to main content
Log in

Intended and initial settlement patterns of recent immigrants to the U.S., 1985–1990: A comparison of PUMS and INS public use files

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the time of entry into the U.S., immigrants are required to identify their ’intended’ destination to INS officials. They are not, however, required to remain in that location. If immigrant settlement patterns represent an evolutionary, dynamic system, it is likely that immigrants will adjust their location in the period shortly after arrival in the U.S. in response to various factors, leading to an ‘initial’ settlement system. Of interest in the following paper are the scale, direction and magnitude of adjustments made to the immigrant settlement system in the period shortly after arrival. The analysis utilizes the 1990 5 percent Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) and the 1985–90 Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Public Use Tapes in order to explore the intended and initial (observed) settlement patterns of recent (1985–90) immigrants and to comment upon the applicability of these terms. Results indicate that the two settlement patterns are highly similar, despite apparently high levels of movement among recent arrivals. The analysis also touches upon the ‘come to stay’ question raised by Ellis and Wright (1998a), suggesting that the interpretation of the question is dependent upon immigrant status rather than when immigrants first arrived in the U.S.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J.P. & Turner, E. (1996). Spatial patterns of immigrant assimilation.The Professional Geographer, 48, 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.P. & North, D.S. (1984).The, 1975 Refugees: Their First Five Years in America. Washington, DC: New TransCentury Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, A.P. (1989). Where do the new U.S. immigrants live?Journal of Labor Economics, 7, 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, A.P. & Koch, M.M. (1991). Internal migration of U.S. immigrants. In: J.M. Abowd & R.B. Freeman (Eds.),Immigration, Trade and the Labor Market, pp. 121–134. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaujot, R. & Rappak, J.P. (1987).Emigration From Canada: Its Importance and Interpretation. Population working paper No. 4, Ottawa: Policy and Program Development, Employment and Immigration Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G.J. (1994). The economics of immigration.Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1667–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, T.D. & Curtis, J.R. (1984).The Cuban-American Experience: Culture, Images and Perspectives. Totawa NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. & Miller, M.J. (1993).The Age of Migration. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V. (1998).The California Cauldron. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo, J.S. (1978). Does unemployment affect migration? Evidence from micro data.Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 504–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats, J. (1985). Indochinese resettlement in the United States.Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 75, 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, K.M., Durand, J. & Massey, J.S. (1992). Stemming the tide? Assessing the deterrent effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act.Demography, 29, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M. & Wright, R. (1998a). When immigrants are not migrants: Counting arrivals of the foreign-born using the U.S. Census.International Migration Review, 32, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M. & Wright, R. (1998b). The balkanization metaphor in the analysis of U.S. Immigration.Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 686–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T.J. (1992). Unauthorized immigration to the United States.Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, M. & Newbold, K.B. (2000). Migration propensities, patterns, and the role of human capital: Comparing Mexican, Cuban, and Puerto Rican interstate migration, 1985–1990.The Professional Geographer, 52, 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. (1996). Immigrant and native migrant magnets.American Demographics, 18, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. & Liaw, K.L. (1998). The impact of recent immigration on population redistribution within the United States. In J.P. Smith & B. Edmonston (Eds.),The Immigration Debate, pp. 388–448. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, D.L. & Espenshade, T.J. (1997). State and local fiscal impacts of New Jersey's immigrant and native households. In: T.J. Espenshade (Ed.),Keys to Successful Immigration: Implications of the New Jersey Experience, pp. 139–172. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimpel, J.G. (1999).Separate Destinations. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M.J., McDowell, J.M. & Trabka, E. (1991). Conducting descriptive and analytical research with the immigration and naturalization service public use tapes.Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 17, 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbister, J. (1996).The Immigration Debate: Remaking America. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isserman, A. & Kort, J. (1988).Regional Economic Consequences of U.S. Immigration Policy. Morgantown, WV: Regional Research Institute, Working Paper 8810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritz, M.M. & Nogle, J.M. (1994). Nativity concentration and internal migration among the foreign-born.Demography, 31, 509–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration.Population Index, 56, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A. & Taylor, J.E. (1994). An evaluation of international migration theory: The North American case.Population and Development Review, 20, 699–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, K.E. (1989). Hispanic migration and population redistribution in the United States.The Professional Geographer, 41, 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, K.E., Miyares, I.N., & Skop, E.H. (1997). The magnetism of Miami: Segmented paths in Cuban migration.Geographical Review, 87, 504–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E.G., Ray, B.K. & Rosenberg, M.W. (1990).The redistribution of immigrants in Canada. WP 12, Employment and Immigration Canada: Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E.G. & Rosenberg, M.W. (1995). Modeling migration flows of immigrant groups in Canada.Environment and Planning A, 27, 699–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, K.E. & Tienda, M. (1994). The settlement and secondary migration patterns of legalized immigrants: Insights from administrative records In Edmonston, B. & Passel, J.S. (Eds.),Immigration and Ethnicity Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, K.B. (1996). Internal migration of the foreign-born in Canada.International Migration Review, 30, 728–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, K.B. (1999a). Evolutionary immigrant settlement patterns: Concepts and evidence. In Pandit, K. & Davies-Withers, S. (Eds.),Migration and Restructuring in the US: A Geographic Perspective, pp. 250–270. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, K.B. (1999b). Internal migration of the foreign-born: Population concentration or dispersion?Population and Environment, 20, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nogle, J.M. (1994). Internal migration for recent immigrants to Canada.International Migration Review, 28, 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J.S. (1986). Undocumented immigration.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 487, 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J.S. & Woodrow, K.A. (1984). Geographic distribution of undocumented immigrants: Estimates of undocumented aliens counted in the 1980 census by state.International Migration Review, 18, 642–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedraza, S. & Rumbaut, R.G. (1996).Origins and Destinations: Immigration, Race and Ethnicity in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M.J. (1979).Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1994). Introduction: Immigration and its aftermath.International Migration Review, 28, 632–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. & Rumbaut, R. (1996).Immigrant America, Second Edition. University of California Press: Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L.A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration.Journal of Political Economy, 70, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenburg, P.H. (1973). Non-economic determinants of non-migration: Sociological considerations for migration theory.Rural Sociology, 38, 296–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1991).Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Public Use Microdata Sample: 5 Percent Sampl (Computer file). 2nd release. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (producer).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1995).Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. & Hannan, M. (1989). Dynamic settlement processes: The case of US immigration.Professional Geographer, 41, 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavodny, M. (2000). Determinants of recent immigrants' locational choices.International Migration Review, 33, 1014–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. & Lee, B.A. (1998). Heterolocalism: An alternative model of the sociospatial behavior of immigrant ethnic communities.International Journal of Population Geography, 4, 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (97-08436). The author is solely responsible for the content of this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newbold, K.B. Intended and initial settlement patterns of recent immigrants to the U.S., 1985–1990: A comparison of PUMS and INS public use files. Popul Environ 21, 539–563 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436771

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436771

Keywords

Navigation