Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Holomorphically projective mappings and their generalizations

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. N. I. Baranov and V. A. Kiosak,Special Vector Fields in Kählerian Spaces [in Russian], Odessa State Pedag. Inst. Press, Odessa (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sh. Baczo and L. Verhocki, “E 1-planar mappings of spaces of affine connection without torsion,”Publ. Math.,37, Nos. 1–2, 131–136 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. V. Beklemishev, “Differential geometry of spaces with an almost complex structure,” In:Itogi Nauki. Geometria, 1963, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1965), pp. 165–212.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. E. Berezovsky, “A new form of fundamental equations of almos geodesic mappings of the type\(\tilde \pi _1 \) of affine-connected spaces,” In:Coll. Sci. Confer. Young Scientists Odessa State Univ., Odessa, May 16–17, 1985. Ser. Math. [in Russian], Odessa Univ., Odessa (1986), pp. 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. E. Berezovsky, “Almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected spaces of the first type preservingn-orthogonal systems of hypersurfaces,” In:Abstr. Regional Conf, Young Scientists [in Russian], Uman (1990), pp. 1–2.

  6. V. E. Berezovsky,On the Problem of First-Type Almost Geodesic Mappings of Riemannian Spaces Which Preserve the System of n-Orthogonal Hypersurfaces [in Russian], Uman State Pedag. Inst. Press, Uman (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. E. Berezovsky, On Almost Geodesic Mappings of Affine-Connected Spaces of the π *1 Type [in Russian], Uman State Pedag. Inst. Press, Uman (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. E. Berezovsky, “On a special case of almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected first-type spaces,” In:Abstr. Part 1. Intern. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry. Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian] (1992), p. 12.

  9. V. E. Berezovsky and J. Mikeš, “On almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected spaces,” In:Eighth All-Union Conf. Contemp. Problems of Differ. Geometry, Abstr. [in Russian], Odessa (1984), p. 18.

  10. V. E. Berezovsky and J. Mikeš,A New Classification of Almost Geodesic Mappings of Affine-Connected Spaces [in Russian], Uman State Pedag. Inst. Press, Uman (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. E. Berezovsky and J. Mikeš, “On the classification of almost geodesic mappings,” In:Abstr. Republ. Sci.-Method. Conf. Dedicated to the 200th Anniversary of N. I. Lobachevsky, September 3–8, 1992. Part 1 [in Russian], Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1992), p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. V. Vedenyapin, “On certain (n-2)-fold projective spaces,” In:Sci.Reports of Higher School. Phys. Math. Sci. [in Russian], Vol. 6 (1958), pp. 119–126.

  13. V. V. Vishnevsky, “Affinor structures of manifolds as structures defined by algebras,”Tensor,26, 363–372 (1972).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. V. V. Vishnevsky, “Manifolds over plurals and semitangent structures,” In:Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Probl. Geom., Vol. 20, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1988), pp. 35–74.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. V. Vishnevsky, A. P. Shirokov, and V. V. Shurigin,Spaces over Algebras [in Russian], Kazan Univ. Press, Kazan (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. L. Gavril'chenko, “To the problem of conformal mappings of Riemannian spaces,” In:Abstr. All-Union School “Optim. Control. Geometry and Analysis” [in Russian], Kemerovo (1988), p. 16.

  17. M. L. Gavril'chenko, “Conformal mappings of conformally symmetric spaces onto Einstein spaces,” In:Abstr. Part 1. Intern. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry. Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian], Kazan State Univ. (1992), p. 20.

  18. V. A. Dobrovolsky, “Almost projective mappings of gravitational fields. Degenerated case,” In:Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity [in Russian], Vol. 8, Kazan State Univ., Kazan (1971), pp. 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. V. Domashev and J. Mikeš,On the Theory of Holomorphically Projective Mappings of Kählerian Spaces [in Russian], Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. V. Domashev and J. Mikeš, “On the theory of holomorphically projective mappings of Kählerian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,23, No. 2, 297–304 (1978).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. L. E. Evtushik, Yu. G. Lumiste, N. M. Ostianu, and A. P. Shirokov, “Geometric-differential structures on manifolds,” In:Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Probl. Geom., Vol. 9, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1979), pp. 1–247.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. A. Igoshin and Ya. L. Shapiro, “Quasigeodesic mappings and Riemannian graded structures,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,305, No. 5, 1035–1038 (1989).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. V. R. Kaigorodov, “On the Riemannian spaces\(\mathop {K_n^s }\limits^ * \),” In:Tr. Geom. Sem., Vol. 5, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1976), pp. 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. R. Kaigorodov, “The structure of curvature of space-time,” In:Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Probl. Geom., Vol. 14, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1983), pp. 177–204.

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. A. Kiosak and M. Haddad,On Holomorphically Projective Mappings of A-Harmonically Kählerian spaces [in Russian], Odessa Nation. Econ. Inst. Press, Odessa (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. A. Kiosak and M. Haddad, “OnA-harmonic spaces,” In:Geom. Obobshch. Prostr., Penza (1992). pp. 41–45.

  27. I. N. Kurbatova,On the Problem of Quasiholomorphically Projective Mappings of K-Spaces [in Russian], Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  28. I. N. Kurbatova, “On quasiholomorphically projective mappings ofK-spaces with preservation of thee-structure,” In:Abstr. 7th All-Union Conf. Contemp. Geom. Prob. [in Russian], Minsk (1979), p. 104.

  29. I. N. Kurbatova, “HP-mappings ofH-spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb., Kharkov, No. 27, 75–82 (1984).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. I. N. Kurbatova, “On 4-quasiplanar mappings of almost quaternion manifolds,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat., No. 1, 75–78 (1986).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. I. N. Kurbatova and J. Mikeš, “Simulating physical fields by generalized geodesic mappings,” In:Abstr. All-Union Conf. “Contemporary Theoretical and Experimental Problems of the Theory of Relativity and Gravitation [in Russian], People's Friendship University Press, Moscow (1984), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  32. I. N. Kurbatova and N. V. Yablonskaya, “On the problem of the theory of variations ofF-planar curves,”Acta Acad. Paed. Szegediensis. Ser. Phys., Chem., Math., 29–34 (1987–88).

  33. S. G. Leiko and Sami Hussein,On Rotation-Conformal Diffeomorphisms, Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yu. G. Lumiste, “Semisymmetric submanifolds,” In:Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Probl. Geom., Vol. 23, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1991), pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Mikeš, “On the estimation of arbitrariness of the general solution of a system of partial differential equations,” In:2nd Republ. Symp. Differ. Integr. Equations [in Russian], Odessa (1978), pp. 59–60.

  36. J. Mikeš,Some Estimates of the Degrees of Mobility Relative to Holomorphically Projective Mappings [in Russian], Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Mikeš, “On holomorphically projective mappings of Kählerian spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb.,23, 90–98 (1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Mikeš, “On equidistant Kählerian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,38, No. 4, 627–633 (1985).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Mikeš, “Estimates of the orders of groups of projective and holomorphically projective transformations of Riemannian spaces,” In:All-Union School “Optimal Control. Geometry and Analysis”, Abstr. [in Russian], Kemerovo (1986), p. 98.

  40. J. Mikeš, “On Sasakian and equidistant Kählerian spaces,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,291, No. 1, 33–36 (1986).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. J. Mikeš,On Concircular Vector Fields “in the Large” on Compact Riemannian Spaces [in Russian], Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Mikeš, “On the arbitrariness ofF-planar mappings,” In:Abstr. 9th All-Union Geom. Conf. [in Russian], Kishinev (1988), p. 212.

  43. J. Mikeš, “Some problems of the theory of geodesic mappings and infinitesimal, almost geodesic type π2 transformations,” In:Abstr. All-Union School “Optim. Control. Geometry and Analysis” [in Russian], Kemerovo (1988), p. 35.

  44. J. Mikeš, “OnF-planar transformations and infinitesimal deformations,” In:Abstracts of 3rd All-Union School. Pontryagin Readings. Optim. Control. Geometry and Analysis [in Russian], Kemerovo (1990), p. 49.

  45. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and quasigeodesic mappings “in the large” of Riemannian spaces with boundary,” In:Abstr. All-Union Conf. Young Scientists in Differ. Geom. Dedicated to 80th Anniversary of N. V. Efimov [in Russian], Abrau-Dyurso-Rostov-on-Don (1990), p. 69.

  46. J. Mikeš, “F-planar transformations of affine-connected spaces,”Arch. Math., Brno,27A, 53–56 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and holomorphically projective mappings of generalizedm-recurrent Riemannian spaces,”Sib. Mat. Zh., 1–14 (1991).

  48. J. Mikeš, “On holomorphically projective mappings of Kählerian spaces,” In:Abstr. Rep. Sci.-Method. Confer. Dedicated to the 200th Anniversary of N. I. Lobachevsky, September 3–8, 1992, Part 1 [in Russian], Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1992), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and holomorphically projective mappings of compact, semisymmetric, and Ricci-semisymmetric spaces,” In:Abstr. Part 1. Inter. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry. Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian], Kazan State Univ. Press, Kazan (1992), pp. 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. Mikeš, “OnF- andf-planar mappings, transformations, and deformations,” In:The Geometry of Generalized Spaces [in Russian], Penza (1992), pp. 60–65.

  51. J. Mikeš, “On specialF-planar mappings onto Riemannian spaces,”Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Mat., Mekh. (1994).

  52. J. Mikeš,Geodesic Mappings of Affine and Riemannian Spaces [in Russian], All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. Mikeš, M. L. Gavril'chenko, and E. I. Gladysheva, “On conformal mappings onto Einsteinian spaces,”Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Mat., Mekh. (1994).

  54. J. Mikeš and N. S. Sinyukov, “On quasiplanar mappings of affine-connected spaces,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat., No. 1, 55–61 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  55. J. Mikeš and G. A. Starko, “On hyperbolically Sasakian and equidistant hyperbolic Kählerian spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb.,32, 92–98 (1989).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. J. Mikeš and G. A. Starko, “Generalized equidistant Kählerian and hyperbolically Kählerian spaces,” In:Abstr. 3rd All-Union School. Pontryagin Readings. Optimal Control. Geometry and Analysis [in Russian], Kemerovo (1990), p. 49.

  57. V. A. Mirzoyan, “Ric-semisymmetric submanifolds,” In:Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Probl. Geom., Vol. 23, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1991), pp. 29–66.

    Google Scholar 

  58. D. Moldobaev and K. R. Esenov, “Certain problems connected with nontrivial holomorphically projective mappings of Kählerian spaces ‘in the large’,” In:Final Sci. Conf. of Professors and Lectures of the Inst., abstr. [in Russian], Kirghizia Women's Ped. Inst., Frunze (1989), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  59. A. P. Norden,Affine-Connected Spaces [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  60. A. Z. Petrov,New Methods in the General Theory of Relativity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Z. Petrov, “Simulation of physical fields,” In:Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity [in Russian], Vol. 4-5, Kazan State Univ., Kazan (1968), pp. 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  62. S. M. Pokas and N. V. Yablonskaya, “On special, almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected and Riemannian spaces,”Acta Acad. Paed. Szeged. Ser. Phys., Chem., Math., 45–50 (1987–1988).

  63. Raad Kadem Dzhamil and I. N. Kurbatova,Geometric Objects, Invariant Relative to 2F-Planar Affine-Connected and Riemannian Spaces with Cubic Structure F (F 3=δ) [in Russian], Dept. at Ukrainian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (1990).

  64. Ž. Radulovič and J. Mikeš, “On geodesic andF-planar mappings of conformally Kählerian spaces,” In:Abstr. Part 1. Inter. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry. Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian], Kazan State Univ. Press, Kazan (1992), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  65. P. A. Rashevsky, “Scalar fields in fibered space,” In:Tr. Sem. Vekt. Tens. Anal., No. 6, Moscow State Univ. (1948).

  66. N. S. Sinyukov,Geodesic Mappings of Riemannian Spaces [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. N. S. Sinyukov, “Almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected and Riemannian spaces,” In:Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Probl. Geom., Vol. 13, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1982), pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  68. N. S. Sinyukov, “Fundamentals of the global theory of almost geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces,” In:Differ.-Geom. School [in Russian], Chernovtsy Univ. Press, Chernovtsy (1991), pp. 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

  69. N. S. Sinyukov, I. N. Kurbatova, and J. Mikeš,Holomorphically Projective Mappings of Kählerian Spaces [in Russian], Study Aid, Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  70. N. S. Sinyukov and E. N. Sinyukova, “On holomorphically projective mapping of special Kählerian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,36, No. 3, 417–423 (1984).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. N. S. Sinyukov and E. N. Sinyukova, “Approximate holomorphically projective mapping of a Kählerian space,” In:Abstr. 3rd All-Union School “Optim. Control. Geometry and Analysis” [in Russian], Kemerovo (1990), p. 66.

  72. E. N. Sinyukova, “On holomorphically projective mappings of Kählerian spaces that satisfy some conditions of differential character,” In:Abstr. 8th All-Union Conf. on Contemp. Prob. Differ. Geometry [in Russian], Odessa (1984), p. 140.

  73. E. N. Sinyukova,Holomorphically Projective Mappings of Kählerian Spaces in the Large under Certain Conditions of Differential Character [in Russian], Dep. at Ukrainian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, 1–32 (1987).

  74. E. N. Sinyukova and N. S. Sinyukov, “InfinitesimalF-planar deformations of the metrics of Riemannian spaces,” In:Abstr. All-Union Conf. in Geometry and Analysis [in Russian], Novosibirsk (1989), p. 75.

  75. V. S. Sobchuk, “On an almost geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,212, No. 5, 1071–1073 (1973).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  76. V. S. Sobchuk, “An almost geodesic mapping of Riemannian spaces onto symmetric Riemannian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,17, No. 5, 757–763 (1975).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  77. V. S. Sobchuk, “An almost geodesic mapping of Riemannian spaces that preserve then-orthogonal system of hypersurfaces” In:Abstr. 7th All-Union Conf. in Contemp. Prob. of Geometry [in Russian], Minsk (1979), p. 183.

  78. V. S. Sobchuk, “Almost geodesic mappings of semisymmetric spaces,” In:Abstrstr. All-Union School “Optimal Control. Geometry and Analysis” [in Russian], Kemerovo (1986), p. 199.

  79. V. S. Sobchuk, “Internal, almost geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat., No. 5, 62–64 (1989).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  80. V. S. Sobchuk, “Investigations in the theory of geodesic mappings and their generalizations,” In:Diff.-Geom. School, Chernovtsy Univ. Press, Chernovtsy (1991), pp. 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  81. V. S. Sobchuk and V. S. Shadny,(n-2)-Projective Spaces Corresponding to a Recurrent, Almost Contact Structure [in Russian], Chernovtsy Univ. Press, Chernovtsy (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  82. G. A. Starko, “On hyperbolic Kählerian spaces that admit ofK-concircular vector fields,” In:Abstr-Part 1. Inter. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry, Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian], Kazan State Univ., Kazan (1992), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  83. S. E. Stepanov, “On one class of Riemannian structures of an almost product,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat., No. 7, 40–46 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  84. M. Haddad, “On holomorphically projective mapping of four-dimensional Einstein Kählerian spaces,” In:Abstr. 3rd All-Union School. Pontryagin Readings. Optimal Control Geometry and Analysis [in Russian], Kemerovo (1990), p. 82.

  85. M. Haddad, “On generalized harmonic Kählerian spaces,” In:All-Union Meeting of Young Scientists in Differ. Geometry Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of N. V. Efimov, abstr. [in Russian], Abrau-Dyurso-Rostov-on-Don (1990), p. 112.

  86. M. Haddad, “Holomorphically projective mappings of generalized quasisemisymmetric Kählerian spaces,” In:Abstr. Part 1. Inter. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry. Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian], Kazan State Univ. Press, Kazan (1992), p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  87. V. M. Chernyshenko, “Affine-connected spaces with a corresponding complex of geodesics,” In:Collection of Works of Mech.-Math. Chair of Dnepropetrovsk Univ. [in Russian], No. 6 (1961), pp. 105–118.

  88. V. M. Chernyshenko, “Spaces with a special complex of geodesics,” In:Tr. Sem. Vekt. Tenz. Anal., Vol. 2 (1961), pp. 253–268.

  89. M. A. Cheshkova,On almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected spaces, Dep. at All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (1989).

  90. V. S. Shadny, “Tensor Criteria of (n-2)-projective Riemannian spaces corresponding to the absolutely parallele-structure,” In:Symp. in Geometry “in the Large” and the Fundamentals of the Theory of Relativity [in Russian], Novosibirsk (1982), pp. 113–114.

  91. V. S. Shadny,On Almost Geodesic Second-Type Mappings of Riemannian Spaces onto Conformally Flat Spaces [in Russian], Dep. at Ukrainian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (1987).

  92. V. S. Shadny, “On a certain class of almost geodesic second-type mappings of special Riemannian spaces,” In:Differ. Geom. School [in Russian], Chernovtsy Univ. Press, Chernovtsy (1991), pp. 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  93. V. S. Shadny and N. V. Fedchishin, “Almost geodesic mapping π2 of Riemannian spaces onto conformally flat spaces,” In:All-Union Conf. in Geometry “in the Large” [in Russian], Novosibirsk (1987), p. 131.

  94. V. S. Shadny and N. V. Fedchishin,On Almost Geodesic Second-Type Mappings of Riemannian Spaces onto Conformally Flat Spaces [in Russian], Chernovtsy Univ. Press, Chernovtsy (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  95. I. G. Shandra, “Geodesic mappings of equidistant spaces and Jordan algebras of the spacesV n (K),”Diff. Geom. Mnogoobr. Figur, No. 24, 104–111 (1993).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  96. Ya. L. Shapiro, “On quasigeodesic mappings,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat., No. 9, 53–55 (1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. A. P. Shirokov, “To the problem ofA-spaces,” In:A Hundred and Twenty-Five Years of Lobachevsky Non-Euclidean Geometry (1826–1951) [in Russian], GITL, Moscow-Leningrad (1952), pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  98. A. P. Shirokov, “Structures on differentiable manifolds,” In:Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki Algebra. Topology. Geometry. 1967, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow (1969), pp. 127–188.

    Google Scholar 

  99. P. A. Shirokov,Selected Works in Geometry [in Russian], Kazan State Univ. Press, Kazan (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  100. M. Shiha, “Holomorphically projective mappings ofm-parabolically Kählerian spaces,” In:Abstr. Part 1. Inter. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry. Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian], Kazan State Univ. Press, Kazan (1992), p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  101. M. Shiha and J. Mikeš, “Parabolically Kählerian and Sasakian spaces,” In:All-Union Meeting of Young Scientists in Differ. Geometry Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of N. V. Efimov, abstr. [in Russian], Abrau-Dyurso-Rostov-on-Don (1990), p. 120.

  102. M. Shiha and J. Mikeš, “Holomorphically projective mappings ofm-parabolically Kählerian spaces,” In:3rd All-Union School. Pontryagin Readings. Optimal Control, Geometry and Analysis, abstr. [in Russian], Kemerovo (1990), p. 49.

  103. M. Shiha and J. Mikeš,Holomorphically projective Mappings of Parabolically Kählerian Spaces [in Russian], Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  104. K. R. Esenov,Nontrivial Holomorphically Projective Mapping (NHPM) of Special Kählerian Spaces onto the Einstein Space [in Russian], Dep. at Ukrainian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (1985).

  105. K. R. Esenov, Classification of Certain Riemannian Spaces That Admit of Special, Second-Type π2, Almost Geodesic Mappings, Odessa State Univ. Press, Odessa (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  106. K. R. Esenov, “On equations which are invariant relative to special mappings,” In:Conf. Math. Mech. in Kirghizia Dedicated to the 70th Anniversary of the October, abstr. [in Russian], Frunze (1987).

  107. K. R. Esenov, “On a certain class of (n−2)-projective Riemannian spaces,” In:Proc. Sci. Meeting Young Scientists (in Russian], Odessa (1986), pp. 165–170.

  108. K. R. Esenov, “On the properties of generalized equidistant Kählerian spaces that admit of special, second-type, almost geodesic mappings.” [Invest. in Topol. Gener. Spaces], In:Research Works [in Russian], Frunze (1988), pp. 81–84.

  109. K. R. Esenov, “On subprojective second-order spaces”, In:Abstr. Part 1. Inter. Sci. Conf. Lobachevsky and Contemp. Geometry. Kazan, August 18–22, 1992 [in Russian], Kazan State Univ. Press, Kazan (1992), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  110. N. V. Yablonskaya, “On certain classes of almost geodesic mappings of general affine-connected spaces”,Ukr. Geon. Sb., No. 27, 120–124 (1984).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  111. A. Adamov, “On reduced almost geodesic mappings in Riemannian spaces”,Demonstr. Math.,15, No. 4, 925–934 (1982).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  112. M. Afvat and A. Švec, “Global differential geometry of hypersurfaces”,Rozpr. Čsav,88, No. 7, 1–75 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  113. H. Akbar-Zadeh, “Sur les transformations holomorphiquement projectives de varietes hermitiannes et kähleriannes”,C.R. Acad. Sci.,304, Ser. 1, 335–338 (1987).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  114. V. E. Berezovski and J. Mikeš, “On classification of almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected spaces”, In:Proc. Conf. Diff Geom. Appl., Novi Sad, Yugoslavia (1989), pp. 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  115. É. Cartan, “Sur une classe remarquable d'espaces de Riemann”,Bull. Soc. Math. France,54, 214–264 (1926).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  116. É. Cartan,Leçons sur la Theorie des Spaces a Connexion Projective, Paris (1931).

  117. N. Coburn, “Unitary spaces with corresponding geodesic”,Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,1, No. 47, 901–910 (1941).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  118. L. P. Eisenhart,Riemannian Geometry, Princeton Univ. Press (1926).

  119. A. Fialkow, “Conformal geodesic”,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,45, 443–473 (1939).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  120. M. Haddad, “Holomorphically projective mappings ofT-quasisemisymmetric and generally symmetric Kählerian spaces”, In:Proc. Conf. Diff. Geom. Appl., Opava, Czechoslovakia (1993), pp. 137–141.

  121. I. Hasegawa and K. Yamaguchi, “On infinitesimal holomorphically projective transformations in compact Káhlerian manifolds”,Hokkaido Math. J.,8, No. 2, 214–219 (1979).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  122. S. Ishihara, “Holomorphically projective changes and their groups in almost complex manifolds”,Tonoku Math. J.,9, No. 3, 273–297 (1957).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  123. S. Ishihara and S. Tachibana, “A note on holomorphically projective transformations of a Kählerian space with parallel Ricci tensor”,Tohoku Math. J.,13, No. 2, 193–200 (1961).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  124. E. Kähler, “Uber eine bemerkenswerte Hermitische Metric”,Abh. Math. Semin. Hamburg. Univ.,9, 173–186 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. T. Kashiwada, “Notes on infinitesimalHP-transformations in Kähler manifolds with constant scalar curvature”,Natur. Sci. Rept.,25, No. 2, Ochanomizu Univ., 67–68 (1974).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  126. S. Kobayashi,Transformation Groups in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  127. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu,Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. 1, Interscience, New York-London (1963); Vol. 2 (1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  128. A. Lichnerowicz, “Courbure, nombres de Betti et espaces symmetriques”, In:Proc. Intern. Congress Math., Cambridge, 1950.Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 2 (1952), pp. 216–223.

  129. J. Mikeš, “F-planar mappings and transformations”, In:Diff. Geom. Appl. Proc. Conf. August 24–30, 1986, Brno, Czechoslovakia, Brno (1986), pp. 245–254.

  130. J. Mikeš, “On an order of special transformation of Riemannian spaces”, In:Proc. Conf. Diff. Geom. Appl., Dubrovnik, 1988, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia (1989), pp. 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  131. J. Mikeš, “Geodesic and holomorphically projective mappings of generalizedm-recurrent spaces”, In:Abstr. Colloq. Diff. Geom., J. Bolyai Math. Soc., Eger, Hungary (1989), pp. 35–36.

  132. J. Mikeš, “Global geodesic mappings and their generalizations for compact Riemannian spaces”, In:Proc. Conf. Diff. Geom. Appl., Opava, Czechoslovakia (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  133. D. Moldobayev and J. Mikeš, “On some problems of the conformal transformations of Riemannian spaces”. In:Diff. Geom. Appl. Proc. Conf., Brno, 1986, Comm. (1987), pp. 255–256.

  134. D. Moldobayev and A. B. Sadikova, “On some special transformations preserving the Ricci tensor”, In:Diff. Geom. Appl. Proc. Conf., Brno, Czechoslovakia, 1989, World Scientific, Singapore (1990), pp. 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Y. Muto, “On some special Kählerian spaces”,Sci. Repts. Yokogama Nat. Univ., Sec. 1, No. 8, 1–8 (1961).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  136. L. Nicolescu, “Les espaces de Riemann en representation subgeodesique”,Tensor,32, No. 2, 182–187 (1978).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  137. T. Otsuki and Y. Tashiro, “On curves in Kählerian space”,Math. J. Okayama Univ.,4, 54–58 (1954).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  138. M. Prvanović, “Holomorphically projective transformations in a locally product spaces”,Math. Balkan,1, 195–213 (1971).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  139. M. Prvanović, “A note on holomorphically projective transformations on the Kähler spaces”,Tensor,35, No. 1, 99–104 (1981).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  140. Ž. Radulovič and J. Mikeš, “Geodesic and holomorphically projective mappings of conformally Kählerian spaces”, In:Proc. Conf. Diff. Geom. Appl., Opava, Czechoslovakia (1993), pp. 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  141. B. B. Ravi, “On Kählerian concircularn-symmetric andn-recurrent manifolds”,Acta Sci. Indica. Math.,13, No. 4, 207–211 (1987).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  142. T. Sakaguchi, “On the holomorphically projective correspondence between Kählerian spaces preserving complex structure”,Hokkaido Math. J.,33, No. 2, 203–212 (1974).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  143. M. Shiha, “On the theory of holomorphically projective mappings of parabolically Kählerian spaces”, In:Proc. Conf. Diff. Geom. Appl., Opava, Czechoslovakia (1993), pp. 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  144. S. S. Singh, P. K. Srivastava, and R. P. Ojha, “A classification of Kählerian manifolds satisfying some special conditions”,Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungary,48, Nos. 3–4, 247–254 (1986).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  145. S. Tachibana and S. Ishihara, “On infinitesimal holomorphically projective transformations in Kählerian manifolds”,Tohoku Math. J.,12, No. 1, 77–101 (1960).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  146. Y. Tashiro, “On holomorphically projective correspondence in an almost complex space”,Math. J. Okayama Univ.,6, No. 2, 147–152 (1957).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  147. A. G. Walker, “On Ruses spaces of recurrent curvature”,Proc. London Math. Soc.,52, No. 1, 36–64 (1950).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  148. A. G. Walker, “Conformally Kähler manifolds”,Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.,50, 16–19 (1954).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  149. T. Yamada, “On certain recurrent spaces andHP-transformation in a Kählerian manifold”,J. Asahikawa Tech. Coll.,13, 103–109 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  150. S. Yamaguchi, “On Kählerian torse-forming vector fields”,Kodai Math. J.,2, No. 4, 103–115 (1979).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  151. K. Yano, “Concircular geometry, I–IV”,Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo,16, 195–200, 442–448, 505–511 (1940).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  152. K. Yano, “Union curves and subpaths”,Math. J.,1, 51–59 (1948).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  153. K. Yano, “Sur la correspondence projective entre deux espaces pseudohermitiens”,C.R. Acad. Sci.,239, 1346–1348 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  154. K. Yano,Differential Geometry on Complex and Almost Complex Spaces, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1965).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  155. K. Yano and H. Hiramatu, “Integral inequalities and their applications in Kählerian manifolds admitting a holomorphically projective vector field”,Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica,6, 313–332 (1978).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J. Mikeŝ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, Seriya Sovremennaya Matematika i Ee Prilozheniya. Tematicheskie Obzory. Vol. 30, Geometriya-3, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mikeŝ, J. Holomorphically projective mappings and their generalizations. J Math Sci 89, 1334–1353 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02414875

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02414875

Keywords

Search

Navigation