Skip to main content
Log in

Biochemical systematics of Japanese fireflies of the subfamily Luciolinae and their flash communication systems

  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Japanese fireflies of the subfamily Luciolinae are biochemically analyzed using 13 allozymes, and the phylogenetic relationships obtained from this analysis are compared with their flash communication systems. As a result, the Japanese Luciolinae can be divided into three groups.Hotaria parvula andH. tsushimana together withLuciola yayeyamana andL. kuroiwae from the first group, and they use the same communication system.L. lateralis, Curtos okinawana, andC. costipennis make up the second group, and their communication systems are also the same.L. cruciata makes up the last one, and its communication system is different from the other fireflies of Luciolinae. Therefore, their taxonomical arrangement and communication systems are not congruent. However, the genetic similarity deduced by allozymic analysis of the members of the Japanese Luciolinae is highly consistent with their flash communication systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballantyne, L. A. (1968). Revisional studies of Australian and Indomalayan Luciolini (Coleoptera: Lampyridae: Luciolinae).Pap. Dept. Ent. Univ. Qd. 2150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H. S. (1951). North American fireflies of the genusPhoturis.Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, C., and Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels.Anal. Biochem. 44276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eanes, W. F., and Koehn, R. K. (1978). An analysis of genetic structure in the Monarch butterfly,Danaus plexippus L.Evolution 32784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1991).PHYLIP Phylogeny Inference Package, Version 3.4 University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. (1980).Biochemical Systematics and Evolution, Blackie.

  • Harvey, E. N. (1957). A history of luminescence.Am. Phil. Soc. Philadelphia 44669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1966). Studies on the flash communication system inPhotinus fireflies.Misc. Pub. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1971). Bioluminescent communication in insects.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1972). Mating behavior of a New GuineaLuciola firefly: A new communicative protocol (Coleoptera:Lampyridae).Coleopt. Bull. 26155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1973). Model for mating protocol of synchronous flashing fireflies.Nature 245268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1983). Bioluminescence and communication in insect.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, F. A. (1910). A note on the light-emission of some American Lampyridae.Can. Entomol. 42357.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, F. A. (1911). Some further observations on the light-emission of American Lampyridae: Adaptation in the Photinini.Can. Entomol. 43399.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, F. A. (1912). Observation on the light-emission of American Lampyrida.Can. Entomol. 44309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, F. A. (1966).Coleopterorum Catalogus, Suppl. 9. Lampyridae Steel, W. O. (ed), W. Junk, s-Gravenhage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschulsky, V. (1845). La collection de coleopteres Russes.Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscou 1836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. W., Sites, J. W., Buth, D. G., and Haufler, C. H. (1990). Protein I: Isozyme electrophoresis. In Hill, D. M., and Moritz, C. (eds.),Molecular Systematics Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations.Am. Nat. 106283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1975).Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1987).Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, E. (1907).Genera Insectorum, 53. Fasc. Coleoptera, Fam. Lampyridae Wytsman, M. P. (ed), Saint-Alphonse, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohba, N. (1983a). Studies on the communication system of Japanese fireflies.Sci. Rep. Yokosuka City Mus. 301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohba, N. (1983b). Flash communication inLuciola kuroiwae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).Sci. Rep. Yokosuka City Mus. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohba, N. (1985). Flash communication inHotaria tsushimana (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).Sci. Rep. Yokosuka City Mus. 3313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohba, N., and Goto, Y. (1989). Morphology and behavior ofLuciola yayeyamana (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).Sci. Rep. Yokosuka City Mus. 371 (In Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, H., Sato, Y., Fujiyama, S., and Ohba, N. (1993). Genetic differentiation between ecological two types of the Japanese firefly,Hotaria parvula: An electrophoretic analysis of allozymes.Zool. Sci. 10697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuasa, H. (1937). Description of a new genus of the family Lampyridae (Coleoptera).Kontyû 11107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, H., Sato, Y., Fujiyama, S. et al. Biochemical systematics of Japanese fireflies of the subfamily Luciolinae and their flash communication systems. Biochem Genet 34, 191–200 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407019

Key words

Navigation