Skip to main content
Log in

Microorganisms associated with production lots of the nucleopolyhedrosis virus of the gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar [Lep.: Lymantriidae]

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Samples of a gypsy moth nucleopolyhedrosis virus product, Gypchek®, were taken each day during a 100-day production run and monitored for the presence of pathogenic bacteria and fungi. The standard plate count/g of product was 5.97±1.51×108 over the 100-day period, while the sporulating bacteria count was 3.81±1.21×106/g. We did not detect obligate anaerobic or fecal coliform bacteria in any of the samples.Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, B. licheniformis, Streptococcus faecalis, Serratia liquefaciens, andAspergillus niger were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. We did not detect primary pathogenic bacteria or fungi, but the presence of opportunistic pathogens indicated that assiduous monitoring of the virus production facility and rigorous quality control of production batches are necessary.

Résumé

Des échantillons d'une préparation à base du virus de la nucléopolyhédrose deLymantria dispar (L.), le Gypchek®, furent prélevés tous les jours durant un cycle de production de 100 jours, et ont été examinés afin d'y détecter des bactéries et champignons pathogénes. Le nombre moyen de colonies bactériennes par gramme du produit était de 5.97±1.51×108 durant la période de 100 jours, tandis que le nombre de bactéries sporulées était de 3.81±1.21×106/g. Nous n'avons trouvé ni bactéries anaérobies ni bactéries coliformes fécales dans aucun des échantillons.Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus epidermis, B. licheniformis, Streptococcus faecalis, Serratia liquefaciens etAspergillus niger furent les micro-organismes le plus souvent isolés. Nous n'avons pas trouvé de bactéries ou de champignons pathogénes primaires, mais la présence de pathogènes opportunistes indiquait qu'une surveillance assidue de l'équipement de production du virus et un contrôle rigoureux de la qualité des lots de production sont nécessaires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association — 1976. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 14th ed. —Am. Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird-Parker, A.C. — 1963. A classification of micrococci and staphylococci based on physiological and biochemical tests. —J. Gen. Microbiol., 30, 409–427.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J.E., Lennette, E.H. &Truant, J.P. (eds.) — 1970. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. —Am. Soc. Microbiol., Bethesda, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R.E. &Gibbons, N.E. (ed.). — 1974. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th ed. —Williams & Wilkins Co. Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, C.C. &Redys, J.J. — 1970. Characteristics of motile strains ofStreptococcus faecalis pathogenic to larvae of the gypsy moth. —J. Invertebr. Pathol., 15, 420–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P.R. &Ewing, W.H. — 1972. Identification ofEnterobacteriaceae, 3rd ed. —Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, B.M. &Shapton, D.A. (eds.) — 1966. Identification Methods for Microbiologists, Part B. —Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, B.M. &Skinner, F.A. (eds.) — 1966. Identification Methods for Microbiologists, Part A. —Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.E., Haynes, W.C. & Hor-Nay Pang, C. — 1973. The genusBacillus. —U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handbook No. 427, Washington, D.C.

  • Graber, C.D., Rabin, E.R., Mason, A.D. Jr., &Vogel, E.H. Jr., — 1962. Increasing incidence of nosocomialHerellea vaginicola infections in burned patients. —Surg. Genecol. Obstet., 114, 109–112.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A., Stephan, R.M. &Paul, F. — 1962. Prevalence ofActinomyces israelii, A. naeslundii, Bacteronema matruchetii andCandida albicans in selected areas of the oral cavity. —J. Dent. Res., 41, 1050–1059.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamanna, C. &Jones, L. — 1963. Lethality for mice of vegetative spore forms ofBacillus cereus andBacillus cereus-like insect pathogens injected intraperitoneally and subcutaneously. —J. Bacteriol., 85, 532–535.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larone, D.H. — 1976. Medically Important Fungi, a Guide to Identification. —Harper & Row Publishers, Hagerstown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, F.B., McManus, M.L. & Schneeberger, N.F. — 1979. Guidelines for the use of Gypchek to control the gypsy moth. —U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. Ne-441.

  • Mossel, D.A.A., Koopman, M.J. &Jongerius, E. — 1967. Enumeration ofBacillus cereus in foods. —Appl. Microbiol., 15, 650–653.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraschi, T.F., Friend, M. &Bolles, D. — 1965.Erwinia-like microorganisms isolated from animal and human hosts. —Appl. Microbiol., 13, 128–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podgwaite, J.D. — 1980. Development and utilization of a nucleopolyhedrosis virus (Baculovirus) for control of the gypsy moth. —Mem. 8th, Reunion Nac. Control Biol., Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podgwaite, J.D. & Bruen, R.B. — 1978. Procedures for the microbiological examination of production batch preparations of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus (Baculovirus) of the gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar (L.) —U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Techn. Rep. Ne-38.

  • Podgwaite, J.D. &Campbell, R.W. — 1972. The disease complex of the gypsy moth. II. Aerobic bacterial pathogens. —J. Invertebr. Pathol., 20, 302–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfearn, M.S., Palleroni, N.J. &Stainer, R.Y. — 1966. A comparative study ofPseudomonas pseudomallei andBacillus mallei. —J. Gen. Microbiol., 43, 293–313.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M., Bell, R.A. & Owens, C.D. — 1981.In vivo mass production of gypsy moth nucleopolyhedrosis virus. In: The Gypsy Moth: Research Toward Integrated Pest Management. (C.C. Doane & M.L. McManus, ed.) —U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1584, 633–655.

  • Shapiro, M., Owens, C.D., Bell, R.A. &Wood, M.A. — 1980. Simplified efficient system forin vivo mass production of gypsy moth nucleopolyhedrosis virus. —J. Econ. Entomol., 74, 341–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skerman, V.D.B. — 1967. A Guide to the Identification of the Genera of Bacteria, 2nd ed. —Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, V.L., Vargo, V.L. &Finegold, S.M. — 1975. Wadsworth Anaerobic Bacteriology Manual. —Univ. California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. — 1975. Guidance for safety testing baculoviruses. In: Baculoviruses for Insect Pest Control: Safety Considerations (M. Summers, R. Engler, L. Falcon &P. Vail, ed.) —Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, D.C. 170–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Podgwaite, J.D., Bruen, R.B. & Shapiro, M. Microorganisms associated with production lots of the nucleopolyhedrosis virus of the gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar [Lep.: Lymantriidae] . Entomophaga 28, 9–15 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372092

Keywords

Navigation