Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Student understandings of acids and bases: A two year study

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

This study had indicated that further research needs to be done into the examination of how subsequent learning will interact with knowledge previously gained. Does the learning of new knowledge in relation to previously understood knowledge cause interference (Biggs & Telfer 1986) or does it result in some confusion culminating in lack of linkages (Osborne & Freyberg, 1985)? Can the benefits of constructivism be built upon when using other strategies? These are some of the questions which arise from the results obtained in this study. This study does not provide any definitive solution to the questions; however it does show that long term retention of concepts learnt using a constructivist strategy does occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BIGGS, J.B. & TELFER, R. (1986).The Process of Learning. Sydney: Prentice Hall of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRIVER, R. & OLDMAN, V. (1985)A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science. Paper prepared for the symposium “Personal Construction of Meaning in Educational Settings”, BERA, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAND, B. (1988a). Is conception conflict a viable teaching strategy?: the students' viewpoint.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 34 (4) 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAND, B. (1988b)Acids and Bases: Can Conceptual Conflict Change Misconceptions? Unpublished masters thesis. Perth: Curtin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAND, B. & TREAGUST, D. (1988). Application of a conceptual conflict strategy to enhance learning of acids and bases.Research in Science Education, 18, 53–63. Sydney: Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINSTRELL, J. (1984) Teaching for the development of understanding of ideas: forces on moving objects. In Anderson, C.W. (Ed.)Observing Science Classrooms: Observing Science Perspectives from Research and Practice. ERIC Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOVAK, J.D. (1987)Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSBORNE, R. & FREYBERG, P. (1985)Learning in Science: The Implications of Children's Science. Sydney, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • PINES, A.L., and WEST, L.H.T. (1986) Conceptual understanding and science learning: an interpretation of research within a source-of-knowledge framework.Science Education, 70, 583–604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Brian Hand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hand, B. Student understandings of acids and bases: A two year study. Research in Science Education 19, 133–144 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356853

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356853

Keywords

Search

Navigation