Abstract
Many applications in orthopaedic surgery require the creation of personalised design models that can serve as the basis for navigation in computer aided surgery systems or be used to create a personalised model to perform structural analysis during pre-operative planning or post-operative follow-up. The paper introduces a method for developing a three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific model of a femur bone from an antero-posterior radiograph. A generic femur was employed and was altered on the basis of bone boundaries visible on radiographs. Morphological errors were evaluated against 3D models obtained from computed tomography (CT) scans. When only the antero-posterior radiograph was used, the average radius estimation error was 4.8 mm, the average percentage area estimation error was 14%, and the average percentage estimation error for inertial moments was 15%. If both the medial-lateral and the anterior-posterior radiographs were used, these errors were 2.0 mm, 5% and 7%, respectively. The procedure described can be profitably employed whenever CT scans are not available, such as during a retrospective analysis, or when CT scans cannot be justified because of X-ray exposure and cost considerations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, F., Hammer, D. S., Pape, D., andKohn, D. (2002): ‘Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants’,Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.,122, pp. 262–268
Bargar, M. D. (1989): ‘Shape the implant to the patient’,Clin. Orthop.,249, pp. 73–78
Bert, J. M. (1996): ‘Custom total hip arthroplasty’,J. Arthroplasty,11, pp. 905–915
Bianco, P. T., Bechtold, J. E., Kyle, R. F., andGustilo, R. B. (1989): ‘Synthetic composite femurs for use in evaluation of torsional stability of cementless femoral prosthesis’, inTorzilli, P. A., andFriedman, M. H. (Eds): ‘Proc. Biomechanics Symposium’, (AMD, A.S.M.E., New York, USA), pp 297–300
Bignardi, C., Calderale, P. M., Giacosa, F., andIeropoli, O. (1995): ‘FEM analysis of bone-implant system by using videodensitometric measurements’, inPower, H., andHart, R. T. (Eds): Computer simulations in biomedicine’ (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, UK), pp. 301–308
Calderale, P. M., Cannas, M., Bignardi, C., Giacosa, F., Leonardi, F., Massè, A., andVivalda, P. (1993): ‘Biomechanical study of clinical results of orthopaedic implants by means of X-ray image observations’,Proc. 2nd Polish-Italian Seminar, Torino, Italy (Levrotto & Bella, Torino, Italy), pp. 107–114
Culmann, C. (1866): ‘Die graphische Statik’,Auflage, Meyer und Zeller, Zurich
Wolff, J. L. (1869): ‘Ueber die Bedeutung der Architectur der spongiösen Substanz’,Centralb. f. die med. Wissensch,54, pp. 849–851
Eckrich, S. G., Noble, P. C., andTullos, H. S. (1994): ‘Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal’,J. Arthroplasty,9, pp. 419–426
Eggers, E. A., andMctighe, T. (1993): ‘Can plain X-rays generate reliable data for identification and fabrication of custom implants?’.Proc 6th Meeting Int. Soc. for the Study of Custom Prostheses, Amelia Island, Florida, pp. 6–14
Hayes, D. E. E., Taylor, J. K., Paul, H. A., andBargar, W. L. (1991): ‘Errors of radiographic estimation of fit and fill of cementless femoral components’,Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc.,16, pp. 533–540
Husmann, O., Rubin, P. J., Leyvraz, P. F., De Roguin, B., and Argenson, J. N. (1997): ‘Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur’,J Arthroplasty,12, pp. 444–450
Iguchi, H., Hua, J., andWalker, P. S. (1996): ‘Accuracy of using radiographs for custom hip stem design’,J. Arthroplasty,11, pp. 312–321
Kaneuji, A., Matsumoto, T., Nishino, M., Miura, T., Sugimori, T., andTomita, K. (2000): ‘Three-dimensional morphological analysis of the proximal femoral canal, using computer-aided design systems, in Japanese patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip’,J. Orthop. Sci.,5, pp. 361–368
Kang, Y., Engelke, K., andKalender, W. A. (2003): ‘A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data’,IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.,22, pp. 586–598
Kerner, J., Huiskes, R., Van Lenthe, G. H., Weinans, H., Van Rietbergen, B., Engh, C. A., andAmis, A. A. (1999): ‘Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling’,J. Biomech.,32, pp. 695–703
Koch, J. C. (1917): ‘The laws of bone architecture-Part III’,Am. J. Anat.,21, pp. 215–298
Lengsfeld, M., Günther, D., Pressel, T., Leppek, R., Schmitt, J. andGriss, P. (2002): ‘Validation data for periprosthetic bone remodelling theories’,J. Biomech.,35, pp. 1553–1564
Mahaisavariya, B., Sitthiseripratip, K., Tongdee, T., Bohez, E. L., Vander Sloten, J., andOris, P. (2002): ‘Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering’,Med. Eng. Phys.,24, pp. 617–622
Milton, J. S., andArnold, J. S. (1995): ‘Principles and applications for engineering and the computing sciences’, (McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1995)
Noble, P. C., Alexander, J. W., Lindahl, L. I., Yew, D. T., Granberry, W. M., andTullos, H. S. (1988): ‘The anatomic basis of femoral component design’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,235, pp. 148–165
Orlik, J., Zhurov, A., andMiddleton, J. (2003): ‘On the secondary stability of coated cementless hip replacement: parameters that affected interface strength’,Med Eng Phys.,25, pp. 825–831
Roux, W. (1895): ‘Gesammelte Abhandlungen uber die Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen’, (W. Engelmann, Leipzig, 1895)
Rubin, P. J., Leyvraz, P. F., Aubaniac, J. M., Argenson, J. N., Esteve, P., andDe Roguin, B. (1992): ‘The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis’,J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.,74, pp. 28–32
Song, Y., Beaupre, G. S., andGoodman, S. B. (1999): ‘Osseointegration of total hip arthroplasties: studies in humans and animals’,J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants,9, pp. 77–112
Sutherland, C. J., Bresina, S. J., andGayou, D. E. (1994): ‘Use of general purpose mechanical computer assisted engineering software in orthopaedic surgical planning: advantages and limitations’,Comput. Med. Imaging. Graph.,18, pp. 435–442
Viceconti, M., Casali, M., Massari, B., Cristofolini, L., Bassini, S., andToni, A. (1996): ‘The ‘standardized femur program’. Proposal for a reference geometry to be used for the creation of finite element models of the femur’,J. Biomech.,29, pp. 1241–1250
Weinans, H., Sumner, D. R., Igloria, R., andNatarajan, R. N. (2000): ‘Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models’,J. Biomech.,33, pp. 809–817
Wissing, H., andBuddenbrock, B. (1993): ‘Determining rotational errors of the femur by axial computerized tomography in comparison with clinical and conventional radiologic determination’,Unfallchirurgie,19, pp. 145–157
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zanetti, E.M., Crupi, V., Bignardi, C. et al. Radiograph-based femur morphing method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 43, 181–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345952
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345952