Skip to main content
Log in

Therapy for inflammatory breast cancer: Impact of doxorubicin-based therapy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) carries an ominous prognosis. Before 1988, women with IBC at our institution were treated with neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with or without vincristine and prednisone (CMF/VP). After 1988, women with IBC were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (FAC). This study compares these two regimens with regard to response and survival.

Methods: The records of all women presenting between January 1973 and December 1991 with a stage IIIB (T4d, any N, MO) breast cancer with proven dermal lymphatic invasion by tumor cells were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: The study comprised 38 women; 28 received CMF (22 CMF, 6 CMF/VP), and 10 received FAC. The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy in the CMF/VP group was 57% (40% PR, 17% CR), and 100% (60% PR, 40% CR) in the FAC group. The median overall survival for women receiving CMF/VP was 18 months compared with 30 months for women receiving FAC (p=0.02). The median disease-free survivals for the CMF/VP and FAC groups were 6 and 24 months, respectively (p<0.001). When comparing responders and nonresponders with CMF/VP induction therapy, the responders had a significantly longer overall median survival (24 versus 10 months) (p<0.001) and disease-free median survival (8 versus 2 months) (p<0.001). All of the five patients remaining alive received FAC with 80% (four of five) having a complete response. These four patients subsequently underwent mastectomy and radiation.

Conclusion: This study suggests that a doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy regimen improves overall and disease-free median survivals when compared with the previously used CMF combination in the treatment of IBC. A favorable response to induction chemotherapy also appeared to be associated with an improved survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levine PH, Steinhorn SC, Ries LG, Aaron JL. Inflammatory breast cancer: the experience of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.J Natl Cancer Inst 1985;74:291–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell C.A System of Operative Surgery, vol 2. Hartford, Connecticut: Hale and Hosmer, 1814:136.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klotz H.Ueber mastitis carcinomatosa gravidarum et Lactantium. Halle, Germany: Lipke, 1869:30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leitch A. Peau d'orange in acute mammyary carcinoma. Its causes and diagnostic value.Lancet 1909;1:861–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Learmonth G. Acute mammary carcinoma (Volkman's mastitis carcinomatosis).Can Med Assoc J 1916;6:499–511.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schumann E. Carcinoma mastitoides.Ann Surg 1911;54:69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee BJ, Tannenbaum NE. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: a report of twenty-eight cases from the breast clinic of the Memorial Hospital.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1924;39:580–95.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor G, Meltzer A. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast 1938;33:33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bozzetti J, Saccozzi R, DeLena M, Salvadori B. Inflammatory cancer of the breast: analysis of 114 cases.J Surg Oncol 1981;18:355–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chris S. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: a report of 20 cases and a review of the literature.Br J Surg 1950;38:163–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer A, Dockerty M, Harrington S. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1948;87:417–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stocks L, Patterson F. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976;143:885–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barker J, Montague E, Peters L, et al. Clinical experience with irradiation of inflammatory carcinoma of the breast with and without elective chemotherapy.Cancer 1980;45:625–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dao T, McCarthy J. Treatment of inflammatory carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1957;105:289–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richards G, Lewiston E. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1961;113:729–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang C, Griscom N. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: Results following orthovoltage and supervoltage radiation therapy.Clin Radiol 1964;15:168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers C, Fitts W. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast. A critique of therapy.Surgery 1956;39:367–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barber K, Dockerty M, Clagett O. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1961;112:406–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Donegan W. Staging and end results. In: Spratt J Jr, Donegan W, eds.Cancer of the breast. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1967:117–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nussbaum H, Kagan A, Gilbert H, et al. Management of inflammatory breast carcinoma.Breast 1977;3:25–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–86.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cox D. Regression models and life-tables.J R Stat Soc B 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jaiyesimi I, Buzdar A, Hortobagyi G. Inflammatory breast cancer: a review.J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1014–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haagensen C.Diseases of the breast, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971:576–84.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rouesse J, Friedman S, Sarrazin D, et al. Primary chemotherapy in the treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: a study of 230 cases from the Institut Gustave-Roussey.J Clin Oncol 1986;4:1765–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chevallier B, Asselain B, Kunlin A, Veyret C, et al. Inflammatory breast cancer: determination of prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate analysis.Cancer 1987;60:897–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kohail H, Elias E, El-Noweim S, Bashirelahi N, et al. A multifactorial analysis of steroid hormone receptor in stage I and II breast cancer.Ann Surg 1985;201:61–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Veronesi A, Frustaci S, Tirelli U, et al. Tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer: efficacy at the primary tumor site in 46 evaluable patients.Tumori 1981;67:235–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sherry M, Johnson D, Page D, Greco F, et al. Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: clinical review and summary of the Vanderbilt experience with multi-modality therapy.Am J Med 1985;79:355–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Muss H, White D, Richards F, et al. Adriamycin versus methotrexate in five-drug combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.Cancer 1978;42:2141–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bull J, Tormey D, Li S, et al. A randomized comparative trial of adriamycin versus methotrexate in combination drug therapy.Cancer 1978;41:1649–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, R.L., Busch, E., Levine, E. et al. Therapy for inflammatory breast cancer: Impact of doxorubicin-based therapy. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2, 288–294 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307059

Key Words

Navigation