Skip to main content
Log in

A probability model for errors of classification. I. General considerations

Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to meet the need for a general treatment of the problem of error in classification. Within an m-attribute classificatory system, an object's typical subclass is that subclass to which it is most often allocated under repeated experimentally independent applications of the classificatory criteria. In these terms, an error of classification is an atypical subclass allocation. This leads to definition of probabilitiesO of occasional subclass membership, probabilitiesT of typical subclass membership, and probabilitiesE of error or, more generally, occasional subclass membership conditional upon typical subclass membership. In the relationshipf: (O, T, E) the relative incidence of independentO, T, andE values is such that generally one can specifyO values givenT andE, but one cannot generally specifyT andE values givenO. Under the restrictions of homogeneity ofE values for all members of a given typical subclass, mutual stochastic independence of errors of classification, and suitable conditions of replication, one can find particular systemsO =f(T, E) which are solvable forT andE givenO. A minimum of three replications of occasional classification is necessary for a solution of systems for marginal attributes, and a minimum of two replications is needed with any cross-classification. Although for such systems one can always specifyT andE values givenO values, the solution is unique for dichotomous systems only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Airy, G. B.On the algebraical and numerical theory of errors of observation and the combination of observations. Cambridge and London: McMillan, 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boring, E. G. The logic of the normal law of error in mental measurement.Amer. J. Psychol., 1920,31, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feller, W.An introduction to probability theory and its applications. (2nd. ed., vol. 1) New York: Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gulliksen, H.Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttman, L. The test-retest reliability of qualitative data.Psychometrika, 1946,11, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazarsfeld, P. F. Latent structure analysis. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: a study of science (vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scheffé, H.The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Solomon, H. (Ed.)Studies in item analysis and prediction. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spearman, C. Correlation calculated from faulty data.Brit. J. Psychol. 1910,3, 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yule, G. U. and Kendall, M. G.An introduction to the theory of statistics. (11th ed.) London: Griffin, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With grateful acknowledgement to the Rockefeller Foundation; and to the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, for N. I. M. H. Grant M-3950.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutcliffe, J.P. A probability model for errors of classification. I. General considerations. Psychometrika 30, 73–96 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289748

Keywords

Navigation