Skip to main content
Log in

Geometry as a basis for finite element automation

  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of geometry in achieving automation of the overall finite element analysis process. Emphasis is placed on the geometry requirements for two of the key technologies within this process: fully automatic mesh generation and adaptive analysis. A geometric framework that permits the implementation of automated finite element procedures is presented. This includes high-level geometry-based problem specification and control, powerful data structures, and the geometric functionality that is necessary to support automation. An open architecture system, called TAGUS, which incorporates these notions and permits manipulation of geometry, topology, and attribute data from within an applications program, is also presented. In addition, the paper contrasts the geometry requirements of problems with static domains versus the special considerations that must be given for dynamically changing domains. Finally, a view of an integrated system architecture for analysis automation is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Weiler (1986) Topological Structures for Geometry Modeling, PhD thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY

  2. Cavendish, J.C.; Field, D.A.; Frey, W.H. (1985) An approach to automatic three-dimensional finite element mesh generation. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 21, 329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen, V.P. (1982) Automatic mesh generation with tetrahedron elements. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 18, 273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woo, T.C.; Thomasma, T. (1984) An algorithm for generating solid elements in objects with holes. Comput. Struct. 8(2), 333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wordenweber, B. (1980) Volume Triangulation, CAD Group Document No. 110, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, Cambridge, CB2 3QG, England

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sluiter, M.L.C.; Hansen, D.C. (1982) A general purpose automatic mesh generator for shell and solid finite elements. Comput. Eng. 3, 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yerry, M.A.; Shephard, M.S. (1985) Automatic three-dimensional mesh generation by the modified-octree technique. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 20, 1965–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kela, A.; Perucchio, R.; Voelcker, H.B. (1986) Toward automatic finite element analysis. Comput. Mech. Engr. 5(1), 57–71

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sibson, R. (1978) Locally equiangular triangulations. Comput. J. 21(3), 243–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, Y.T.; Requicha, A.A.G. (1982) Algorithms for computing the volume and other integral properties of solids. Commun. ACM 25(9), 635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kela, A. (in press) Hierarchical octree approximations for boundary representation based geometric models. Comput. Aided Des.

  12. Schroeder, W.J. ; Shephard, M.S. (1989) A combined octree/Delaunay method for fully automatic 3-D mesh generation. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng.

  13. Babuska, I.; Zienkiewicz, O.C., Gago, J.; Oliveira, E.R. de A. (1986) Accuracy estimates and adaptive refinements in finite element computations. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diaz, A. R.; Kikuchi, N.; Taylor, J.E. (1983) Optimization for finite element methods. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 37, 29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Babuska, I.; Rheinboldt, W. C. (1980) Reliable error estimation and mesh adaptation for the finite element method. (Ed. J.T. Oden). Comput. Meth. Nonlin. Mech. 67–108

  16. Vanderplaats, G. (1984) Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finnigan, P.M., Kela, A. & Davis, J.E. Geometry as a basis for finite element automation. Engineering with Computers 5, 147–160 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274209

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274209

Keywords

Navigation