Skip to main content
Log in

Circardian latency variability of sympathetic skin responses

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Clinical Autonomic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) have been increasingly used as tests for autonomic function in the clinical setting. In spite of the known circadian rhythmicity of sympathetic function, however, normative studies have not addressed the possibility of circadian variability of SSR parameters. Ten normal volunteers (7 men, 3 women, aged 19 to 43) had SSR testing performed in the morning, at noon, and in the early evening, and response latencies and amplitudes were compared for the different day periods. Although amplitude values varied in a random fashion, regardless of the time of testing, there was a statistically significant variability in response latencies, which were, on the average, approximately 150 ms shorter in the morning trials, as compared to the early evening ones. This difference was statistically significant (ANOVA, p<0.01). We propose that circadian variability of SSR latencies should be taken into account in normative studies of SSR parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Drory VE, Korczyn AD. Sympathetic skin response: age effect.Neurology 1993;43:1818–1820.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gutrecht JA: Sympathetic skin response.J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:519–524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu P, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response—a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies.J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1984; 47:536–542.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kimura J. Anatomy and physiology of the peripheral nerve. In: Kimura J, ed.:Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1983:59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Refinetti R, Menaker M. The circadian rhythm of body temperature.Physiol Behav 1992;51:613–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanes DP, Schall JD: Neural control of voluntary movement initiation.Science 1996;274:427–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore RY. Organization and function of a central nervous system circadian oscillator: the suprachiasmatic hypothalamic nucleus.Federation Proceedings 1983;42:2783–2789.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kafka SM, Wirz-Justice A, Naber D, Moore RY, Benedito MA. Circadian rhythms in rat brain neurotransmitter receptors.Federation Proceedings 1983;42:2796–2801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brasil-Neto, J.P., Gonçalves, C.A., Araújo, C.D. et al. Circardian latency variability of sympathetic skin responses. Clinical Autonomic Research 8, 237–239 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02267787

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02267787

Keywords

Navigation