Skip to main content
Log in

Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A forced choice paradigm was used to measure the capacity of human subjects to discriminate the curvature of stimuli applied passively to the skin of an immobilized finger. The stimuli consisted of spherically curved segments with a base radius of 2.5 mm; thus the area of contact with the fingerpad skin was approximately 19.6 mm2 for all stimuli. There were 2 series of experiments. In series 1, the standard surface had a curvature of 286 m−1 (radius of curvature 3.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 13%. In series 2, the standard had a curvature of 154 m−1 (radius 6.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 18%. Thus, even when the contact area between the surface and the skin was invariant, humans were able to discriminate small changes in curvature using only information from the cutaneous receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgess PR, Wei JY, Clark FJ, Simon J (1982) Signaling of kinesthetic information by peripheral sensory receptors. Ann Rev Neurosci 5:171–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson PW (1972) Haptic judgments of curvature by blind and sighted humans. J Exp Psychol 93:43–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fearing RS, Binford TO (1988) Using a cylindrical tactile sensor for determining curvature. Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 765–771

  • Goodwin AW, John KT, Marceglia AH (1991) Tactile discrimination of curvature by humans using only cutaneous information from the fingerpads. Exp Brain Res 86:663–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IE, Morison V (1982) The haptic perception of curvature. Percept Psychophys 31:446–450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurfinkel VS, Shneyder AYu, Kanayev YeM, Gurfinkel YeV (1974) Tactile sensitizing of manipulators. Eng Cybern 12:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KO (1980) Sensory discrimination: decision process. J Neurophysiol 43:1771–1792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte RH, Srinivasan MA (1987a) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1655–1671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte RH, Srinivasan MA (1987b) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1672–1681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips CG (1986) Movements of the hand. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards W, Dawson B, Whittington D (1986) Encoding contour shape by curvature extrema. J Opt Soc Am 3:1483–1491

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland PE, Mortensen E (1987) Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man. Brain Res Rev 12:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH (1987) Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step indented into the monkey fingerpad. J Neurosci 7:1682–1697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH (1990) Encoding of shape in the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. In: Franzen O, Westman J (eds) Information processing in the somatosensory system. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodwin, A.W., Wheat, H.E. Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant. Exp Brain Res 88, 447–450 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259120

Key words

Navigation