Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive validity of the potentiated startle response as a behavioral model for anxiolytic drugs

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fear-potentiated startle (PSR) paradigm is a putative behavioral model for the determination of anxiolytic properties of drugs. The present study further investigated the predictive validity of the model. Predictive validity is high, when only drugs clinically used as anxiolytics attenuate PSR dose dependently. Results showed that startle potentiation decreased dose dependently after the administration of the anxiolytics CDP (2.5–10 mg/kg, IP) and alprazolam (1–3 mg/kg, IP). After administration of the clinically non-anxiolytic drugs amitriptyline (2.5–10 mg/kg, IP), carbamazepine (5–20 mg/kg, IP), fentanyl (0.0025–0.04 mg/kg, SC), naloxone (2.5–10 mg/kg, IP), nicotine (0.4–1.6 mg/kg, IP), alcohol (500–2000 mg/kg, IP), andd-amphetamine (0.6–2.4 mg/kg, IP), a dose-dependent decrease in startle potentiation was not found. The PSR correctly discriminated most of the drugs tested in clinically anxiolytic and clinically non-anxiolytic drugs. However, haloperidol behaved as a false positive, and results of nicotine and alcohol were at variance with results reported by others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg WK, Davis M (1985) Associative learning modifies startle reflexes at the lateral lemniscus. Behav Neurosci 99:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassella JV, Davis M (1985) Fear-enhanced acoustic startle is not attenuated by acute or chronic imipramine treatment in rats. Psychopharmacology 87:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1979a) Diazepam and flurazepam: effects on conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm. Psychopharmacology 62:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1979b) Morphine and naloxone: effects of conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm. Eur J Pharmacol 54:341–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1986) Pharmacological and anatomical analysis of fear conditioning using the fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Behav Neurosci 100:814–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1992a) The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety. Annu Rev Neurosci 15:353–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1992b) The role of the amygdala in fear-potentiated startle: implications for animal models of anxiety. Trends Pharmacol Sci 13:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Gendelman DS, Tischler MD, Gendelman PM (1982) A primary acoustic startle circuit: lesion and stimulation studies. J Neurosci 6:791–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Cassella JV, Kehne JH (1988) Serotonin does not mediate anxiolytic effects of buspirone in the fear-potentiated startle paradigm: comparison with 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone. Psychopharmacology 94:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Halgren E (1992) Emotional neurophysiology of the amygdala within the context of human cognition. In: Agleton JP (ed) The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotions, memory, and mental dysfunction. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 191–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijzen TH, Slangen JL (1989) Effects of midazolam, DMCM and lindane on potentiated startle in the rat. Psychopharmacology 99:362–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock JM, Davis M (1986) Lesions of the amygdala, but not of the cerebellum or red nucleus, block conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm. Behav Neurosci 100:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock JM, Davis M (1991) Efferent pathway of the amygdala involved in conditioned fear as measured with the fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Behav Neurosci 105:826–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehne JH, Cassella JV, Davis M (1988) Anxiolytic effects of buspirone and gepirone in the fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Psychopharmacology 94:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux JE (1987) Emotion. In: Mountcastle VB (ed) Handbook of physiology, Section 1: The nervous system. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 419–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbach RS, Geyer MA (1988) Blockade of potentiated startle responding in rats by 5-hydroxytryptaminelA receptor ligands. Eur J Pharmacol 156:375–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla RA (1967) Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev 74:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen JB, Davis M (1990) Enhancement of electrically elicited startle by amygdaloid stimulation. Physiol Behav 48:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen JB, Hitchcock JM, Sananes CB, Davis M (1991) A direct projection from the central nucleus of the amygdala to the acoustic startle pathway: anterograde and retrograde tracing studies. Behav Neurosci 105:817–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamone JD (1992) Behavioral pharmacology of dopamine systems: A new synthesis. In: Agleton JP (ed) The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotions, memory, and mental dysfunction. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 599–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel-Kruger J, Willner P (1991) The mesolimbic system: principles of operation. In: Willner P, Scheel-Kruger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action. Wiley, New York, pp 559–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson CA, Wilkinson LO (1983) Behavioral evidence that nicotine administration has anxiolytic actions. Society for Neurosci Abstr 9:137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hijzen, T.H., Houtzager, S.W.J., Joordens, R.J.E. et al. Predictive validity of the potentiated startle response as a behavioral model for anxiolytic drugs. Psychopharmacology 118, 150–154 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245833

Key words

Navigation