Skip to main content
Log in

Event-related potential components N1, P2 and P3 to rare and frequent stimuli in intellectually impaired neurological patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Event-related potentials (ERPs) and attention performance data were collected in an auditory oddball paradigm from 24 intellectually impaired neurological patients, and compared with normal controls (n=19). For the ERP components N1, P2 and P3, reference-independent measures (latency, global field power, current density at Cz, location of extreme potential, centroid location) were determined for the target stimulus and for the preceding and the following two “frequent” stimuli. In 8 of the 45 measures obtained, patients and controls differed significantly. To target stimuli, patients had shorter N1 latency and smaller current density, more posterior P2 location and longer P3 latency; to immediately following “frequent” stimuli, longer P2 latency; and to preceding and both following “frequent” stimuli, smaller P2 current density. Attention performance was significantly worse for the 15 patients who scored on at least one of the eight ERP measures above normal range than for the other 9 patients. Decreased N1 latency to targets is viewed as failure to activate normal attentional capacity; changed P2 location suggests activation of deviant neuronal populations in response to targets; and increased post-target P2 latency suggests abnormal persistence of induced state change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball SS, Marsh JT, Schubarth G, Brown WS, Standburg R (1989) Longitudinal P300 latency changes in Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol 44:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown WS, Marsh JT, LaRue A (1982) Event-related potentials in psychiatry: differentiating depression and dementia in the elderly. Bull Los Ang Neurol Soc. 47:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman JA, Torello MW (1989) Event-related potential (N100) studies in depressed patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy. In: Maurer K (ed) Topographic brain mapping of EEG and evoked potentials. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 474–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin DS (1990) Clinical utility of long latency “cognitive” event-related potentials (P3): the pros. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ (1986) Electrophysiological differences between subtypes of dementia. Brain 109:1103–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon E, Kraiuhin C, Harris A, Meares R, Howson A (1986) The differential diagnosis of dementia using P300 latency. Biol Psychiatry 21:1123–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummow LJ, Dustman RE, Keaney RP (1986) Cerebrovascular accident alters P300 event-related potential characteristics. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 63:128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansch EC, Syndulko K, Cohen SN, Goldberg ZI, Potvin AR, Tourtellotte WW (1982) Cognition in Parkinson's disease: an event-related potential perspective. Ann Neurol 11:599–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirata K, Lehmann D (1989) N1 and P2 of frequent and rare event-related potentials show effects and after-effects of the attended target in the oddball-paradigm. Int J Psychophysiol 9:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito J, Yamao S, Fukuda H, Mimori Y, Nakamura S (1990) The P-300 event-related potentials in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Correlations between P300 and monoamine metabolites. Clin Neurophysiol 77:174–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann D (1987) Principles of spatial analysis. In: Gevins AS, Remond A (eds) EEG handbook, revised series, vol I, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 309–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann D, Skrandies W (1979) Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemi-retinal systems. Exp Brain Res 35:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann D, Skrandies W (1980) Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 48:609–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann D, Meles H, Mir Z (1977) Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemiretina: latency differences. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43: 725–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Mita T, Lehmann D, Skrandies W (1983) P300 in brain-damaged patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:22P

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Wenegrat BG, Roth WT, Kopell BS (1984a) Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. I. Normal aging Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 59:85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfefferbaum A, Wenegrat BG, Ford JM, Roth WT, Kopell BS (1984b) Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. II. Demential, depression and schizophrenia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 59:104–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Kraemer HC (1990) Clinical utility of long latency “cognitive” event-related potentials (P3): the cons. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Picton TW, Hillyard SA (1974) Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 36:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Polich J, Ehlers CL, Otis S, Mandell AJ, Bloom FE (1986) P300 latency reflects the degree of cognitive decline in dementing illness. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 63:138–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Polich J, Ladish C, Bloom FE (1990) P300 assessment of early Alzheimer's disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 77: 179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosvold HE (1956) A continuous performance test of brain damage. J Consult Psychol 20:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth WT, Krainz PL, Ford JM, Tinkerberg JR, Rothbart RM, Kopell B (1976) Parameters of temporal recovery of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 40:623–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth WT, Horvath TB, Pfefferbaum A, Kopell BS (1980) Event-related potentials in schizophrenics. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 48:127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies W (1987) The upper and lower visual field of man: electrophysiological and functional differences. Prog Sens Physiol 8:1–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaets JP, Fortgens C (1984) On the value of P300 event-related potentials in the differential diagnosis of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 145:652–656

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Claire DM, Blackwood DH, Christie JE (1985) P3 and other long latency auditory evoked potentials in presenile dementia Alzheimer type and alcoholic Korsakoff syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 147:702–706

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirata, K., Pal, I. & Lehmann, D. Event-related potential components N1, P2 and P3 to rare and frequent stimuli in intellectually impaired neurological patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 240, 240–245 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189533

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189533

Key words

Navigation