Skip to main content
Log in

Sequences and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi on birch

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Soil cores collected under a birch tree (Betula pubescens) on an experimental plot showed a progressive change in types of sheathing mycorrhiza with distance from the tree base. Seedlings grown in cores in a glasshouse also developed different mycorrhizal types depending on distance from the tree at which the cores were taken, but the types on seedlings were often different from those in the parent cores. When cores were taken directly beneath fruitbodies and sown to birch in a glasshouse, seedlings developed mycorrhizas of Laccaria, Inocybe and Hebeloma in cores from beneath these fruitbodies, but they seldom developed Lactarius mycorrhizas and never developed Leccinum mycorrhizas in cores taken beneath these fruitbodies. Similarly, when seedlings were grown in soils supplemented with vermiculite-peat inocula in a glasshouse, Laccaria and Hebeloma readily formed mycorrhizas, butLactarius pubescens seldom did so and Leccinum andAmanita muscaria never dit so. Yet all these fungi form mycorrhizas on birch seedlings in aseptic conditions.

The results suggest a distinction between ‘early stage’ and ‘late stage’ mycorrhizal fungi of birch. Early stage fungi readily infect seedlings from resident or introduced inoculum in normal, unsterile soil, whereas late stage fungi do not readily form mycorrhizas in these conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleming L V 1983 Succession of mycorrhizal fungi on birch: infection of seedlings planted around mature trees. Plant and Soil 71, 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ford E D, Mason P A and Pelham J 1980 Spatial patterns of sporophore distribution around a young birch tree in three successive years. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 75, 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fox F M 1983 Role of basidiospores as inocula of mycorrhizal fungi of birch. Plant and Soil 71, 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harper J E and Webster J 1964 An experimental analysis of the coprophilous fungus succession. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 47, 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Last F T, Mason P A, Wilson J, Deacon J W and Walker C 1983 Succession: Its relevance when selecting sheathing mycorrhizal fungi for inoculating young trees. Nature London (in press).

  6. Mason P A, Dighton J, Last F T and Wilson J 1983 Procedure for establishing sheathing mycorrhizas in tree seedlings. For. Ecol. Manage. 5, 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mason P A, Last F T, Pelham J and Ingleby K 1982 Ecology of some fungi associated with an ageing stand of birch (Betula pendula andB. pubescens). For. Ecol. Manage. 4, 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deacon, J.W., Donaldson, S.J. & Last, F.T. Sequences and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi on birch. Plant Soil 71, 257–262 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182660

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182660

Key words

Navigation