Abstract
The mechanism of resistance toB toxicity in barley and wheat was studied in a solution culture experiment using several cultivars displaying a large range of sensitivity to excessB supply. Plants were cultured for 35 d atB concentrations ranging from normal to excessive (15 to 5000 μM, respectively) then examined for dry matter production and theB distribution between roots and shoots.
In both species, increasedB supply was accompanied by increased tissueB concentrations, development ofB toxicity symptoms and depressed growth. At each level ofB supply, however, resistant cultivars accumulated considerably lessB than did sensitive cultivars, in both roots and shoots. Even at the lowestB supply, at which noB toxicity symptoms developed and growth was not affected, resistant cultivars maintained relatively low tissueB concentrations. No cultivar displayed an ability to tolerate high tissueB concentrations.
These results indicate that sensitivity toB toxicity in barley and wheat is governed by the ability of cultivars to excludeB. If theB concentrations of tissues is used to indicate resistance toB toxicity, then cultivars have the same ranking whether cultured at a normal or excessB supply.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowen J E and Nissen P 1976 Boron uptake by excised barley roots I. Uptake into the free space. Plant Physiol. 57, 353–357.
Cartwright B and Hirsch M 1986 Boron toxicity in barley and wheat — a disorder resembling foliar disease. Dept. Agric., South Aust. Fact Sheet No. FS 8/86.
Cartwright B, Rathjen A J, Sparrow D H B, Paull J G and Zarcinas B A 1987 Boron tolerance in Australian varieties of wheat and barley.In Genetic Specificity of Mineral Nutritin in Plants. Eds. B C Loughman, L H Gabelman. pp 139–151. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Cartwright B and Zarcinas B A 1987 Toxic concentrations of boron in South Australian barley crops. CSIRO Aus., Div. Soils Div. Rep. No. 86.
Cartwright B, Zarcinas B A and Mayfield A H 1984 Toxic concentrations of boron in a red-brown earth at Gladstone, South Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 22, 261–272.
Cartwright B, Zarcinas B A and Spouncer L R 1986 Boron toxicity in South Australian barley crops. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37, 351–359.
Eaton F M 1944 Deficiency, toxicity, and accumulation of boron in plants. J. Agric. Res. 69, 237–277.
Kluge R and Podlesak W 1985 Plant critical levels for the evaluation of boron toxicity in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant and Soil 83, 381–388.
Mehrotra O N, Srivastava R D L and Mishra P H 1980 Some observations on the relative tolerance of wheat genotypes to boron. Indian Agric. 24, 223–238.
Nable R O 1988 Effects of boron toxicity upon the mineral nutrient composition of barley and wheat cultivars. CSIRO Aust., Div. Soils Div. Rep. No. 105.
Passioura J B 1977 Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 43, 117–120.
Paull J G, Cartwright B and Rathjen A J 1987 Responses of wheat and barley genotypes to toxic concentrations of soil boron. Euphytica (in press).
Rathjen A J, Cartwright B, Paull J G, Moody D B and Lewis J 1987 Breeding for tolerance of mineral toxicities with special reference to boron.In Perspectives and Priorities in Plant Production Research. Eds. P G E Searle and B G Davey. Sydney University Press. Australia.
Raven J A 1980 Short-and long-distance transport of boric acid in plants. New Phytol. 84, 231–249.
Ryan T A, Joiner B L and Ryan B F 1982 Minitab reference manual. Statistics Dept., Pennsylvania State Univ., USA 16802.
Zarcinas B A and Cartwright B 1983 Analysis of soil and plant material by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. CSIRO Aust., Div. Soils. Tech. Paper No. 45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nable, R.O. Resistance to boron toxicity amongst several barley and wheat cultivars: A preliminary examination of the resistance mechanism. Plant Soil 112, 45–52 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181751
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181751