Summary
Blinded crabs (Carcinus maenas andMaja verrucosa) show compensatory eye stalk movements on rotation about a vertical axis, in water and in air. On a sudden arrest of the turntable typical after-effects are observed, which show a striking resemblance to those known from vertebrates. All these reactions are abolished after bilateral elimination of the so-called thread hairs within the statocysts (experiments onMaja). In fresh preparations these hairs can be seen to follow the slightest movements of the surrounding fluid, swaying around their point of attachment.
Elimination of the thread hairs does not diminish, but does markedly delay the compensatory eye stalk movements of a blinded crab on rotation about horizontal axes. The latter reactions are abolished if in addition the hook hairs (i.e. the sense hairs of the statolith-bearing type) are destroyed.
It is concluded that the statocyst of crabs is a staticdynamic sense organ: the hook hairs are position receptors, the thread hairs react to angular displacements about all three main body axes; the group hairs may have no sensory function at all.
Rotation sense may be expected to occur in other Crustacea possessing thread hairs or similar receptors in their statocysts as well.
References
S. Dijkgraaf, Exper.11, 1955 (im Druck).
A. Bethe, Arch. Mikr. Anat. Entw.gesch.50, 460 (1897);51, 382 (1898).
W. v. Buddenbrock undH. Friedrich, Z. vgl. Physiol.19, 747 (1933).
H. Schoene, Z. vgl. Physiol.36, 241 (1954).
Sie wird sogar inv. Buddenbrocks neuer Sinnesphysiologie (Vergleichende Physiologie, Bd. I [Birkhäuser Basel, 1952]) mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Ausser den bereits zitierten Autoren zum BeispielM. Sesar,Die Statocysten der Brachyuren (Diss. München 1927).
C. W. Prentiss, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard Coll.36, 167 (1901).
V. Hensen, Z. wiss. Zool.13, 1 (1863).
F. Doflein,Brachyura, Wiss. Erg. Exped. Valdivia6, 1904.
H. Kinzig-Conrad, Verh. Naturhist. Medizin. Ver. Heidelberg [NF]14, 1 (1921).
C. W. Prentiss, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard Coll.36, 167 (1901).
Siehe auchV. Hensen, Z. wiss. Zool.13, 1 (1863).
H. Kinzig-Conrad, Verh. Naturhist. Medizin. Ver. Heidelberg [NF.]14, 1 (1921).
Siehe zum BeispielA. Bethe, Arch. Mikr. Anat. Entw.gesch.50, 460 (1897);51, 382 (1898).
Während dieser Prüfungen befand sich das Tier immer unter Wasser. Ausserhalb des Wassers verursachte das Gewicht der markierten Augenstiele störende Abweichungen bei Stellungsänderungen; auch hielt das Tier die Augenstiele dann häufig eingeklappt.
V. Hensen, Z. wiss. Zool.13, 1 (1863), Anhang (S. 83/84).
M. J. Cohen, Biol. Bull.105, 363 (1953).
AusE. P. Lyons nicht ganz klarer Darstellung scheint hervorzugehen, dass auchAstacus fluviatilis Rotationssinn bei Drehung um die Hochachse erkennen lässt (Amer. J. Physiol.3, 86 [1900]).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dijkgraaf, S. Rotationssinn nach dem Bogengangsprinzip bei Crustaceen. Experientia 11, 407–409 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02158510
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02158510