Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of movement and illusion of movement on human vestibulomotor response

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Lateral stabilographic response to galvanic labyrinth stimulation was investigated in healthy subjects in the standing position. Vestibulomotor response increased during forwards volitional body tilt as well as involuntary tilt occurring in response to stimulating (by vibration) the proprioceptors of the anterior tibial muscles. An illusion of the forward body tilt induced by stimulating (vibrating) the proprioceptors of the triceps surae muscles with the trunk fastened in a fixed position was accompanied by practically the same intensification of vestibulomotor response as during actual body movement. It was concluded that reinforcement of vestibulomotor response during volitional movements is brought about by the spatial perception system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. K. V. Baev, “Active selection of afferent information — the principle underlying peripheral correction of the operation of rhythmic movement generators,” Neirofiziologiya,16, No. 3, 343–353 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. S. Gurfinkel' M. I. Lipshits, and K. E. Popov, “Investigating the erect posture control system by vibrational stimulation of muscle spindles,” Fiziol. Cheloveka,3, No. 3, 635–643 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. E. Popov, B. N. Smetanin, V. S. Gurfinkel', et al., “Spatial perception and vestibulomotor response in man,” Neirofiziologiya,18, No. 6, 779–787 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. N. Smetanin, V. Yu. Shlukov, and M. P. Kudinova, “Facilitatory action of volitional movement on vestibulomotor response in man,” Fiziol. Cheloveka,12, No. 1, 133–140 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Somjen, Sensory Coding in the Mamalian Nervous System, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. I. Adkins, R. W. Morse, and A. L. Towe, “Control of somatosensory input by cerebral cortex,” Science,153, No. 3733, 1020–1022 (1966).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Bianconi and J. R. Meulen, “The response to vibration of the end organ of mammalian muscle spindles,” J. Neurophysiol.,26, No. 1, 177–190 (1963).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Burke, K.-E Hagbarth, L. Löfstedt, and B. G. Wallin, “The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles,” J. Physiol.,261, No. 3, 673–693 (1976).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Eklund, “General features of vibration-induced effects on balance”, Uppsala J. Med. Sci.,77, No. 1, 112–124 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. M. Goodwin, D. I. McCloskey, and P. B. C. Matthews, “The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralyzing joint afferents,” Brain,95, No. 4, 705–748 (1972).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Lund and C. Broberg, “Effects of different head positions on postural sway in man induced by a reproducible vestibular error signan,” Acta Physiol. Scand.,117, No. 2, 307–309 (1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Institute for Research into Information Transmission, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 250–255, March–April, 1988.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smetanin, B.N., Popov, K.E., Gurfinkel, V.S. et al. Effect of movement and illusion of movement on human vestibulomotor response. Neurophysiology 20, 192–196 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02141337

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02141337

Keywords

Navigation