Skip to main content
Log in

In search of a “Non-citation index” indicator for scientific activity assessment in less developed countries. Case study of Croatia/Yugoslavia

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

“Unquestionably, there has been no one like Einstein in physics in this century, but one has to reflect on how easily Einstein might have been lost, particularly if he had been born in a developing country.”

Abstract

The meaning of the term the intellectual “island effect” which was introduced byArunachalam et al. is broadened as to characterize the status of science on the periphery in general. A practical solution is proposed, based on bibliometric data of the research output and relying on two criteria: the extent of coverage by world significant secondary literature and the extent of scatter of that literature. Reliability of the publication data retrieved from the Citation Indexes is discussed; a measure is offered to assess the adequacy of the Citation Indexes as the data sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. M. RABKIN, H. INHABER, Science on the periphery: A citation study of three less developed countries,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. J. MORAVCSIK, Science Development, The Building of Science in Less Developed Countries, International Development Research Center, Bloomington, Ind., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. MORAVCSIK, Applied scientometrics: An assessment methodology for developing countries,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Strengthening the Coverage of Third World Science, The Final Report of the Philadelphia Workshop, July 1985.

  5. L. PYENSON, M. SINGH, Physics on the periphery: A world survey, 1920–1929,Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 279.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. ARUNACHALAM, S. MARKANDAY, Science in the middle-level countries: A bibliometric analysis of scientific journals of Australia, Canada, India, and Israel,Journal of Information Science, 3 (1981) No. 1, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. W. LANCASTER, R. MEHROTRA, K. OTSU, Some publication patterns in Indian and Japanese science: A bibliometric comparison,International Forum for Information and Documentation, 9 (1984) No. 4, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. M. RABKIN, T. O. EISEMON, J.-J. LAFITTE-HOUSSAT, E. McLEAN RATHGEBER, Citation visibility of Africa's science,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 499.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. H. DAVIS, Institutional sectors of “Mainstream” science production in Subsaharan Africa, 1970–1979: A quantitative analysis,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. B. P. de CARVALHO, A. de ALBUQUERQUE BARRETO, Scientific and technical communication in Brazil: Statistical indicators for primary publications,Proceedings 43rd ASIS Annual Meeting, 17 (1980) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. VELHO, J. KRIGE, Publication and citation practices of Brazilian agricultural scientists,Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984) No. 1, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. ARUNACHALAM, Citation counts as indicators of the science & technology capacity of Third World nations,Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the AAAS, Los Angeles, May 1985, 1–12.

  13. S. ARUNACHALAM, M. K. DHIRENDRA RAO, P. K. SHRIVASTAVA, Physics research in Israel — A preliminary bibliometric analysis,Journal of Information Science, 8 (1984) No. 3, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. AL-KHARAFI, N. EL-RAYYES, G. JANINI, Science research in Kuwait — A bibliometric analysis,Journal of Information Science, 13 (1987) No. 1, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. BALOG, Citation frequencies of New Zealand and Australian scientific journals,Journal of Information Science, 2 (1980) No. 5, 233.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. STEFANIAK, Bibliometric and scientometric searching of the scientific and technical Polish literature by using data bases of the capitalist countries (in Russian),Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Ser. 1, (1983) No. 8, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. ARUNACHALAM, K. C. GARG, A small country in a world of big science: A preliminary bibliometric study of science in Singapore,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. MENDEZ, I. GOMEZ, The Spanish scientific productivity through eight international data bases,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. FERREIRO ALAEZ, G. LOPEZAGUADO, R. VIESCA, International integration of Spanish authors in physics,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B 36 (1986) No. 1, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. PRAVDIĆ, V. OLUIĆ-VUKOVIČ, T. TÓTH, Bibliometric analysis of contributions by scientists from Croatia (Yugoslavia) in the field of chemistry: Rank-frequency distribution,Kemija u industriji, 31 (1982) No. 7, 351.

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. MIHEL, V. OLUIĆ-VUKOVIČ, N. PRAVDIĆ, The application of bibliometric laws in analysis of broad thematic fields: Papers from the humanities,Informatologia Yugoslavica, 16 (1984) Nos. 1–2, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. BLICKENSTAFF, M. J. MORAVCSIK, Scientific output in the Third World,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. TODOROV, Distribution of physics literature,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 195.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. VLACHÝ, Publication output and citation of developing countries in physics,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B 35 (1985) 1201.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. GARFIELD, Mapping science in the Third World,Science and Public Policy, 10 (1983) No. 3, 112.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT,Scientometric Indicators, World Scientific, Singapore-Philadelphia, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. J. MORAVCSIK,How to Grow Science, Universe Books New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. PRAVDIĆ, V. OLUIĆ-VUKOVIĆ, Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. V. OLUIĆ-VUKOVIĆ, T. TÓTH, N. PRAVDIĆ, Analysis of scientific productivity of chemists from Croatia (Yugoslavia) (in Croatian),Kemija u industriji, 32 (1983) No. 5, 205.

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. KLAIČ, Scientometric analysis of scientific and educational activities of chemists at the Rudjer Bošković Institute, for the period 1961–1983 (in Croatian),Kemija u industriji, 35 (1986) No. 3, 141.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. W. HILL, Ten years on: IFID and its times,International Forum for Information and Documentation, 10 (1985) No. 4, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. D. FRAME, Measuring scientific activity in lesser developed countries,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. PRAVDIĆ, D. KRITOVAC, A. AGANOVIĆ-BORAS, Publications based on dissertations defended at the University of Zagreb in the period 1950–1980,Informatologia Yugoslavica, 19 (1987) Nos 3–4, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. I. YABLONSKY, On fundamental regularities of the distribution of scientific productivity,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. V. OLUIĆ-VUKOVIĆ, personal communication.

  36. S. M. LAWANI, Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. T. SARAČEVIĆ, Perception of the needs for scientific and technical information in less developed countries,Journal of Documentation, 36 (1980) No. 3, 214.

    Google Scholar 

  38. F. W. LANCASTER, J. M. NEWAY, The future of indexing and abstracting services,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (1982) No. 3, 183.

    Google Scholar 

  39. O. PERSSON, Online bibliometrics. A research tool for every man,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. H. ETO, P. M. CANDELARIA, Applicability of the Bradford distribution to international science and technology indicators,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 27.

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. JAGODZINSKI-SIGOGNEAU J-P. COURTIAL, B. LATOUR, How to measure the degree of independence of a research system?,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 119.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. SPAVENTI, N. TUDOR-ŠILOVIĆ, S. MARIČIĆ, M. LABUS, Bibliometric analysis of some scientific periodicals from Yugoslavia (in Croatian),Informatologia Yugoslavica, 11 (1979) Nos. 3–4, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. MARIČIĆ, A fourfold bibliometric evaluation of journals from less developed scientific communities — The pattern of references in medical journals from Yugoslavia,Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30 (1983) No. 2, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Z. PENAVA, Science Citation Index (SCI) and the reflection of papers in the field of biology published in Yugoslav journals by scientists from Croatia (in Croatian),Acta Botanica Croatica, 43 (1984) 375.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Z. PENAVA, N. PRAVDIĆ, to be published.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From C. M. KINNON, (Ed.)The Impact of Modern Scientific Ideas on Society Reidel/UNESCO, 1981, p. 29.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pravdić, N., Aganović-Boras, A. & Kritovac, D. In search of a “Non-citation index” indicator for scientific activity assessment in less developed countries. Case study of Croatia/Yugoslavia. Scientometrics 14, 111–125 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020246

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020246

Keywords

Navigation