Abstract
A sample of “Citation Classics” in three scientific fields was studied to uncover citing motivations. The classics were classified into basic research, methods and reviews. Number of citations received per classic, number of authors, and age of classic per category and scientific field were the parameters studied. Journals and countries accounting for the highest incidence of classics were examined. A striking parallelism was found in the parameters applied to the categories in the scientific fields studied. This parallelism suggests similar citing habits of scientists in the fields studied which should be reflected in the structures of science obtained through citation grounded bibliometric models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. M. COLLINS, Tacit knowledge and scientific networks, in:Readings in the Sociology of Knowledge, B. BARNES, D. EDGE (Eds), Cambridge, MIT Press, 1983, p. 44–64.
D. EDGE, Quantitative measures of communication in sciences: A critical review,History of Science, 17 (1979) 102–134.
B. CRONIN,The Citation Process, Oxford, Taylor Graham 1984.
L. LEYDESDORFF, Towards a theory of citation?Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 305–309.
H. SMALL, E. SWEENEY, Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. I. A. comparison of methods,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 381–409; H. SMALL, E. SWEENEY, II. Mapping science,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 321–340.
J. IRVINE, et al., Charting the decline in British science,Nature, 316 (15 August 1985) 587–90.
T. BRAUN, E. BUJDOSÓ, A. SCHUBERT,Literature of Analytical Chemistry: A Scientometric Evaluation, CRC Press, 1987.
P. HEALEY, H. ROTHMAN, P. K. HOCH, An experiment in science mapping for research planning,Research Policy, 15 (1986) 233–251.
A. MENDEZ, C. BLANCO, Differences between requested and cited literature in a group of dairy research scientists,Journal of Information Science, 1 (1979) 113–116.
P. VINKLER, A quasi-quantitative citations model,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 47–72.
M. J. MORAVCSIK, P. MURUGESAN, Some results on the function and quality of citations,Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 86–92.
D. E. CHUBIN, S. D. MOITRA, Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?Social Studies of Science 5 (1975) 423–441.
B. FINNEY,The Reference Characteristics of Scientific Texts, London City University, Centre for information Science (MSc Dissertation), 1974.
B. C. PERITZ, Are methodological papers more cited than theoretical or empirical ones? The case of sociology,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 211–218.
E. GARFIELD, The 1000 articles most cited in 1961–1982. Another 100 Citation Classics cap the millenary,Current Contents, 16 (1986) 3–11.
Center for Research Planning.Final Report on Construction of Database to Support Formulation of Science Policy for Spanish Director General of Science Policy. Philadelphia, CRP. (Confidential Report), 1986.
E. GARFIELD, Citation classics. Four year of the human side of science,Current Contents, 22 (1981) 5–15.
E. GARFIELD, Contemporary classics in the life sciences: An autobiographical feast,Current Contents, 44 (1985) 3–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Méndez, A., Gómez, I. A comparison of citation classics in three fields of science. Scientometrics 15, 621–631 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017074
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017074