Skip to main content
Log in

Differences betweenDrosophila melanogaster and its sibling speciesD. simulans in sensitivity to acridine orange treatment

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Larvae and adults ofD. melanogaster andD. simulans were fed with acridine orange, in order to test sensitivity differences between the species. Our results show that, of the two species,D. simulans is more resistant in the larval stages, andD. melanogaster is more resistant in the adult stage. Furthermore, adult males of both species are more sensitive than adult females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lerman, L. S., J. molec. Biol.3 (1961) 18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barker, G. R., and Hardman, N., Biochem. Soc. Trans.2 (1974) 330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lasnitzky, I., and Wilkinson, J. H., Br. J. Cancer11 (1948) 369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Orgel, A., and Brenner, S., J. molec. Biol.3 (1961) 762.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zampieri, A., and Greenberg, J., Mutation Res2 (1965) 552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray, T. C., Bact. Proc. (1971) 65.

  7. Davies, P. J., Evans, W. E., and Parky, J. M., Mutation Res.29 (1975) 301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, A. M., Am. Nat.87 (1953) 295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murakami, A., Mutation Res.22 (1974) 295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nuti-Ronchi, V., and D'Amato, F., Caryologia14 (1961) 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Popescu, N. C., Turnbull, D., and Dipaolo, J. A., J. natl Cancer Inst.59 (1977) 289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Duuren, B. L., Sivak, A., Katz, C., and Melchionne, S., Br. J. Cancer23 (1969) 587.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcos, R., López de Sepúlveda, J., Xamena, N., and Creus, A., Experientia37 (1981) 559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcos, R., Lloberas, J., Creus, A., Xamena, N., and Cabré, O., Toxic. Lett.13 (1982) 105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vogel, E. and Lüers, H., Drosophila Inf. Serv.51 (1974) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abbott, W. S., J. econ. Ent.18 (1925) 265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nigsch, J., Graf, U., and Würgler, F. E., Mutation Res.43 (1977) 57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogel, E., and Natarajan, A. T., Mutation Res.62 (1979) 51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmering, S., Kofkoff, R., and Osgood, C., Mutation Res.43 (1977) 453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Graf, U., and Würgler, F. E., Mutation Res.34 (1976) 251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parsons, P. A., A. Rev. Genet.7 (1974) 239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work supported in part by grant No. 0311/81 from the CAICYT.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alba, P., Ferrés, M.D., Xamena, N. et al. Differences betweenDrosophila melanogaster and its sibling speciesD. simulans in sensitivity to acridine orange treatment. Experientia 39, 300–301 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955315

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955315

Keywords

Navigation