Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional potential ofVigna minima (Roxb.) Ohwi and Ohashi:

I. Seed protein content and amino acid composition

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seed protein content and amino acid composition of 14 natural populations and their three-generation progenies (grown in different locations) belonging toVigna minima (Roxb.) Ohwi & Ohashi and ofV. umbellata cv IC 1568 have been investigated. The populations ofV. minima were sampled from different ecozones of Western Ghats of Kerala and Tamil Nadu (India). The range of variation in protein levels is narrow, but the protein content of the coastal population is higher than the rice bean suggesting its breeding potential for high protein and salt tolerant lines of rice bean. Although the seed protein content shows genotype × environment interaction, there is a substantial genetic variability among the populations. The tenuous relationship between protein content and yield conponents suggest the presence of correlation breakers which can be utilized in breeding programmes of rice bean. There is a broad genetic base in the levels of essential amino acids, and the range of variation observed is higher than that recorded for different species ofVigna andPhaseolus. The wild relative is nutritionally as good as or superior to the cultigen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrol YP, Chatterjee SR (1980) Nutritional quality of grain legumes. Plant Biochem J. Sircar Memorial Volume: 125–149

  2. Amirshahi MC, Tavakoli M (1970) Protein content of different varieties of five species of pulse crops. In: Improving Plant Protein by Nuclear Technique STI/PUB/258 IAEA, Vienna, pp 331–335

  3. Baldi G, Salamini F (1973) Variability of essential amino acid content in seeds of 22Phaseolus species. Theor Appl Genet 43:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bliss FA (1973) Cowpeas in Nigeria. In: Milner M (ed) Nutritional Improvement of Food Legumes by Breeding. Proc Symp PAG/FAO, New York, pp 107–116

  5. Blixt B (1979) Natural and induced variability for seed protein in temperate legumes. In: Seed Protein Improvement in Cereals and Grain legumes, Vol. II. Proc Symp Neuherberg STI/PUB/496 IAEA, Vienna, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterjee SR, Abrol YP (1975) Amino acid composition of new varieties of cereals and pulses: nutritional potential of cereal-pulse combinations. J Fd Sci & Tech 12:121–127

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chatterjee SR, Verma NS, Gulati SC, Bakshi JS, Abrol YP (1975) Identification of barley strains with improved amino acid balance. Euphytica 24:725–730

    Google Scholar 

  8. Comstock RE, Molle RM (1963) Genotype — environmental interactions. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NAG-NRC Publication, pp 164–196

  9. Crocomo OJ, Neto AT, Ando A, Blixt S, Boulter, D (1977) Breeding for improved protein content and quality in the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). In: Seed Protein Improvement by Nuclear Techniques, Proc Two Res Co-ord Meetings Baden STI/PUB/479 IAEA, Vienna, pp 207–220

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evans AM (1973) Genetic improvement ofPhaseolus vulgaris. In: Milner M (ed) Nutritional Improvement of Food Legumes by Breeding. Proc Symp PAG/FAO New York, pp 107–116

  11. FAO (1973) In: Energy and protein requirements. Report of Joint FAO/WHO Ad-hoc expert Committee, FAO/WHO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  12. Furedi J (1970) Possibilities of hybridisation to increase protein yield of pea. Hung Acad Sci Agric Dep proc 29:377–388

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horwitz W (1965) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 10th edn, AOAC Washington DC, pp 744–760

    Google Scholar 

  14. IAEA (1977) Seed Protein Improvement by Nuclear Techniques. Proc Two Res Co-ord Meetings. Badan STI/PUB/479 IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  15. IAEA (1979) Seed Protein Improvement in Cereals and Grain Legumes, Vol I and Vol II. Proc Symp Neuherberg STI/PUB/496 IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ingversen K, Koie B, Doll H (1973) Induced seed protein mutant of barley. Experientia 29: 1151–1152

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson GR, Frey KJ (1967) Heritabilities of quantitative attributes of oats (Avena sp) at varying levels of environmental stress. Crop Sci 7:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock LE (1955) Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybeans and their implications in selections.Agron J 47:477–483

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kachroo, P. (1970) Pulse Crops of India, ICAR, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krober OA, Jacob MK, Lal RK, Kashkary VK (1970) Effects of variety and location on the protein content of pulses. Indian J Agric Sci 40:1025–1030

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leleji OI, Dickson MH, Crowder LV, Bourke JB (1972) Inheritance of crude protein percentage and its correlation with seed yield in beanPhaseolus vulgaris L. Crop Sci 12:168–171

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luse RA, Rachie KO (1970) Seed Protein improvement in tropical food legumes. In: Seed Protein Improvement in Cereals and Grain Legumes, Vol II. Proc Symp Neuherberg STI/PUB/479 IAEA, Vienna, pp 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma Ya, Nelson OE (1975) Amino acid composition and storage proteins on two new high-lysine mutants of maize. Cereal Chem 52:912–919

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ma Yu, Bliss FA (1978) Seed proteins of common bean. Crop Sci 18:431–437

    Google Scholar 

  25. Millerd A (1975) Biochemistry of legume seed proteins. Ann Rev Pl Physiol 26:53–72

    Google Scholar 

  26. Milner M (1973) Nutritional Improvement of Food Legumes by Breeding. Proc Symp PAG/FAO New York, pp 107–116

  27. Moore S, Stein WH (1963) Chromatographic determination of amino acids by the use of automatic recording equipment. Methods in Enzymol 6:819–831

    Google Scholar 

  28. Munck L, Karlsson KE, Hageberg A, Eggum BO (1970) Gene for improved nutritive value in barley seed proteins. Science 168:985–987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson OE, Mertz ET, Bates L (1965) Second mutant gene affecting the amino acid pattern of maize endosperm proteins. Science 150:1469–1470

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reddy LJ, Green JM, Singh V, Bissen SS, Jambunathan R (1979) Seed protein studies onCajanus cajan, Atylosia spp and some hybrid derivatives. In: Seed Protein Improvement in Cereals and Grain Legumes, Vol II. Proc Symp Neuherberg STI/PUB/496, IAEA Vienna, pp 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roys WV (1973) Amino acid profiles ofCajanus cajan protein. In: Milner M (ed) Nutritional Improvement of Food Legumes by Breeding. Proc Symp PAG/FAO New York, pp 193–196

  32. Rutger JN (1970) Variation in protein content and its relation to other characters in beansPhaseolus vulgaris L. Report 10th Dry Bean Res Conf. Davis, California

  33. Singh R, Axtell JD (1973) High lysine mutant gene (hi) that improves protein quality and biological value of grainSorghum. Crop Sci 13:535–539

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Pun Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 1–641

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tandon OB, Bressani R, Scrimshaw NS, Lebe AU (1957) Nutritive value of beans, nutrients in central American beans. J Agric Food Chem 5:137–142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gopinathan, M.C., Babu, C.R., Chatterjee, S.R. et al. Nutritional potential ofVigna minima (Roxb.) Ohwi and Ohashi:. Plant Food Hum Nutr 36, 345–355 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01892356

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01892356

Key words

Navigation