Skip to main content
Log in

Kausalität ohne Vorhersagbarkeit — Eine These des Empirismus im Konflikt mit der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Empiricists mostly prefer an epistemic notion of causality intending thereby to avoid metaphysical entanglements. General relativity however provides examples for causality without predictability, i. e. world models in which for geometrical reasons there exist no spacelike hypersurfaces containing traces of all future events. Yet local determinism for every single event remains valid in these cases. Therefore the problem arises how to account for a causal structure that implies local but not global predictability. This problem, it is argued, cannot be solved by characterizing the causal connection of events itself by means of its epistemic aspects. Instead the ontological ground must be emphazised which allows for varying epistemic properties of causal connections according to the space-time structure. This can be done by use of the energy transfer concept of causality which involves no reminiscence of dubious natural necessity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. E. Nagel, The Causal Character of Modern Physical Theory, „Freedom and Reason“, Glencoe 1951, H. Margenau, B. van Fraassen, Causality in: R. Klibansky (Ed.) Contemporary Philosophy II, Florenz 1968.

  2. R. Carnap, Foundations of Physics, New York 1966.

  3. R. Geroch, Prediction in General Relativity, in Earman/Glymour/Stachel (Eds): Foundations of Space-Time-Theories, Minneapolis 1977, S. 85/86.

  4. Vgl. Robert Geroch, Prediction in General Relativity (1977) in: Earman, Glymour & Stachel (Eds.), Foundations of Space-Time-Theories, Minneapolis 1977, S. 81–93, hier S. 92.

  5. Vgl. R. Geroch, Domain of Dependence, Journal of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 11, (1970), S. 437–449, hier: S. 440.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Feigl, Notes on Causality, in: Feigl/Brodbeck, „Readings in the Philosophy of Science“, New York 1953.

  7. H. Mehlberg, The Problem of Causality in an Indeterministic Science, Int. Jour. Theor. Phys., Vol. 2 (1969), S. 351–372.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brian Skryms, Causal Necessity, Yale University Press New Haven 1980, S. 111.

  9. B. Russell, On the Notion of Cause, with Applications to the Free-Will Problem, Proc. Arist. Soc., XIII, 1912/13, S. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Schlick, Kausalität im täglichen Leben und in der neueren Naturwissenschaft, englisch 1932, deutsch: L. Krüger (Ed.): Erkenntnisprobleme der Naturwissenschaft, Köln 1970 S. 135–155.

  11. H. Feigl, Notes on Causality (1953).

  12. G. E. M. Anscombe, Causality and Determination, Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge 1971.

  13. Feigl, Notes on Causality (1953).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Vortrag, gehalten an der Universität Bielefeld, Juli 1984

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartels, A. Kausalität ohne Vorhersagbarkeit — Eine These des Empirismus im Konflikt mit der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 18, 50–60 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801077

Navigation