Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation of histochemically visualized mercury and silver

  • Papers
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Accumulations of silver and mercury can be visualized in tissue sections by a technique called autometallography or physical development. In order to make a histological differentiation between mercury and silver in tissue exposed to both metals, it is necessary to remove one of the metals while leaving the other untouched. The present paper describes a technique by which silver accumulations in histological sections can be removed by potassium cyanide, yet leaving mercury accumulations intact to be developed autometallographically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASETH, J., OLSEN, A., HALSE, J. & HOVIG, T. (1981) Argyria-tissue deposition of silver as selenide.Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 41 247–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANSCHER, G. (1981a) Histochemical demonstration of heavy metals. A revised version of the sulphide silver method suitable for both light and electron microscopy.Histochemistry 71 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANSCHER, G. (1981b) Light and electron microscopic localization of silver in biological tissue.Histochemistry 71 177–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANSCHER, G. (1982) Exogenous selenium in the brain. A histochemical technique for light and electron microscopical localization of catalytic selenium bonds.Histochemistry 76 281–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANSCHER, G. (1984) Autometallography.Histochemistry 81 331–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANSCHER, G., HOWELL, G., PEREZ-CLAUSELL, J. & HERTEL, N. (1985) The dithizone, Timm's sulphide silver and the selenium methods demonstrate a chelatable pool of zinc in CNS.Histochemistry 83 419–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANSCHER, G. & MØLLER-MADSEN, B. (1985) Silver amplification of mercury sulfide and selenide.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33 219–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANSCHER, G. & ZIMMER, J. (1978) An improved Timm sulphide silver method for light and electron microscopic localization of heavy metals in biological tissues.Histochemistry 55 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMPSEY, E. W. (1973) Neural and vascular ultrastructure of the area postrema of the rat.J. comp. Neurol. 150 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMES, T. H. (1939) The reduction of silver ions by hydroquinone.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 61 648–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMES, T. H. (1977)The Theory of the Photographic Process. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIESEGANG, R. (1928) Histologische Versilberung.Z. wiss. Mikrosk. 45 273–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUNGBY, J., DANSCHER, G., MØLLER-MADSEN, B., RESKENIELSEN, E. & HANSEN, J. C. (1983) Localization of silver and mercury in human brain tissue.Neurosci. Letts., suppl. 14, 318.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIRABE, T. (1979) Identification of mercury in the brain of Minamata disease victims by electron microscopic X-ray microanalysis.Neurotoxicology 1 349.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIMM, F. (1958) Zur Histochemie der Schwermetalle. Das Sulfid-Silber-Verfahren.Dtsch. Z. Gesamte Gerichtl. Med. 46 706–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIMM, F. (1962) Der histochemische Nachweis der Sublimatvergiftung.Beitr. Gerichtl. Med. 21 195–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danscher, G., Rungby, J. Differentiation of histochemically visualized mercury and silver. Histochem J 18, 109–114 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675364

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675364

Keywords

Navigation