Skip to main content
Log in

Die antibaktierielle Wirksamkeit von Cefaclor bei Ampicillin-, Tetracyclin- und Co-Trimoxazol-resistenten Keimen

The antibacterial efficacy of cefaclor against bacteria resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline and co-trimoxazole

  • Mikrobiologische Beurteilung Von Cefaclor
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die antibakterielle Aktivität des neuen Oralcephalosporins Cefaclor wurde an 623 frischen Isolaten untersucht. Gute Wirksamkeit konnte beiEscherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis undKlebsiella festgestellt werden. Nahezu alle Stämme, die Ampicillin-, Tetracyclin- und Co-Trimoxazol-empfindlich waren, konnten auch mit Cefaclor gehemmt werden. Die gegen diese drei Präparate resistenten Isolate waren zum Teil noch Cefaclor-empfindlich: alle von zehn Co-Trimoxazol-resistentenP. mirabilis-Stämmen, 54% der Ampicillin-, Tetracyclin- und Co-Trimoxazol-resistentenE. coli-Isolate und 18% der Tetracyclin-und Co-Trimoxazol-resistenten Klebsiellen.

Summary

The antibacterial activity of the new oral cephalosporin cefaclor was investigated using 623 freshly isolated bacterial strains. A high degree of efficacy of cefaclor was noticed againstEscherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis andKlebsiella. Nearly all strains which were sensitive to ampicillin, tetracycline and co-trimoxazole were also inhibited by cefaclor. Some of the strains resistant to the three above-mentioned antibiotics were also sensitive to cefaclor as follows: all of tenP. mirabilis strains resistant to co-trimoxazole, 54% of theE. coli strains resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline and co-trimoxazole, and 18% of theKlebsiella strains resistant to tetracycline and co-trimoxazole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Korzeniowski, O. M., Scheld, W. M., Sande, M. A. Comparative pharmacology of cefaclor and cephalexin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12 (1977) 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyers, B. R., Hirschman, S. Z., Wormser, G., Gartenberg, G., Srulevitch, E. Pharmacologic studies with cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 18 (1978) 174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bill, N. J., Washington II, J. A. Comparison of in vitro activity of cephalexin, cephradine, and cefaclor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 11 (1977) 470–474.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meyers, B. R., Hirschman, S. Z. Antimicrobial activity in vitro of cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 18 (1978) 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fass, R. J., Prior, R. B. Comparative in vitro activities of oral cephalosporins and competitive antibiotics against recent clinical isolates. Curr. Ther. Res. 24 (1978) 352–365.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shadomy, S., Carver, M. Diffusion disc susceptibility testing with cefaclor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Silver, M. S., Counts, G. W., Zeleznik, D., Turck, M. Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: Cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12 (1977) 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrar, W. E., O'Dell, N. M. Comparative β-lactamase resistance and antistaphylococcal activities of parenterally and orally administered cephalosporins. J. Infect. Dis. 137 (1978) 490–493.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neu, H. C., Fu, K. P. Cefaclor: In vitro spectrum of activity and beta-lactamase stability. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 584–588.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gray, B. M., Hubbell, C. A., Dillon, H. C. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to cefaclor and cephalothin: Laboratory and clinical studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 988–991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Herrn Professor Dr.G. Maurer zum 70. Geburtstag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Machka, K. Die antibaktierielle Wirksamkeit von Cefaclor bei Ampicillin-, Tetracyclin- und Co-Trimoxazol-resistenten Keimen. Infection 7 (Suppl 6), S536–S539 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01659729

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01659729

Navigation