Zusammenfassung
Die antibakterielle Aktivität des neuen Oralcephalosporins Cefaclor wurde an 623 frischen Isolaten untersucht. Gute Wirksamkeit konnte beiEscherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis undKlebsiella festgestellt werden. Nahezu alle Stämme, die Ampicillin-, Tetracyclin- und Co-Trimoxazol-empfindlich waren, konnten auch mit Cefaclor gehemmt werden. Die gegen diese drei Präparate resistenten Isolate waren zum Teil noch Cefaclor-empfindlich: alle von zehn Co-Trimoxazol-resistentenP. mirabilis-Stämmen, 54% der Ampicillin-, Tetracyclin- und Co-Trimoxazol-resistentenE. coli-Isolate und 18% der Tetracyclin-und Co-Trimoxazol-resistenten Klebsiellen.
Summary
The antibacterial activity of the new oral cephalosporin cefaclor was investigated using 623 freshly isolated bacterial strains. A high degree of efficacy of cefaclor was noticed againstEscherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis andKlebsiella. Nearly all strains which were sensitive to ampicillin, tetracycline and co-trimoxazole were also inhibited by cefaclor. Some of the strains resistant to the three above-mentioned antibiotics were also sensitive to cefaclor as follows: all of tenP. mirabilis strains resistant to co-trimoxazole, 54% of theE. coli strains resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline and co-trimoxazole, and 18% of theKlebsiella strains resistant to tetracycline and co-trimoxazole.
Literatur
Korzeniowski, O. M., Scheld, W. M., Sande, M. A. Comparative pharmacology of cefaclor and cephalexin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12 (1977) 157–162.
Meyers, B. R., Hirschman, S. Z., Wormser, G., Gartenberg, G., Srulevitch, E. Pharmacologic studies with cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 18 (1978) 174–179.
Bill, N. J., Washington II, J. A. Comparison of in vitro activity of cephalexin, cephradine, and cefaclor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 11 (1977) 470–474.
Meyers, B. R., Hirschman, S. Z. Antimicrobial activity in vitro of cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 18 (1978) 85–90.
Fass, R. J., Prior, R. B. Comparative in vitro activities of oral cephalosporins and competitive antibiotics against recent clinical isolates. Curr. Ther. Res. 24 (1978) 352–365.
Shadomy, S., Carver, M. Diffusion disc susceptibility testing with cefaclor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 228–233.
Silver, M. S., Counts, G. W., Zeleznik, D., Turck, M. Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: Cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 12 (1977) 591–596.
Farrar, W. E., O'Dell, N. M. Comparative β-lactamase resistance and antistaphylococcal activities of parenterally and orally administered cephalosporins. J. Infect. Dis. 137 (1978) 490–493.
Neu, H. C., Fu, K. P. Cefaclor: In vitro spectrum of activity and beta-lactamase stability. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 584–588.
Gray, B. M., Hubbell, C. A., Dillon, H. C. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to cefaclor and cephalothin: Laboratory and clinical studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 988–991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Herrn Professor Dr.G. Maurer zum 70. Geburtstag.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Machka, K. Die antibaktierielle Wirksamkeit von Cefaclor bei Ampicillin-, Tetracyclin- und Co-Trimoxazol-resistenten Keimen. Infection 7 (Suppl 6), S536–S539 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01659729
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01659729