Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An alternative method of validating blood pressure measurement: The sphygmooscillographic method

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, et al. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1993;21:504–509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. AAMI: American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. Arlington, Virginia: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 1987

  3. O'Brien E, O'Malley K, Sheridan J. The need for a standardized protocol for validating noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertension 1989;7:S19-S20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sapinski A. Comparison of the sphygmooscillographic method with the direct and auscultatory method of measuring blood pressure. J Clin Monit 1994;10:373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hetmanska St. 15/19D m.7, 60-254, Poznan, Poland

    Andrzej Sapinski MD

Authors
  1. Andrzej Sapinski MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sapinski, A. An alternative method of validating blood pressure measurement: The sphygmooscillographic method. J Clin Monitor Comput 11, 348–349 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01616996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01616996

Keywords

Search

Navigation