Skip to main content
Log in

Aedes albopictus cells resistant to adenosine because of a defect in nucleoside transport

  • Published:
Somatic Cell Genetics

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

By growing Aedes albopictusmosquito cells in media containing increasing concentrations of adenosine and subsequently plating low numbers of cells in the presence of EHNA (an inhibitor of adenosine deaminase), three clones were obtained which were resistant to adenosine. The adenosine-resistant clones contained levels of adenosine and thymidine kinase similar to those in the parental cells, but were unable to incorporate labeled nucleosides (adenosine, uridine, thymidine, or guanosine) into TCA-precipitable material. The inability to incorporate nucleosides was also reflected in an enhanced resistance to several nucleoside analogs such as 5-fluorodeoxyuridine and tubercidin but not to the unribosylated base, 5-fluorouracil. Direct measurements over short time intervals indicated that the primary defect in these cells was at the level of nucleoside transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Henderson, J.F. (1977).Horizons Biochem. Biophys. 4:130–158.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Willis, R.C., Carson, D.A., and Seegmiller, J.E. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:3042–3044.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Streeter, D.G., Witkowski, J.T., Khare, G.P., Sidwell, R.W., Bauer, R.J., Robins, R.K., and Simon, L.N. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:1174–1178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowe, J.K., Brox, L., and Henderson, J.F. (1977).Cancer Res. 37:736–743.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malinoski, F., and Stollar, V. (1981).Virology 110:281–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malinoski, F., and Stollar, V. (1981).Antiviral Res. 1:287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McBurney, M.W., and Whitmore, G.F. (1975).J. Cell. Physiol. 85:87–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarver, N., and Stollar, V. (1977).Virology 80:390–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mento, S.J., and Stollar, V. (1978).Somat. Cell Genet. 4:179–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eagle, H. (1959).Science 130:432–437.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaeffer, H., and Schwendler, C.F. (1974).J. Med. Chem. 17:6–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillies, S., and Stollar, V. (1981).J. Biol. Chem. 256:13,188–13,192.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkins, R., and Berlin, R.D. (1969). BBA173:324–337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, I.H., and Kelley, W.N. (1978).Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47:655–686.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bertino, J.R. (1979).Cancer Res. 39:293–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berlin, R.D., and Oliver, J.M. (1975).Int. Rev. Cytol. 42:287–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Plagemann, P.G.W., and Wohlheuter, R.W. (1980).Curr. Top. Membr. Transp. 14:225–330.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hershfield, M.S., Snyder, F.F., and Seegmiller, J.E. (1977).Science 197:1284–1287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hashmi, S., May, S.R., Krooth, R.S., and Miller, O.J. (1975).J. Cell. Physiol. 86:191–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishii, K., and Green, H. (1973).J. Cell Sci. 13:429–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skoda, J. (1963).Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. 2:197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen, A., Ullman, B., and Martin, D. (1979).J. Biol. Chem. 254:112–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanners, C.P., Eliceiri, G.L., and Green, H. (1971).Nature (London), New Biol. 230:52–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherwood, A., Stollar, V. Aedes albopictus cells resistant to adenosine because of a defect in nucleoside transport. Somat Cell Mol Genet 8, 575–585 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542852

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542852

Keywords

Navigation