Abstract
Antimony and glass pH electrodes show almost identical experimental errors in continuously measuring buffer solutions at constant temperature over 24 hr. These errors are lower than the nominal quantization error of the instruments and are not properly described by the 24- hr drift determination. The addition of food particles to the solutions can induce severe reading artifacts. The longer response time reported in vitroof antimony electrodes when moving from pH 1 to pH 7 (3.4 sec vs 0.8 sec with glass electrodes) is irrelevant during in vivopH-metry studies, because we found that the greatest absolute difference between raw fast acquired (4–6 sec) consecutive pH readings of two commonly used devices was 0.7 pH units in circadian profiles obtained from 413 subjects with various clinical conditions. In our in vivo studies, gastric acidity was monitored continuously with two side-by-side minielectrodes, which were variously combined (antimony-glass, A-G; antimony-antimony A1–A2; glass-glass, G1–G2) and applied on groups of 27 subjects matched for clinical condition. The 24-hr pH means and the 24-hr [H+] means calculated from the acidity profiles obtained with the three electrode combinations, lie on the identity line in each group. Using the Bland-Altman technique for assessing measurement agreement, the differences between the 24- hr pH means and the 24-hr [H+] means obtained with the three combined systems are similar (P=.903 and P=0.824, respectively) and their 95% confidence limits are comprised within the range (±) of the reading error of the measuring systems (namely, ±0.3 pH units and ±12 mmolliter in terms of [H+]). These data show that the 24-hr acidity indexes calculated from gastric pH recordings performed with two closely adjacent antimony and glass electrodes are similar, irrespective of their possible combinations. It can be concluded that antimony and glass electrodes provide equivalent results in vivo and can be used interchangeably in the clinical setting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fimmel CJ, Etienne A, Cilluffo T, von Ritter C, Gasser T, Rey JP, Caradonna-Moscatelli P, Sabbatini F, Pace F, Buehler HW, Bauerfeind P, Blum AL: Long-term ambulatory gastric pH monitoring: validation of a new method and effect of H2-receptor antagonists. Gastroenterology 88:1842–1851, 1985
Emde C, Garner A, Blum AL: Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: Current status and recommendations. Gut 28:1177–1188, 1987
Bauerfeind P, Cilluffo T, Fimmel CJ, Emde C, von Ritter C, Kohler W, Gugler R, Gasser T, Blum AL: Does smoking interfere with the effect of histamine H2-receptor antagonists on intragastric acidity in man? Gut 28:549–556, 1987
Merki H, Witzel L, Harre K, Scheurle E, Neuman J, Roehmel J: Single dose treatment with H2 receptor antagonists: Is bedtime administration too late? Gut 28:451–454, 1987
Savarino V, Scalabrini P, Mela GS, Di Timoteo E, Percario G, Magnolia MR, Celle G: Evaluation of antisecretory activity of misoprostol in duodenal ulcer patients using long-term intragastric pH monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 33:293–297, 1988
Savarino V, Mela GS, Scalabrini P, Sumberaz A, Fera G, Zentilin P, Celle G: Overnight comparable anacidity by standard large and half single bedtime doses of H2-antagonists in duodenal ulcer patients: A clinical pharmacological study. Am J Gastroenterol 83:917–922, 1988
Bumm R, Blum AL: Lessons from prolonged gastric pH monitoring. Alim Pharmacol Ther 1(suppl 1):518S-527S, 1987
Merki HS, Fimmel CJ, Walt RP, Harre K, Röhmel J, Witzel L: Pattern of 24 hour intragastric acidity in active duodenal ulcer disease and in healthy controls. Gut 29:1583–1587, 1988
Savarino V, Mela GS, Scalabrini P, Sumberaz A, Fera G, Celle G: 24-hour study of intragastric acidity in duodenal ulcer patients and normal subjects using continuous intraluminal pH-metry. Dig Dis Sci 33:1077–1080, 1988
McLauchlan G, Rawlings JM, Lucas ML, McCloy RF, Crean GP, McColl KEL: Electrodes for 24 hour pH monitoring—a comparative study. Gut 28:935–939, 1987
Andersen J, Naesdam J, Stroem M: Identical 24-hour gastric pH profiles when using intragastric antimony and glass electrodes or aspirated gastric juice. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:375–379, 1988
Savarino V, Mela GS, Zentilin P, Magnolia MR, Scalabrini P, Valle F, Moretti M, Bonifacino G, Celle G: Gastric aspiration versus antimony and glass pH electrodes: a simultaneous comparativein vivo study. Scand J Gastroenterol 24:434–439, 1989
Mela GS, Savarino V, Moretti M, Bonifacino G, Sumberaz A, Zentilin P: Clinical rilevance of sampling rate in the characterization and analysis of 24 hour gastric acidity. A report on 413 cases. Scand J Gastroenterol 24:683–687, 1989
Moore EW: Determination of pH by the glass electrode: pH meter calibration for gastric analysis. Gastroenterology 54:501–507, 1968
Bendat JS, Piersol AG: Measurement and Analysis of Random Data. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1966
Ask P, Edwall G, Johansson KE: Accuracy and choice of procedures in 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring with monocrystalline antimony electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput 24:602–608, 1986
Savarino V, Mela GS, Scalabrini P, Magnolia MR, Di Timoteo E, Percario G, Celle G: Continuous 24 hour intragastric pH monitoring: focus on reproducibility in duodenal ulcer patients. A preliminary report. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 10:826–830, 1986
Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310, 1986
Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987
Savarino V, Mela GS: Comparison of gastric aspiration and continuous pH monitoring with antimony electrode: Methodological remarks. Dig Dis 8 (suppl 1):23–30, 1990
Merki H, Witzel L, Walt R, Cohnen E, Harre K, Hein J, Mappes A, Roehmel J: Day-to-day variation of 24 hour intragastric acidity. Gastroenterology 94:887–891, 1988
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mela, G.S., Savarino, V., Moretti, M. et al. Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity. Digest Dis Sci 35, 1473–1481 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540564
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540564