Skip to main content
Log in

The abrupt religious conversion experience

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. E.g., the Apostle Paul, St. Augustine, St. Francis, Tolstoy, John Wesley, etc. See Underwood, Alfred C.,Conversion: Christian and Non-Christian (New York, Macmillan, 1925) for a comprehensive historical survey.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, Elmer T.,The Psychology of Religious Awakening. New York, Macmillan, 1929, and more recently in Allport, Gordon W.,The Individual and His Religion. New York, Macmillan, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freedman, Daniel X., “Perspectives on the Use and Abuse of Psychedelic Drugs.” In Efron, Daniel H., et al., eds.,Ethnopharmacologic Search for Psychoactive Drugs. Washington, D. C., Public Health Service Publication No. 1645, 1967, pp. 77–102; also Aberle, David F.,The Peyote Religion among the Navabo. Chicago, Aldine Publishing Co., 1966.

  4. Malcolm X.,The Autobiography of Malcolm X. New York, Grove Press, 1965; also Draper, Edgar,Psychiatry and Pastoral Care. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1965, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace, Anthony F. C., “Revitalization Movements,”American Anthropologist, 1956, 58, 264.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Psychotherapy may have this same dual potentiality. See. Bergin, Allen E., “Some Implications of Psychotherapy Research for Therapeutic Practice”,Int. J. Psychiatry 1967,3, 136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Later published in his extensive two-volume work on adolescence: Hall, Granville Stanley,Adolescence. New York, Appleton, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  8. James, William,The Varieties of Religious Experience, a study in human nature; being the Gifford lectures on natural religion delivered at Edinburgh in 1901–1902. New York, The Modern Library, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coe, George A.,The Spiritual Life, New York, Eaton & Mains, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ,The Psychology of Religion. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Starbuck, Edwin D.,The Psychology of Religion, New York, Scribner & Sons, 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leuba, James H., “A Study in the Psychology of Religious Phenomena,”Amer. J. Psychol., 1896, 7, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The issue ofgradual versussudden experiences was extensively considered by early students of conversion: Ames, Edward S.,The Psychology of Religious Experience. Boston, Houghton-Mifflin Co., 1910; Pratt, James B.,The Psychology of Religious Belief. New York, Macmillan, 1907, James,op. cit., James B.,The Psychology of Religious Belief. New York, Macmillan, 1907 and Starbuckop. cit. Starbuck, Edwin D.,The Psychology of Religion, New York, Scribner & Sons, 1899 Conversion as used in this paper will refer only to abrupt conversions, where a sense of crisis and subsequent resolution is experienced within a matter of hours or days.

    Google Scholar 

  14. James,op. cit.; Starbuck,op. cit. Starbuck, Edwin D.,The Psychology of Religion. New York, Scribner & Sons, 1899. and Leuba,op. cit.Leuba, Mames H., “A Study in the Psychology of Religious Phenomena,”Amer. J. Psychol., 1896, 7, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The conversion experience, being practically as ancient as recorded history (see Underwood,op. cit.), had been extensively described in the literature of history and theology. This was, however, a kind of first performance for the newly-established science of psychology, where the wish was to be as empirical as possible.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Starbuch,op. cit., p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coe,The Spiritual Life op. cit.. p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. James,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  19. Daniels, Arthur H., “The New Life: a Study of Regeneration,”Amer. J. Psychol. 1893,6, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Starbuck,op. cit., 1899

    Google Scholar 

  21. James,op. cit., 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Starbuck,op. cit., 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coe,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  24. James,op. cit.. Also of interest are the views on temperamental factors in conversion expressed by Clarence D. Royse in “The Psychology of Saul's Conversion,”Amer. J. Relig., Psychol., and Ed., 1904,1, 141.

    Google Scholar 

  25. James,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  26. Coe,The Spiritual Life, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  27. Starbuck,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pratt,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  29. James,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ames,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  31. Although forced by the religion-science polemic of the day to take a stand on this issue, early authors were well aware of the attendant complexity. “The ultimate test, doubtless, will be, does it [i.e. conversion] contribute, in the long run, in the individual and in groups of individuals to permanent growth? The settlement of such a question far exceeds the maturity of the psychology of religion.”op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pfister, Oskar, “The Entwicklung des Apostels Paulus,”Imago 1920,4, 243.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jung, Carl G., “The Psychological Foundations of Belief in Spirits.” InThe Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche. New York, Pantheon Books, Bollingen Series, XX, 1960, pp. 301–318.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jung was familiar with the positive psychotherapeutic nature of conversion in many individuals, and it is interesting to note how his comments about conversion in alcoholics were influential with one of the later founders of Alcoholics Anonymous.Alcoholics Anonymous; Cornwall, N. Y., The Cornwall Press, Inc., 1965, p. 27.

  35. Freud, Sigmund, “A Religious Experience” (1927).Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXI. London, Hogarth Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Conversion referred only to those situations in which there was a relatively consistent subsequent living-out of a changed religious perspective, not where such a change was abortive or absent. De Sanctis, Sante,Religious Conversion. New York, Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jung, “A Review of Complex Theory,” InThe Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, op. cit. pp,. 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Freud, “The Unconscious” (1915).Standard Edition, Vol. XIV, 1964.

  39. Sullivan, Harry S., “Schizophrenia: Its Conservative and Malignant Features” (1924). In Sullivan,Schizophrenia As a Human Process. New York, W. W. Norton, 1962, pp. 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Boisen, Anton J., “Personality Changes and Upheavals Arising Out of the Sense of Personal Failure,”,Amer. J. Psychiatry, 1926,82, 531.

    Google Scholar 

  41. ,Out of the Depths, New York, Harper & Bros, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  42. ,The Exploration of the Inner World. New York, Harper & Bros, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  45. Carrier, Hervé,The Sociology of Religious Belonging. New York, Herder & Herder, 1965, Jones, W. Lawson,A Psychological Study of Religious Conversion. London, Epworth Press, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Weininger, Benjamin, “The Interpersonal Factor in the Religious Experience,”Psychoanalysis, 1955,3, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Boisen, “Economic Distress and Religious Experience—a Study of the Holy Rollers,”Psychiatry 1939,2, 185. Carrier (op. cit.) Carrier, Hervé,The Sociology of Religious Belonging. New York, Herder & Herder, 1965 interprets the Pentacostal conversion of Puerto Rican immigrants to New York City as a protest against social exclusion.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Clark, Walter H.,The Psychology of Religion. New York, Macmillan, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jones,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  50. Salzman, Leon, “The Psychology of Religious and Ideological Conversion,”Psychiatry, 1953,16, 177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Maloney, James C., “Mother, God and Super-ego,”J. Amer. Psy. Assn., 1954,2, 120.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Salzman,op. cit..

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Isaacs, Kenneth, et al., “Faith, Trust, and Gulliblity,”,Int. J. Psa., 1963,44, 461. Mann, Jas., reporter, “Clinical and Theoretical Aspects of Religious Belief,”J. Amer. Psa. Assn., 1964,12, 160.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Plath, Sylvia, “In Plaster”Tri-Quarterly, 1966, 7, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mann,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  56. Leavy Stanley A., “A Religious Conversion in a Four-Year-Old Girl,”Bull. Phila. Assn. Psa., 1957, 7, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kliegerman, Charles, “A Psychoanalytic Study of the Confessions of Saint Augustine,”J. Amer. Psa. Assn., 1957,5, 469.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Maloney,op. cit.. Mann,op. cit. Mann, Jas., reporter, “Clinical and Theoretical Aspects of Religious Belief.”J. Amer. Psa. Assn., 1964,12, 160.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Southard, Samuel,Conversion and Christian Character. Nashville, Tenn., Broadman Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Salzman,op. cit..

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Christiansen, Carl W., “Religious Conversion,”A.M.A. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 1963.,9, 207.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Diagnostically, two were schizophrenic, one schizoid, and the remaining nineteen variously neurotic.

  63. Federn, Paul.Ego Psychology and the Psychoses. New York, Basic Books, 1961. Weiss Eduardo,Principles of Psychodynamics. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Christiansen (op. cit.). feels that this repeated a childhood situation of consciously, offering total submission to a parent.

    Google Scholar 

  65. op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  66. Carlson, Helen B., “Characteristics of an Acute Confusional State in College Students,”Amer. J. Psychiatry, 1958,114, 900–909.

    Google Scholar 

  67. The process of “deautomization,” discussed by Arthur Deikman (“Deautomization and the Mystic Experience,”Psychiatry, 1966,29, 324) describes the initial phase of conversion quite well.

    Google Scholar 

  68. See the autobiographic accounts in Leuba,op. cit. (note11), and Begbie, Harold,Twice-born Men. New York, Revell, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  69. See Southard's one—year follow—up study of Baptist revival convertsSouthard,op. cit. (note 57).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Christiansen,op. cit. (note 62).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cf. the maturational role of even profoundly regressive expriences in adolescence as formulated by Erik H.Erikson (“Identity and the Life Cycle,”Psychological Issues, 1959,1, 15, andYoung Man Luther. New York, W. W. Norton, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Salzman,op. cit. (note 48).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. There is surprisingly little contemporary empirical work on this problem. Reports by F. J. Roberts (“Some Psychological Factors in Religious Conversion,”Brit. J. Social and Clinical Psychol., 1965,4, 185) and Gordon Stanley (“Personality and Attitude Correlates of Religious Conversion,”J. Scientific Study of Religion, 1964,4, 60) are contradictory on the point. As pointed out above, authors have held divergent opinions on this in the past. The issue is confused by the variety of different abrupt conversion experiences, the possible differences between group and individual conversions, the specific individuals studied, and the complexities of related sociological issues (such as urbanization and the liberalization of Protestant theology. See Clarkop. cit., note 2). Clark, Elmer T.,The Psychology of Religious Awakening. New York, Macmillan, 1929

    Google Scholar 

  74. This is especially clear in the case of group conversions, which may involve whole communities (like the conversion of one-third of the students at Yale in 1802. See Clark,op. cit., quotingop. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  75. Christiansen,op. cit. (note59).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Divorce, separation, or psychosis had occurred in 18 out of 20 of these families before the patient was six years old. Carlson, Helen B., “The Relationship of the Acute Confusional State to Ego Development,”Int. J. Psa., 1961,42, 517.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  78. Erikson, Erik H.,Childhood and Society. New York, W. W. Norton, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  79. See Deikman, Arthur, “Implications of Experimentally Induced Contemplative Mediation,”J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1966,142, 101, for a demonstration of “regressive” deautomatization in normal subjects. See also Maslow, Abraham H.,Toward a Psychology of Being, New York, Van Nostrand, 1962, for a discussion of the role of “peak experiences” (clearly involving deautomatization) in the aesthetic and creative lives of normal individuals.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

H. Roberts Bagwell, M.D., resident in psychiatry at the University of Chicago from 1964 to 1967, has been serving with the Mental Health Career Development Program of the United States Public Health Service since 1963 and is now staff psychiatrist in the United States Public Health Service Hospital in San Francisco, California.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagwell, H.R. The abrupt religious conversion experience. J Relig Health 8, 163–178 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01533143

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01533143

Keywords

Navigation