Skip to main content
Log in

Social class, occupational status, occupational self-direction, and job income: A cross-national examination

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This paper evaluates the relationships of social class position, occupational status, and occupational self-direction to job income in three modern industrial societies, the United States, Japan, and Poland. In doing so, it goes beyond Wright and Perrone's analysis of 1977, which sought to establish the importance of social class by comparing the relative power with which occupational status and social class, defined in terms of relationship to the means of production, predict income. In carrying out analyses, we have also had to face the basic sociological issue of the nature and measurement of occupational status and have adopted a confirmatory factor analytic approach to the problem. Our substantive findings show that social class position has its strongest effect on income in Poland, and occupational self-direction also has an uniquely strong effect there. The singular importance of occupational status in Japan is noted and contrasted with the United States, where occupational status, social class, and education all have significant independent effects on job income.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cullen, John B. andShelly M. Novick 1979 “The Davis-Moore theory of stratification: A further examination and extension.” American Journal of Sociology 84:1424–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commings, William K. 1980 Education and Equality in Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilowicz, Pawel, andPawel Sztabinski 1977 Pytania Metryczkowe. Warsaw: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley andW. E. Moore 1945 “Some principles of stratification.” American Sociological Review 10:242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djilas, Milovan 1957 The New Class. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Otis Dudley 1961 “A socioeconomic index for all occupations” and “Properties and characteristics of the socioeconomic index.” In Albert J. Reiss (ed.), Occupations and Social Status: 109–161. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, David L., F. L. Jones, andR. M. Hauser 1975 “Assumptions of social mobility research in the U.S.: The case of occupational status.” Social Science Research 4:329–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliani, Giorgio 1981 “How many working classes?” American Journal of Sociology 87:259–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusky, David B. andRobert M. Hauser 1984 “Comparative social mobility revisited.” American Sociological Review 49:19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, August B. andFredrick C. Redlich 1958 Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imada, Takatoshi, and Sachiko Imada 1982 “Stratum differentiation, labor market structure, and career mobility.” Paper presented at the Tenth World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Mexico City.

  • Joreskog, Karl G. andDag Sorbom 1976 “Statistical models and methods for analysis of longitudinal data.” In Dennis J. Aigner and Arthur S. Goldberger (eds.), Latent Variables in Sociological Models: 285–325. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoff, Alan C. 1984 “The current state of mobility research.” Sociological Quarterly 25:139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L. 1969 Class and Conformity: A Study in Values. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L., Atsushi Naoi, Carrie Schoenbach, Carmi Schooler, andKazimierz M. Slomczynski 1990 “Position in the class structure and psychological functioning: A comparative analysis of the United States, Japan, and Poland.” American Journal of Sociology 95:964–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L., andCarrie Schoenbach 1983 “Class, stratification, and psychological functioning.” In Melvin L. Kohn and Carmi Schooler, Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification: 154–189. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L. andCarmi Schooler 1973 “Occupational experience and psychological functioning: An assessment of reciprocal effects.” American Sociological Review 38:97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L. andCarmi Schooler (with the collaboration ofJoanne Miller, Karen A. Miller, Carrie Schoenbach, andRonald Schoenberg 1983a Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L. andCarmi Schooler (with the collaboration ofJoanne Miller, Karen A. Miller, Carrie Schoenbach, andRonald Schoenberg 1983b “Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of their reciprocal effects.” In Melvin L. Kohn, Carmi Schooler, and Collaborators, Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification: 125–153. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L. andKazimierz M. Slomczynski 1990 Work, Class and Stratification: A Comparative Analysis of their Psychological Impact in Capitalist and Socialist Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike, Kazuo 1983 “Internal Labor Markets: Workers in Large Firms.” In Taishiro Shirai (ed.), Contemporary Industrial Relations in Japan: 29–62. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, George andIvan Szelenyi 1979 The Intellectual on the Road to Class Power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krymkowski, Daniel H. 1991 “The process of status attainment among men in Poland, the U.S., and West Germany.” American Sociological Review 56:46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N. andA. E. Maxwell 1971 Factor analysis as a statistical method, 2nd ed. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, James R. andArne L. Kalleberg 1990 Culture Control and Commitment: A Study of Work Organizations and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshal, Gordon, David Rose, Howard Newby, andCarolyn Vogler 1988 Social Class in Modern Britain. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl 1972 Capital III. (originally published 1887) London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno, Ichiu 1974 “Kaikyu Kaisokenkyu no Kadai to Hoho” [The Problem and Method of Research on Class and Status]. Hokkaido Rodo Kenkyu 113:38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane, Chie 1970 Japanese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naoi, Atsushi 1972 “Sangyoka to Kaisou-Kouzou no Henndou” [Industrialization and the Change of Stratification Structure]. In Hiroshi Akuto, Takao Sofue, and Ken'ichi Tominaga (eds.), Henndou-ki no Nihon Shakai: 86–109. Tokyo: Nihon Housou Shutsuppan Kyokai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naoi, Atsushi 1979 “Shokugyo-Teki Chiishakudo no Kosei” [Construction of the Occupational Status Scale]. In Ken'ichi Tominaga (ed.), Nihon no Kaisokozo [Social Stratification Structure in Japan]: Ch. 14. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naoi, Atsushi, andCarmi Schooler 1985 “Occupational conditions and psychological functioning in Japan.” American Journal of Sociology 90:729–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi, Ryuken 1971 Nihon no Kaikyu Kosei [Japan's Class Composition]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicos 1975 Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Robert V., andJonathan Kelley 1979 “Class as conceived by Marx and Dahrendorf: Effects on income inequality and politics in the United States and Great Britain.” American Sociological Review 44:38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, Carmi 1980 “Psychological and social perspectives on status attainment.” Paper presented to the Japan-U.S. Conference on Social Stratification and Mobility, Honolulu, HI.

  • Schooler, Carmi 1990a “Individualism and the historical and social-structural determinants of people's concern over self-directedness and efficacy.” In J. Rodin, C. Schooler, and K. W. Schaie (eds.), Self-directedness and Efficacy: Causes and Effects throughout the Life Course: 19–49. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, Carmi 1990b “The individual in Japanese history: Parallels to and divergences from the European experience. Sociological Forum 5:569–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, Carmi, andAtsushi Naoi 1988 “The psychological effects of traditional and of economically peripheral job settings in Japan.” American Journal of Sociology 94:335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Paul M. 1971 Prestige in the American Occupational Structure. Unpublished dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., andGrazyna Kacprowicz 1979 Skale Zawodow [Scales of Occupations]. Warsaw: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., Joanne Miller, andMelvin L. Kohn 1981 “Stratification, work, and values: A Polish-United States comparison.” American Sociological Review 46:720–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael R. 1990 “What is new in ‘New Structuralist’ analyses of earnings?” American Sociological Review 55:827–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven, Rob 1983 Classes in Contemporary Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, Donald J. 1977 Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ujihara, Shojiro 1966 Nihon Rodo Mondai Kenyu [The Study of Japan's Labor Problem]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin 1985 Classes. London: New Left.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin 1989 “Rethinking, once again, the concept of class structure.” In E. Wright (ed.), The Debate on Classes: 269–348. London: Verson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin andLuca Perrone 1977 “Marxist class categories and income inequality.” American Sociological Review 42:32–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C. Social class, occupational status, occupational self-direction, and job income: A cross-national examination. Sociol Forum 9, 431–458 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01466317

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01466317

Key words

Navigation