Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative soil quality in maize rotations with high or low residue diversity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed differences in soil quality linked to differences in the diversity of residues returned to the soil in nine pairs of farm fields in central Michigan. To assure that management was the main difference within pairs, study sites were selected that mapped to the same soil series. Analysis of variance using subsamples as replicates for all nine comparisons revealed significantly higher maize (Zea mays L.) yield and total and mineralizable N for the high-diversity fields. Manuring history reported by farmers was difficult ro reconcile with levels of total C and extractable P. To account for uncertainty in manuring histories, comparisons were separated into four subsets on the Basis of residue diversity (DVS) and extractable P (high DVS high P, low DVS low P, high DVS low P, and low DVS high P). For these segregates, analysis of variance (ANOVA) using subsamples as replicates revealed significant improvements in 6 of 21 soil quality indices in the high-DVS-P subset. For all nine comparisons, correlation analysis revealed moderately strong relationships between total C, extractable P, as well as their ratio (Ctot/Pext), and both bulk density and log(infiltration time). When the data were segregated as before, these relationships were much stronger for the high-DVS high-P subset, and their slopes differed significantly from those of the other subsets, indicating that the data points originated from different populations. These results suggest a strong interaction between residue diversity, and P likely applied in manure, that influenced soil quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Doran JW (1995) On-farm measurement of soil quality indices — Bulk density, soil water content, water-filled pore space, EC, pH, N03 -N, infiltration, water holding capacity, and soil respiration. In: Jones AJ, Doran JW Liebig MA (eds) After CRP. Soil quality handbook. University of Nebraska and USDA-ARS, Lincoln, Nebraska, pp 28–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Eash NS, Unger PW (1992) Soil and crop management effects on soil quality indicators. Am J Alternat Agric 7:48–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen-Availability indices. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 711–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson WE, Pierce FJ (1994) The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 37–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson D, Paul EA (1982) Microbial biomass. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd ed. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 821–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis, parts 1, 2. Agronomy no 9. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Reganold JP, Palmer AS, Lockhart JC, Macgregor AN (1993) Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Reganold JP (1994) Statistical analyses of soil quality. Science 264:282–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Anderson JM (1993) Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems. In: Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functiona. Ecological studies: Analysis and synthesis, vol. 99. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 15–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1994) Statistical analyses of soil quality. Science 264:281–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson TC, Franco-Vizcaíno E, McGrath CM, Jones ME, Harwood RR (1993) Microbial activity and soil quality: A comparison of high and low diversity farming systems in Michigan. Agronomy Abstracts, p 263

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franco-Vizcaíno, E. Comparative soil quality in maize rotations with high or low residue diversity. Biol Fert Soils 24, 32–38 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420217

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420217

Key words

Navigation