Skip to main content
Log in

Psychosocial maturity and teenage contraceptive use: An investigation of decision-making and communication skills

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The developmental factors influencing teenage women's contraceptive decision-making with first sexual partner are investigated. A discriminant function analysis of results of a study of 17- to 19-year-old women shows the following: Pill users are distinguished from women who have not used any method by having had a longer relationship with their partner, having a more negative attitude towards becoming premaritally pregnant themselves, being older at the time of their sexual debut, engaging in more frequent sexual intercourse, being more trusting of their partner, and perceiving the risks of unprotected pregnancy as greater. Women who are protected by the use of condom are distinguished from women not protected by any method by having had more discussions with male friends about a variety of topics, having better role-taking skills, having a less negative attitude about becoming premaritally pregnant, and having discussed their sexual debut with their partner beforehand. Results are consistent with a conceptualization which distinguishes contraceptive methods on the basis of the psychosocial costs their use incurs for young women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, H. Decision models in population research.Journal of Population 1979,2 (3), 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, W. Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing — growing concerns for Americans.Population Bulletin 1980,31 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. Intermediate fertility variables and marital fertility rates.Population Studies 1976,30 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. Sex without contraception. In D. Byrne & W. A. Fisher (Eds.)Adolescents, Sex, and Contraception. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilman, C. S.Adolescent sexuality in a changing American Society: social and psychological perspectives. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (NIH Publication No. 80-1426), 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G., Grote, B., Bjorseth, A., & Sarkissian, J. On the psychology of adolescents' use of contraception.Journal of Sex Research 1975,11 256–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G., Grote, B., Lieberman, E. S., & Miller, W. Sex role development and teenage fertility-related behavior.Adolescence 1978, 8,50, 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G. & Grote, B. Psychosocial maturity, ego identity and fertility-related behavior. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, New York, September 1979a.

  • Cvetkovich, G. & Grote B. Male teenagers — Sexual debut, psychosocial development and contraceptive use. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, New York, September 1979b.

  • Elkind, D. Egocentrism in adolescence.Child Development 1967,38 1025–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., Edmunds, J., Miller, C., Kelley, K., & White, L. Psychological and situation-specific correlates of contraception behavior among university women.The Journal of Sex Research 1979,15 (1), 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H.The development of role-taking and communication skills. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreit, K. G., & Foreit, J. R. Correlates of contraceptive behavior among unmarried U.S. college students.Studies in Family Planning 1978,9 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugita, B., Wagner, H. J., & Pion, R. J. Contraceptive use among single college students.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1971,109 (5), 787–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, E. S. Measurement issues involved in examining contraceptive use among young single women. Unpublished paper Department of Family Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. K., & Mann, L.Decision-making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. NY: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review 1973,80 237–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantner, J., & Zelnik, M. Sexual and contraceptive experience of young unmarried women in the United States, 1976 and 1971.Family Planning Perspectives 1977,9 (2), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K.Taking chances: Abortion and the decision not to contracept. Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. B. Psychological vulnerability to unwanted pregnancy.Family Planning Perspectives 1975,5 (4), 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mindick, B., & Oskamp, S. Longitudinal predictive research: An approach in methodological problems in studying contraception.Journal of Pupulation 1979,2 (3), 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomba, C. "Snowball" and other control groups.Journal of Vocational Behavior 1975,6 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L., Banwart, A., & Foreman, H. Premarital contraceptive usage: A study and some theoretical explanations.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1875,5 (4), 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinke, S. P., Gilchrist, L. D., & Small, R. W. Preventing unwanted adolescent pregnancy: A cognitive-behavioral approach.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1979,49 (1), 81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, F., Zelnik, M. & T., Kantner, J. Unprotected intercourse among unwed teenagers.Family Planning Perspectives 1975,7 (1), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Kunreuther, H., & White, G. F. Decision processes, rationality, and adjustment to natural hazards. In G. F. White (Ed.)Natural Hazards: Local, National and Global. N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, R. C.Adolescent sexuality in contemporary America. New York: World Publishers, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Spanier, G. B. Influence of parents, peers, and partners on the contraceptive use of college men and women.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1978,8 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. M.Correlational Procedures for Research. N.Y.: Gardner Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science 1974,185 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. L.Social Class in America. N.Y.: Harper Torch Books, 1949, 140–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, L. W., & Zingle, H. W. A self-disclosure inventory for adolescents.Psychological Reports 1969,24 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabin, L. S., Kantner, J. F., & Zelnik, M. The risk of adolescent pregnancy in the first months of intercourse.Family Planning Perspectives 1979,11 (4), 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelnik, M., & Kantner, J. F. Reasons for nonuse of contraception by sexually active women ages 15–19.Family Planning Perspectives 1979,11 (5), 284–296.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by Grant #HD09813, National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. Thanks are due to Robin Halliday, Allyson Myhre, and Carolyn Scheve for help in conducing this investigation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cvetkovich, G., Grote, B. Psychosocial maturity and teenage contraceptive use: An investigation of decision-making and communication skills. Popul Environ 4, 211–226 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01375627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01375627

Keywords

Navigation