Skip to main content
Log in

Randomization tests in single-subject designs: Illustrative examples

  • Published:
Journal of behavioral assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Randomization tests have recently been adapted for use in the analysis of single-subject data. The advantages of these tests lie in their ease of implementation and interpretation as well as their freedom from underlying distributions. Even though numerous articles and books have explicated randomization test procedures, due to the lack of appropriate examples, very little use of these procedures has been made by applied behavior analysts. Data sets reported in a prominent applied behavior journal are used to demonstrate the application of randomization tests to the following three single-subject design models: (a) two-phase random intervention point, (b) multiple phase, and (c) multiple phase with a predicted order of effect size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakeman, R. Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analyses of observational data. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.),Observing behavior: Data collection and analysis methods, Vol. 2. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. V.Distribution-free statistical tests. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J.Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E. S. Randomization tests for one-subject operant experiments.The Journal of Psychology 1975,90 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E. S. Random assignment and statistical tests for one-subject experiments.Behavioral Assessment 1980a,2 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E. S.Randomization tests. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1980b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E. S. Validity of randomization tests for one-subject experiments.Journal of Educational Statistics 1980c,5 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elashoff, J. D., and Thoresen, C. E. Choosing a statistical method for analysis of an intensive experiment. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.),Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, M. J., and Wampold, B. E. An analysis of the interpretation procedures in visual inference. Submitted for publication, 1981.

  • Gentile, J. R., Roden, A. H., and Klein, R. D. An analysis of variance model for the intrasubject replication design.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1972,5 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L., and Gottman, J. M.Design and analysis of time series experiments. Boulder, Colo.: Associated University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., and Glass, G. V. Analysis of interrupted time-series experiments. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.),Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., and Notarius, C. Sequential analysis of observational data using Markov chains. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.),Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. V., Panyan, M., Rabon, D., and Broden, M. Instructing beginning teachers in reinforcement procedures which improve classroom control.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1968,1 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. R., Vaught, R. S., and Weinrott, M. Time series analysis in operant research.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1977,10 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. R., Weinrott, M., and Vaught, R. S. Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inference.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1978,11 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. Statistical analyses for single-case experimental designs. In M. Hersen and D. Barlow (Eds.),Single case experimental designs. New York: Pergamon Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwill, T. R., and Brody, G. H. Single subject designs: A perspective on the controversy over employing statistical inference and implications for research and training in behavior modification.Behavior Modification 1978,2 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. M., Marascuilo, L. A., and Hubert, L. J. N = Nonparametric randomization tests. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.),Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. A. The behavior-therapeutic use of contingency contracting to control an adult behavior problem: Weight control.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1972,5 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marascuilo, L. A., and McSweeney, M.Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revusky, S. H. Some statistical treatments compatible with individual organism methodology.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1967,10 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. W., and Wahler, R. G. Peer reinforcement control of classroom behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1973,6 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., and Furlong, M. J. The heuristics of visual inference.Behavioral Assessment 1981,3 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wampold, B.E., Furlong, M.J. Randomization tests in single-subject designs: Illustrative examples. Journal of Behavioral Assessment 3, 329–341 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350836

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350836

Key words

Navigation