Abstract
Agreement among six physicians for 18 clinical signs in 50 alcoholic patients was prospectively studied. Twenty patients had alcoholic cirrhosis, 14 noncirrhotic alcoholic liver disease, and 16 alcoholics had no clinical or biochemical abnormalities. Agreement was assessed by kappa index for categorical variables and by intraclass correlation coefficient for the others. A good agreement was observed for ascites (r=0.75) and splenomegaly (r=0.75). It was fair for jaundice (r=0.65), Dupuytren's contracture (r=0.65),and vascular spiders (r=0.64). However, it was poor for white nails (r=0.27) and hepatic consistency (r=0.11). Agreement was better among senior physician's than junior physicians. In order to assess which signs contributed to differentiate the three groups of patients, a stepwise discriminant analysis was realized; it identified three variables: vascular spiders (P<0.001), splenomegaly (P<0.001), and abdominal wall collateral veins (P<0.01). These results suggest that studies based on physical findings must be cautiously considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1981, pp 212–226
Theodossi A, Skene AM, Portmann B, Knilljones RP, Patrick RS, Tate RA, Kealey W, Jarvis KJ, O'Brian DJ, Williams R: Observer variation in assessment of liver biopsies including analysis by kappa statistics. Gastroenterology 79:232–241, 1980
Soloway RD, Baggenstoss AH, Schoenfield LT, Summerskill WHJ: Observer error and sampling variability test in evaluation of hepatitis and cirrhosis by liver biopsy. Am J Dig Dis 16:1082–1086, 1971
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Espinoza, P., Ducot, B., Pelletier, G. et al. Interobserver agreement in the physical diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease. Digest Dis Sci 32, 244–247 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297048
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297048