Summary
Several variables have been chosen which might reasonably be expected to explain the interstate migration which has occurred in India. The independent variables used in the study explain a fairly high percentage of the variance in migration between states, and all variables except Uj are significant at the 5 percent level or better. The distance variable consistently has in absolute value the highest elasticity in the various estimated relationships, and it is the variable which contributes most in terms of addition to R2. This result is similar to those of other studies dealing with both advanced and less-developed countries, but it appears that the deterring effects of distance may be greater in India than in other countries studied. Migration in India tends to be away from low-income states and toward high-income states, a finding which is similar to those for Ghana, Egypt, and Brazil. Migration also tends to be away from and to populous states, and while migration is away from highly urbanized states, it does not seem to be toward highly urbanized places in India,ceteris paribus. However, migration does tend to be in the direction of places which are urbanizing rapidly and away from places which are urbanizing slowly. There is evidence that in India mobility tends to increase with increased education; this finding is contrary to what was found for Ghana, Egypt, and Brazil. Migration in India also tends to be toward places which display relatively high levels of educational achievement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beals, R. E., M. B. Levy, and L. N. Moses, “Rationality and Migration in Ghana,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 49 (Nov. 1967), 480–486.
Gallaway, L. E., R. F. Gilbert, and P. E. Smith, “The Economics of Labor Mobility: An Empirical Analysis,”Western Economic Journal, 5 (June 1967), 211–223.
Greenwood, M. J., “An Analysis of the Determinants of Geographic Labor Mobility in the United States,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 51 (May 1969), 189–194.
Greenwood, M. J., “The Determinants of Labor Migration in Egypt,”Journal of Regional Science, 9 (Aug. 1969), 283–290.
Hanna, F. A.,State Income Differentials, 1919–1954 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1959).
Lowry, I. S.,Migration and Metropolitan Growth: Two Analytical Models (San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, 1966).
Manne, A. S., “Calculations for Multiple Producing Areas,” in A. S. Manne, ed.,Investments for Capacity Expansion (London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1967).
Nelson, P., “Migration, Real Income and Information,”Journal of Regional Science, 1 (Spring 1959), 43–74.
Reynolds, L. G. and C. H. Taft,The Evolution of the Wage Structure (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956).
Robinson, H. W., “The Response of Labor to Economic Incentives,” inOxford Studies in the Price Mechanism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951).
Sahota, G. S., “An Economic Analysis of Internal Migration in Brazil,”Journal of Political Economy, 76 (Mar./April 1968), pp. 218–245.
Sjaastad, L. A., “Income and Migration in the United States,” Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1961.
Sjaastad, L. A., “The Costs and Returns of Human Migration,”Journal of Political Economy, LXX, No. 5, Part 2 (Oct. 1962), 80–93.
Todaro, M. P., “A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries,”American Economic Review, 59 (March 1969), 138–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
He is grateful to R. M. Rao for helpful comments, but accepts full responsibility for remaining shortcomings.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenwood, M.J. An analysis of the determinants of internal labor mobility in India. Ann Reg Sci 5, 137–151 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288119
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288119