Skip to main content
Log in

A diagnostic caution in screening for depressed college students

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is the most frequently used research measure for selecting samples of depressed college students, and a cutoff score of 10 is most often used. Although previous studies have examined the diagnostic characteristics of subjects selected in this manner, these studies have been limited to examination of depressive diagnostic features and have focused on samples selected on the basis of a less commonly used cutoff score of 16. This study extends previous research by assessing a broad range of diagnostic characteristics of depressed college students identified using single (1-point) and dual (2-point) administrations of the BDI. Sixty-three college students meeting the BDI criterion for at least mild depression participated in structured interviews based on DSM-III. Results showed a high degree of diagnostic heterogeneity for both methods, although the 2-point criterion increased homogeneity marginally. The BDI screenings occasionally resulted in the selection of individuals with substance abuse disorders, precluding the diagnosis of an affective disorder. A second group of selected individuals contained students with past histories of psychiatric disorders, but no clinical symptoms at present. It is suggested that researchers carefully control for heterogeneity of student samples by following 2-point screening sessions with a brief diagnostic interview.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967).Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depressionArchives of General Psychiatry, 4 561–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumberry, W., Oliver, J. M., & McClure, J. N. (1978). Validation of the Beck Depression Inventory in a university population using a psychiatric estimate as criterion.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, B. J., Fielding, J. M., & Blashki, T. G. (1973). Depression rating scales: A critical review.Archives of General Psychiatry, 28 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, C. G. (1978). A critical review of Seligman's laboratory experiments on learned helplessness in humans.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depue, R. A., & Monroe, S. M. (1978). Learned helplessness in the perspective of the depressive disorders: Conceptual and definitional issues.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, J., & Spitzer, R. L. (1978). A diagnostic interview.Archives of General Psychiatry, 35 837–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S. L. (1978). Research problems in clinical diagnosis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 596–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haier, R. J., Rieder, R. O., Khouri, P. J., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1979). Extreme MMPI scores and the Research Diagnostic Criteria: Screening college men for psychopathology.Archives of General Psychiatry, 30 528–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. (1980). Depression in college students: Beyond the Beck Depression Inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzenbuehler, L. C., Parpal, M., & Matthews, L. (1983). Classifying college students as depressed or nondepressed using the Beck Depression Inventory: An empirical analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 360–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselbrock, V., Stabenau, J., Hesselbrock, M., Mirkin, P., & Meyer, R. (1982). A comparison of two interview schedules, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule.Archives of General Psychiatry, 39 674–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn, P. M., & Teri, L. (1982). Selection of depressed and nondepressed subjects on the basis of self-report data.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 590–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule.Archives of General Psychiatry, 38 381–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounsaville, B. J., Weissman, M. M., Rosenberger, P. H., Wilber, C. H., & Kleber, H. D. (1977). Detecting depressive disorders in drug abusers.Journal of Affective Disorders, 1 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, W. P. (1981). Invalid use of the Beck Depression Inventory to identify depressed college-student subjects: A methodological comment.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangler, R. S., & Printz, A. M. (1980). DSM-III psychiatric diagnosis in a university population.American Journal of Psychiatry, 137 937–940.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was conducted as part of the first author's M.S. thesis. We express our appreciation to the following without whose help this study could not have been conducted: Madeline Barnes, Allan F. Chino, Louis Damis, Michael Kippes, Christine Childers Michael, and Sue Slade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deardorff, W.W., Funabiki, D. A diagnostic caution in screening for depressed college students. Cogn Ther Res 9, 277–284 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183847

Keywords

Navigation