Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of persuasive communication research for the modification of self-statements

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the fundamental therapeutic goals of cognitive behavior therapy is to change maladaptive beliefs that a client holds about him/herself, a procedure often designated as cognitive restructuring, cognitive relabeling, or self-statement modification. The purpose of this paper is to propose that the persuasive communication research offers heuristic suggestions regarding factors that might be taken into account by the cognitive behavioral scientist/clinician concerned with the modification of self-statements. Source, message, and audience variables have all been shown to affect the degree of attitude change obtained through persuasive communications. In the present analogy the therapist is considered the source, the client is the audience, and the content of the message is the adaptive set of self-statements the therapist would like to persuade the client to come to believe. The latter are proposed therapeutic self-statements rather than the naturally occurring, internal cognitive responses/thoughts that the clients will make both prior to and after receiving such a communication. Relevant issues and factors that might affect the content and perceived credibility of these proposed self-statements are discussed as they relate to cognitive behavior therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A.Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T.Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A. E. Cognitive therapy and behavior therapy. Foci for a multidimensional approach to treatment.Behavior Therapy 1970,1 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. The effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall and persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.

  • Cook, T. D., & Flay, B. F. The persistence of experimentally induced attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, L. W. Self-instructional training for assertive-refusal behavior.Behavior Therapy 1979,10 529–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, W. E., Craighead, L. W., & Meyers, A. W. New directions in behavior modification with children. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller (Eds.),Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, W. E., Kazdin, A. E., & Mahoney, M. J.Behavior modification: Principles, issues, and applications. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, W. E., Kimball, W. H., & Rehak, P. J. Mood changes, physiological response, and self-statements during social rejection imagery.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979,47 385–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, F. J. Effects of involvement, competence and discrepancy on opinion change.Journal of Social Psychology 1972,87 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulany, D. E. Awareness, rules, and propositional control: A confrontation with S-R behavior therapy. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Himmelfarb, S. Current trends in attitude theory and research. In S. Himmelfarb & A. H. Eagly (Eds.),Reading in attitude change. New York: Wiley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A.Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorn, G. J. Effects of ego-involvement, communication discrepancy and communicator prestige on attitude change (Doctoral dissertation).Dissertation Abstracts International 1971,33 1-B, p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. On defining attitudes and attitude theory. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.),Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Albert, R. D. Acceptance and recall of improvised arguments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,8 31–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1957,55 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., & Janis, I. L. (Eds.),Personality and persuasibility. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, J. L., & Kelly, H. H.Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. Covert modeling and the reduction of avoidance behavior.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1973,81 87–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. Covert modeling, model similarity and reduction of avoidance behavior.Behavior Therapy 1974,3 325–340. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. The effect of model identity and fear-relevant similarity on covert modeling.Behavior Therapy 1974,5 624–635. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A.The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change.Journal of Conflict Resolution 1958,2 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. Processes of opinion change.Public Opinion Quarterly 1961,25 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, C. A.The psychology of commitment. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, C. A., Collins, B. E., & Miller, N.Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York: Wiley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J. The psychophysiology of anxiety. In H. Akiskal (Ed.),Psychiatric diagnosis: Exploration of biological criteria. New York: Spectrum, in press.

  • Lazarus, A. A.Multimodal behavior therapy. New York: Springer, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J.Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. Psychotherapy and the structure of personal revolutions. In M. J. Mahoney (Ed.),Psychotherapy process. New York: Plenum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief defense in producing immunity against persuasion.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1961,62 327–337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. Examination of model characteristics in reducing avoidance behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,17 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. Toward a cognitive theory of self-control. In G. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research. New York: Plenum Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D.Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. Involvement and dogmatism as inhibitors of attitude change.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1965,1 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G.Personality. New York: Harper & Row, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.).Cognitive responses in persuasion: A text in attitude change. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.

  • Rhine, R. J., & Severance, L. J. Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. Psychological selectivity in self-esteem formation. In C. W. Sherif & M. Sherif (Eds.),Attitude, ego-involvement, and change. New York: Wiley, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. M., & Gottman, J. M. Toward a task analysis of assertive behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1976,44 910–920.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C. W.Orientation in social psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C. W., Kelly, M., Rogers, H. L., Sarup, G., & Tittler, B. I. Personal involvement, social judgment and action.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,27 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I.Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, G. L., Amatu, H. I., Blakey, R. S., & Burns, L. E. Contributions of overt instructional rehearsal and “specific insight” to the effectiveness of self-instructional training: A preliminary study.Behavior Therapy 1976,7 504–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C.Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craighead, L.W., Craighead, W.E. Implications of persuasive communication research for the modification of self-statements. Cogn Ther Res 4, 117–134 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173644

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173644

Keywords

Navigation