Skip to main content
Log in

Memory bias in panic disorder: An investigation of the cognitive avoidance hypothesis

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals with panic disorder (n = 14) and normal controls (n = 14) performed two different memory tasks: a high-speed recognition task that measured perceptual memory (memory for the sensory/perceptual features of a stimulus) and a free recall task that measured semantic memory (memory for the meaning associated with the stimulus). Subjects' memory for threatening, positive, and neutral words was evaluated. In contrast to normal controls, panic disorder patients showed better perceptual memory and better semantic memory for threat words compared to positive and neutral words. These results suggest that the panic disorder individuals engaged in preferential processing of threat information at both a perceptual and semantic level of analysis. The results do not support a “cognitive avoidance” hypothesis which predicts the inhibition of more elaborate and meaningful processing of threat stimuli in anxious subjects. The conditions under which cognitive avoidance might occur are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Craske, M. G., Cerny, J. A., & Klosko, J. S. (1989). Behavioral treatment of panic disorder.Behavior Therapy, 20 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985).Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist, 36 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1987). Commentary on mood and memory.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, I. S., Jones, L. M., Robertson, S. A., Radcliffe, W. N., & Emerson, E. (1981). The degree of control exerted by phobic and nonphobic verbal stimuli over the recognition behavior of phobic and non-phobic subjects.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24 461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104 268–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A., Margraf, J., Davies, S., & Roth, W. T. (1988). Selective processing of threat cues in subjects with panic attacks.Cognition and Emotion, 2 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information.Psychological Bulletin, 99 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Sensitivity to feared stimuli in obsessive-compulsives: A dichotic listening analysis.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folstein, M. F., & Luria, R. (1973). Reliability, validity, and clinical application of the visual analogue mood scale.Psychological Medicine, 3 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1988).React [Computer program in the public domain].

  • Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23 553–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, J. B., & Borkovec, T. D. (1978). The effects of expectancy and imagined response to phobic stimuli on fear reduction.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, D. A., Rapee, R. M., Heimberg, R. G., & Dombeck, M. (1990). Representations of the self in social phobia: Vulnerability to social threat.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110 306–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K. (1983). A multiple entry, modular memory system. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 81–123). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Kim, J. K., & Risse, G. (1985). Do alcoholic Korsakoff syndrome patients acquire affective reactions?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology-Section A, 40A 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., Williams, R., & Clark, D. M. (1991). Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information?Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews A., & MacLeod, C. (1985). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23 563–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1986). Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety states.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., Mogg, K., May, J., & Eysenck, M. (1989). Implicit and explicit memory bias in anxiety.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98 236–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Foa, E. B., & Donnell, C. D. (1989). Memory bias for anxiety information in patients with panic disorder.Cognition and Emotion, 3 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., & Kim, E. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Weinman, J. (1987). Memory bias in clinical anxiety.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Weinman, J. (1989). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states: A replication.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976).Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, L., & Rachman, S. (1981) Intrusive thoughts: The effects of an uncontrived stress.Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuberth, R. F., & Eimas, P. (1977). Effects of context on the classification of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, W. P. (1939).Shipley Institute of Living Scale for Measuring Intellectual Impairment: Manual for directions and scoring. Hartford, CT: Institute of Living.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970).Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Gibbon, M. (1987).Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., Trezise, L., & Sharrock, R. (1986). Processing of phobic stimuli.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988).Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Rick Heimberg, Craig Holt, and Debra Holt for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper as well as Diane Arnkoff and two anonymous reviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cloitre, M., Liebowitz, M.R. Memory bias in panic disorder: An investigation of the cognitive avoidance hypothesis. Cogn Ther Res 15, 371–386 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173032

Key words

Navigation