Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Kaltostat with Jelonet in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective, randomised, controlled study compared Kaltostat with Jelonet in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites in 40 patients. The healing time, quality of regenerated skin, ease of removal of dressing, the rates of infection and convenience of the dressing in clinical use were compared. Dressings were changed after 8 days and healing of the donor site was assessed. The mean time from operation to observation of complete healing was 8.5 days for the donor areas dressed with Kaltostat and 11.5 days for the donor areas dressed with Jelonet. Much greather patient comfort when the dressing is first removed and much better quality of regenerated skin were seen under Kaltostat dressings. It was concluded that Kaltostat is superior to Jelonet as a dressing for split-thickness skin graft donor sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attwood AI (1989) Calcium alginate dressing accelerates split skin graft donor site healing. Br J Plast Surg 42:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basse P, Siim E, Lohmann M (1992) Treatment of donor sitescalcium alginate versus paraffin gauze. Acta Chir Plast 34:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blair SD, Backhouse CM, Harper R, Matthews J, for Mc. Collum CN (1988) Comparison of absorbable materials surgical haemostasis. Br J Surg 75:969

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butler PEM, Eadie PA, Lawlor D, Edwards G, McHugh M (1993) Bupivacain and kaltostat reduces post-operative donor site pain. Br J Plast Surg 46:523–524

    Google Scholar 

  5. Groves AR, Lawrence JC (1986) Alginate dressings as a donor site haemostat. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68:27

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lawrence JE, Blake GB (1991) A comparison of calcium alginate and scarlet red dressings in the healing of split thickness skin graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg 44:247–249

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence JE (1975) The use of opsite, a vapour permeable dressing, on skin graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg 28:107

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oliver LC, Blaine G (1949) Haemostasis with absorbable alginates in neurosurgical practice. Br J Surg 37:307

    Google Scholar 

  9. Porter JM (1991) A comparative investigation of re-epithelialisation of split skin graft donor areas after application of hydrocolloid and alginate dressings. Br J Plast Surg 44:333–337

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vanstraelen P (1992) Comparison of calcium sodium alginate and porcine xenograft (E-Z DERM) in the healing of split-theickness skin graft donor sites. Burns 18:145–148

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cihantimur, B., Kahveci, R. & Özcan, M. Comparing Kaltostat with Jelonet in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Eur J Plast Surg 20, 260–263 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01159489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01159489

Key words

Navigation