Abstract
We analyze male occupational attainment using separate models in which occupational level is measured by indigenous socioeconomic index (SEI) scales, indigenous prestige scales, and a common prestige scale. Other than some consistent societal differences, the SEI scales produce highly similar results in both societies. In sharp contrast, both indigenous and common prestige scales indicate a stronger relative effect of origin (compared with education) on occupation in Great Britain. The dimensions of prestige and socioeconomic status thus seem to tap different aspects of the social mobility process, and the societies differ in the transmission of prestige but not socioeconomic status.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burawoy, Michael 1977 “Social structure, homogenization and the process of status attainment in the United States and Great Britain.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1031–1042.
Campbell, Richard T. 1983 “Status attainment research: End of the beginning or beginning of the end?” Sociology of Education 56:47–62.
Clausen, John A., ed. 1968 Socialization and Society. Boston: Little, Brown.
Cohen, Jacob andPatricia Cohen 1983 Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Duncan, Otis D. 1961 “A socioeconomic index for all occupations.” In A. J. Reiss, Jr. (ed.), Occupations and Social Status: 109–138. New York: Free Press.
Erikson, Robert andJohn H. Goldthorpe 1985 “Are American rates of social mobility exceptionally high? New evidence on an old issue.” European Sociological Review 1:1–22.
Featherman, David L. andRobert M. Hauser 1978 Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
Goldthorpe, John H. 1980 Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goldthorpe, John H. andKeith Hope 1974 The Social Grading of Occupations: A New Approach and Scale. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grusky, David B. andRobert M. Hauser 1984 “Comparative social mobility revisited: Models of convergence and divergence in 16 countries.” American Sociological Review 49:19–38.
Halsey, A. H., A. F. Health, andJ. M. Ridge 1980 Origins and Destinations: Family, Class and Education in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hauser, Robert M. andDavid L. Featherman 1977 The Process of Stratification: Trends and Analyses. New York: Academic Press.
Hauser, Robert M., Shu-Ling Tsai, andWilliam H. Sewell 1983 “A model of stratification with response error in social and psychological variables.” Sociology of Education 56:20–46.
Heise, David R. 1972 “Employing nominal variables, induced variables and block variables in path analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 1:147–173.
Hodge, Robert W., Vered Kraus, andGarry S. Meyer 1985 “Political ideology and occupational evaluations: A comparative analysis.” In Hermann Strasser and John H. Goldthorpe (eds.), Die Analyse der Sozialen Ungleichheit: Kontinuitat-Erneverung-Innovation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Hope, Keith 1972 The Analyses of Social Mobility: Methods and Approaches. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jones, F. Lancaster 1971 “Occupational achievement in Australia and the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 77:527–539.
Kerckhoff, Alan C., Richard T. Campbell, andJerry M. Trott 1982 “Dimensions of educational and occupational attainment in Great Britain.” American Sociological Review 47:347–364.
Kerckhoff, Alan C., Richard T. Campbell, andIdee Winfield-Laird 1985 “Social mobility in Great Britain and the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 91:281–307.
Lipset, Seymour M. 1963 “The value patterns of democracy: A case study in comparative analysis.” American Sociological Review 28:515–531.
Marsden, Peter V. 1982 “A note on block variables in multi-equation models.” Social Science Research 11:127–140.
Raffe, David 1979 “The ‘alternative route’ reconsidered: Part-time further education in England and Wales.” Sociology 13:47–73.
Robinson, Robert V. andWendell Bell 1978 “Equality, success and social justice in England and the United States.” American Sociological Review 43: 125–143.
Siegel, Paul M 1971 “Prestige in the American occupational structure.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Treas, Judith andAndrea Tyree 1979 “Prestige versus socioeconomic status in the attainment processes of American men and women.” Social Science Research 8:201–221.
Treiman, Donald J. 1977 Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
Treiman, Donald J. andKermit Terrell 1975 “The process of status attainment in the United States and Great Britain.” American Journal of Sociology 81:563–583.
1960 “Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system.” American Sociological Review 25:855–867.
1966 “Acceptance of irregular mobility in Britain and the United States.” Sociometry 29:334–352.
Winfield, Idee, Richard T. Campbell, Alan C. Kerckhoff, Diane D. Everett, and Jerry M. Trott forthcoming “Career processes in Great Britain and the United States.” Social Forces.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerckhoff, A.C., Campbell, R.T., Trott, J.M. et al. The transmission of socioeconomic status and prestige in Great Britain and the United States. Sociol Forum 4, 155–177 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112419
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112419