Abstract
We review a series of experiments investigating lexical influences in parsing sentences with long-distance dependencies. We report three primary results. First, gaps are posited and filled immediately following verbs that are typically used transitively, even when the filler is an implausible object of the verb. However, gaps are not posited after verbs that are typically used intransitively. Second, plausibility determines whether or not a filler is treated as the object of a verb when the verb is typically used with both a direct object and an infinitive complement. Finally, verb control information is used immediately in determining which noun phrase will be interpreted as the “understood” subject of an infinitive complement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boland, J., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Garnsey, S.M. (1989).Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in parsing. Manuscript submitted.
Carlson, G.N., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.),Thematic relations. New York: Academic Press.
Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (1986). The use of syntactic information in filling gaps.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 209–224.
Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1988). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. Carlson & M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Connine, C. (1984). Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 696–708.
Connine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1984). Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 307–319.
Crain, S., & Fodor, J.D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D.R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A.M. Zwicky (Eds.),Natural language parsing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fodor, J.D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformation.Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427–473.
Fodor, J.D. (1988). On modularity in syntactic processing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 125–168.
Ford, M., & Dalrymple, M. (1988). A note on some psychological evidence and alternative grammars.Cognition, 29, 63–71.
Frazier, L., Clifton, C.J., & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension.Cognition, 13, 187–222.
Garnsey, S.M., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Chapman, R.M. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 51–60.
Stowe, L. (1986). Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location.Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245.
Stowe, L., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1989).Use of lexical preferences and plausibility information in gap-filling. Manuscript in preparation.
Tanenhaus, M.K., & Carlson, G.N. (in press). Lexical structure and language comprehension. In W.D. Marlsen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Tanenhaus, M.K., Garnsey, S.M., & Boland, J. (1989).Argument-structure and the parsing of sentences with long-distance dependencies. Manuscript in preparation.
Tanenhaus, M., Stowe, L., & Carlson, G. (1985). The interaction of lexical expectation and pragmatics in parsing filler-gap constructions. InProceedings of the Seventh Annual Cognitive Science Society Meetings, pp. 361–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tanenhaus, M.K., Boland, J., Garnsey, S.M. et al. Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies. J Psycholinguist Res 18, 37–50 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069045
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069045