Abstract
In this paper we report our finding that the parsing routine responsible for locating the deep-structure position of a wh-phrase operates independently of semantic/pragmatic knowledge, suggesting a modular organization of the human sentence processor. Specifically, wh-phrases that were semantically implausible as a direct object of the matrix verb were nonetheless reactivated in that position. Further, reactivation of the wh-phrase was observed despite the fact that the matrix verbs were three-place predicates (e.g.,remind) — a class of verbs which, some experiments suggest, allow interactive effects (e.g., Tanenhaus, Boland, Garnsey, & Carlson, 1989). We argue that this disparity in findings is due to the difference between the cross-modal lexical priming (CMLP) task used in the present study, and the tasks used by Tanenhaus et al.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlson, G. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.),Thematic relations. New York: Academic Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1983).Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformation.Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427–473.
Fodor, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 155–209.
Fodor, J. D. (1990). Thematic roles and modularity: Comments on the chapters by Frazier and Tanenhaus et al. In G. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Garnsey, S., Tanenhaus, M., & Chapman, R. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 51–60.
Hickok, G. (1991).Studies on the architecture and computational machinery of the human sentence processor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). Against modularity. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.),Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance Vol XII: The psychology of Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nicol, J. (1988).Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Nicol, J. (1989). What the parser knows about the grammar: Psycholinguistic evidence.Proceedings of WCCFL VIII.
Nicol, J., & Osterhout, L. (1988).Reactivating antecedents of empty categories during parsing. Unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–19.
Stern, C., Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. (1991). The time course of automatic lexical access and aging.Brain and Language, 40, 359–372.
Swinney, D. A. (1991). The resolution of indeterminacy during language comprehension: Perspectives on modularity in lexical, structural, and pragmatic processing. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence, pp. 367–385. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Swinney, D., Ford, M., Frauenfelder, U., & Bresnan, J. (1988). On the temporal course of gap-filling and antecedent assignment during sentence comprehension. In B. Grosz, R. Kaplan, M. Macken, & I. Sag (Eds.),Language structure and processing. Stanford, CA: SCLI.
Swinney, D., & Osterhout, L. (1990). Inference generation during auditory language comprehension.The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 25, 17–33.
Tanenhaus, M., Boland, J., Garnsey, S., & Carlson, G. (1989). Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 37–50.
Tanenhaus, M., & Carslon, G. (1989). Lexical structure and language comprehension. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G., & Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 211–234.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., & Boland, J. (1990). Combinatory lexical information and language comprehension. In G. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wayland, S. C. (1990).How much of a word must be specified before its meaning is available to the listener? A study of semantic activation during the spoken word. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge Penny Prather, Catherine Stern, and David Swinney for their technical assistance, and also Brian Hickok. This work has also benefitted from helpful discussions with Michael Tanenhaus and Stephen Crain, as well as from the comments of two anonymous reviewers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hickok, G., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Zurif, E. et al. Modularity in locating Wh-gaps. J Psycholinguist Res 21, 545–561 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067530
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067530