Skip to main content
Log in

Centrifugal effects on amacrine cells in the frog's retina

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

The effect of electrical stimulation of the optic nerve on various cells in the frog's retina was investigated by two methods: by the histochemical method (measurement of the amount of RNA in separate cells), and by intracellular recording of potentials. Rhythmic (5 per sec) stimulation of the nerve induced an increase in the amount of RNA in ganglion cells, and especially in amacrine cells. The level of RNA in bipolar and horizontal cells did not change. The results of the experiment indicate that in frogs (as in birds) centrifugal effects are produced through amacrine cells. In electrophysiological experiments reactions to stimulation of the nerve were manifested only in ganglion and amacrine cells. In the ganglion cells that was an antidromic impulse, but sometimes also a delayed impulse, which was evidently the result of secondary excitation of the cell. In amacrine cells the response consisted of a short excitant postsynaptic potential with a discharge of impulses superimposed on it. Data are presented indicating the existence of amacrine cells of different types, probably fulfilling different functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. V. Ya. Brodskii, Cell Nutrition [in Russian], Nauka (1966).

  2. A. L. Byzov, "Analysis of distribution of potentials and currents within the retina on light stimulation. I. Activity of bipolar cells of two types," Biofizika,4, 689–701 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. L. Byzov, Electrophysiological Investigation of the Retina [in Russian], Nauka (1966).

  4. A. L. Byzov, N. A. Polishchuk, and G. M. Zenkin, "Impulse and nonimpulse transmission of signals in the vertebrate retina," Neirofiziologiya,2, 536–543 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. M. Zenkin, V. V. Maksimov, and A. L. Byzov, "Investigation of horizontal interaction at the level of slow bipolar cells in the frog's retina. I. Effect of diffuse light and some features of interaction," Biofizika,9, 612–620 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. V. Minor, G. I. Flerova, and A. L. Byzov, "Total evoked potentials and activity of solitary neurons in the olfactory bulb of the frog," Neirofiziologiya,1, 269–277 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. A. Ostrovskii, "Descending effects on the retina of the frog's eye," Biofizika,7, 55–63 (1962).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. I. A. Utina, "Investigation of the activity of bipolar cells of two types by the UV cytophotometric method," Biofizika,5, 626–630 (1960).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. I. A. Utina, "Changes in RNA content in horizontal and amacrine cells in the frog's retina in different lighting conditions," Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,157, 1216–1218 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Abe, "Effect of section and compression of the optic nerve on the ERG in the rabbit," Tohoku J. Exptl. Med.,78, 223–227 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. S. Brindley and D. J. Hamasaki, "Evidence that the cat's electroretinogram is not influenced by impulses passing to the eye along the optic nerve," J. Physiol. (Eng.),163, 558–565 (1962).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. W. M. Cowan, "Centrifugal fibres to the avian retina," Brit. Med. Bull.,26, 112–118 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. S. Dogiel, "Die Retina der Vögel," Arch. mikr. Anat.,44, 622–648 (1895).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. E. Dowling, "Synaptic organization of the frog retina: an electron microscopic analysis comparing the retinas of frog and primates," Proc. Roy. Soc., B,170, 205–228 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. E. Dowling and W. M. Cowan, "An electron microscope study of normal and degenerating centrifugal fiber terminals in the pigeon retina," Z. Zellforsch.,71, 14–28 (1966).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. C. Eccles, Physiology of Nerve Cells, Baltimore (1957).

  17. B. Ehinger, B. Falck, and A. M. Laties, "Adrenergic neurons in Teleost retina," Z. Zellforsch. und microsc. Anat.,97, 285–297 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Granit, Sensory Mechanisms of the Retina, Oxford (1947).

  19. J. H. Jacobson and G. F. Gestring, "Centrifugal influence upon the electroretinogram," Arch. Ophthalmol.,60, 295–302 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kaneko, "Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar, and amacrine cells in goldfish retina," J. Physiol. (Engl.),207, 623–633 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. T. E. Ogden and K. T. Brown, "Intraretinal responses of the cynamolgus monkey to electrical stimulation of the optic nerve and retina," J. Neurophysiol.,27, 682–705 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. S. L. Polyak, The Retina, Chicago (1941).

  23. S. Ramon y Cajal, Die Retina der Wirbelthiere, Wiesbaden (1894).

  24. K. Tasaki, A. C. Norton, and J. Fukada, "Effect of optic nerve stimulation on the intraretinal ERG of the cat," Tohoku J. Exptl. Med.,78, 142–146 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. S. Werblin and J. E. Dowling, "Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy,Necturus maculosus. 11. Intracellular recording," J. Neurophysiol.,32, 339–355 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Institute of Information Transmission, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 293–300, May–June, 1971.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byzov, A.L., Utina, I.A. Centrifugal effects on amacrine cells in the frog's retina. Neurophysiology 3, 219–224 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065496

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065496

Keywords

Navigation