Abstract
The crime of arson is complicated in part because of the motives associated with the offense and the vast assortment of combustible objects or targets deliberately burned in urban areas. This research attempts to conceptualize the crime in light of criminal law and demonstrates that arson occupies a rather unique position. Although classified as a property crime, the legislative intent appears to focus on the protection of human life. Moreover, legislative developments have brought us to the point where burning almost any property is designated arson. There is a growing concern over the incidence of arson, but there has been little discussion of how to calculate the arson rate when the targets of opportunity are not known. The exploratory research presented here addresses the structure of arson rates by using an assortment of indirect and direct measures of opportunity as denominators in the calculation of the arson rate. Factor analysis reduces a 27×27 correlation matrix to six significant factors and demonstrates that some measures share the same underlying rate structure. By using a factorbase scale (dependent variable) for each factor and a set of independent variables, regression analysis reveals that there are differences in the direction of association, the degree of association, and the types of independent variables that associate with different measures of the arson rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Law Institute (1962).Model Penal Code—Tentative Drafts Nos. 11, 12, and 23, Proposed Final Draft No. 1, American Law Institute, Philadelphia, Pa.
Amir, M. (1971).Patterns in Forcible Rape, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Boggs, S. L. (1965). Urban crime patterns.Am. Soc. Rev. 30: 899–908.
Boudreau, J. F.,et al. (1983). The nature and magnitude of arson. In Rapkin, C. (ed.),The Social and Economic Consequences of Residential Fires, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.
Brace, T. (1981). An analysis of arson in a socio-economic framework: Revisited 1976–1978, conclusion.Fire Arson Invest. 31(3): 3–30.
Carter, R. L., and Hill, K. Q. (1976). The criminal image of the city and urban crime patterns.Soc. Sci. Q. 57: 597–607.
Clarke, R. V. (1984). Opportunity-based crime rates.Br. J. Crim. 24(1): 74–83.
Curtis, A. (1936).The Law of Arson, Dennis, Buffalo, N.Y.
Davidson, R. N. (1981).Crime and Environment, Croom Helm, London.
Erickson, M. L., Gibbs, J. P., and Jensen, G. F. (1977). Conventional and special crime and delinquency rates.J. Crim. Law Crim. 68: 404–453.
Frisbie, D. W.,et al. (1977).Crime in Minneapolis, Governor's Commission on Crime Prevention and Control, St. Paul, Minn.
Gibbs, J. P., and Erickson, M. L. (1976). Crime rates of American cities in an ecological context.Am. J. Soc. 82: 605–620.
Gunther, P. (1981). Fire-cause patterns for different socioeconomic neighborhoods in Toledo, Ohio.Fire J. 74(3): 52–60.
Harries, K. (1981). Alternative denominators in conventional crime rates. In Bratingham, P., and Brantingham, P. (eds.),Environmental Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., pp. 147–166.
Harries, K. (1980).Crime and the Environment, Charles Thomas, Springfield, Ill.
International City Manager's Association (1967). Municipal Fire Administration, Chicago.
Karter, M. J., and Donner, A. (1978). The effect of demographics on fire rates.Fire J. 72(1): 51–61.
Kim, J., and Mueller, C. W. (1978).Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Lambert, J. R. (1970).Crime, Police, and Race Relations, Oxford University Press for the Institute of Race Relations, London.
Lottier, S. (1938). Distribution of criminal offenses in sectional regions.J. Crim. Law Crim. Pol. Sci. 29(3): 329–344.
MacDonald, J. M. (1960). Many motivations are behind acts of the arsonist.FBI Law Enforce. Bull. 29(7): 4–10.
McClintock, F. H. (1963).Crimes of Violence, Macmillan, London.
Morris, T. P. (1957).The Criminal Area, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
National Board of Fire Underwriters (1956).Suggestions for Arson Investigators, National Board of Fire Underwriters, New York, NY.
Normandeau, A. (1969). Robbery in Philadelphia and London.Br. J. Crim. 9: 71–79.
Pettiway, L. E. (1983). Arson and American city types.J. Environ. Sys. 13(2): 157–176.
Pettiway, L. E. (1984). Retaliatory arsons: The demographic and environmental contexts of revenge, Unpublished manuscript. Presented at the 1984 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Phillips, P. D. (1973). Risk-related crime rates and crime patterns.Proc. Assoc. Am. Geog. 5: 221–224.
Pyle, G. F. (1976). Spatial and temporal aspects of crime in Cleveland, Ohio.Am. Behav. Sci. 20: 175–197.
Rengert, G. R. (1981). Burglary in Philadelphia: A critique of an opportunity structure model. In Brantingham, P., and Brantingham, P. (eds.),Environmental Criminology, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., pp. 189–202.
Reppetto, T. A. (1974).Residential Crime, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.
Rider, A. O. (1980). The firesetter: A psychological profile.Fire Arson Invest. 31(2): 3–21.
Schmid, C. (1939). Research techniques in human ecology. In Young, P. (ed.),Scientific Social Surveys and Social Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 406–445.
Sparks, R. F. (1980). Criminal opportunities and crime rates. In Fienberg, S. E., and Reiss, A. (eds.),Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 18–28.
Sternlieb, G., and Burchell, R. W. (1983). Fires in abandoned buildings. In Rapkin, C. (ed.),The Social and Economic Consequences of Residential Fires, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., pp. 261–270.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (1975).1974 Wildfiire Statistics, U.S. Department of Agricul-ture, Washington, D.C.
Waller, I., and Okihiro, N. (1978).Burglary: The Victim and the Public, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pettiway, L.E. Measures of opportunity and the calculation of the arson rate: The connection between operationalization and association. J Quant Criminol 1, 241–268 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064635
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064635