Skip to main content
Log in

A model for the release of sulfur from elemental S and superphosphate

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mathematical model was developed to predict the release of sulfate from elemental S (S0) and gypsum in single superphosphate. The release algorithm is based on the observation that release is linearly related to particle surface area. Release rates under various conditions could then be described by the change in radius for each time increment, which allows easier comparison of release rates between different particle sizes. A model based on spherical particles was found to be adequate in accounting for the range of particle shapes found in crushed agricultural S0. Release rates calculated from experimental data range from 0.07 to 0.45µm/d depending on environmental conditions.

Equations for incorporating the effects of environmental variables and the release of S from S0 and from the gypsum component of single superphosphate (SSP) were developed from the literature, and were incorporated within a larger model of S cycling. The model predicted that after 72 days, 99% of the S in SSP would have been released, compared to a release after one year of 54% of the S in sulfur-fortified superphosphate, and 23% of that in crushed agricultural grade S0. The model provides a means of assessing the effect of the particle size of S0 on release rates and should allow the formulation of fertilizers that supply S at a rate closer to the rate of plant uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrow NJ (1971) Slowly available fertilizers in southwestern Australia. 1. Elemental sulfur. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 11: 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boswell CC, Owers WR, Swanney B and Rothbaum HP (1988) Sulfur/sodium bentonite mixtures as sulfur fertilizers. 1. The effects of S/Na-bentonite ratios on the rate of dispersion and particle size distribution of elemental sulfur dispersed from laboratory-produced prills. Fert Res 15: 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brunauer S, Emmett PH and Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 59: 309–319

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chopra SL and Kanwa JS (1968) Effect of some factors on the transformation of elemental sulfur in soils. Indian Soc Soil Sci J 16: 83–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fawzi Abed, MAH (1976) Rate of elemental sulfur oxidation in some soils of Egypt as affected by the salinity level, moisture content, temperature and inoculation. Beitr Trop Landwirtsch Veterinarmed 14: 179–185

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox RL, Atelsalp HM, Kampbell DH and Rhoades HF (1964a) Factors influencing the availability of sulfur fertilizers to alfalfa and corn. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 28: 406–408

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fox RL, Flowerday AD, Hosterman FW, Rhoades HF and Olson RA (1964b) Sulfur fertilizers for alfalfa production in Nebraska. Nebraska Agric Exp Sta Bull No 214

  8. Hutchinson KJ and Roper MM (1985) The importance of plant and animal residues in the nutrient economies of pasture and cropping systems. In: R.A. Leng et al., (eds). Reviews in Rural Science, 6, 207–218. Biotechnology and recombinant DNA technology in the animal production industries. Armidale: University of New England

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones MN and Ruckman JE (1969) Effect of particle size on long-term availability of sulfur on annual-type grasslands. Agron J 61: 936–939

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keimnec G, Jackson TLK and Mosher W (1981) Fertilizing subclover with elemental sulfur. Sulfur in Agric 5: 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kittims HA and Attoe OJ (1965) Availability of phosphorus in rock phosphate-sulfur fusions. Agron J 57: 331–334

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li P and Caldwell AC (1966) The oxidation of elemental sulfur in soil. Proc Soil Sci Am 30: 370–372

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCaskill MR (1984) The residual effects of elemental sulfur as a pasture fertilizer. M Ru Sci Thesis. Armidale: University of New England

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCaskill MR and Blair GJ (1987) Particle size and soil texture effects on elemental sulfur oxidation. Agron J 79(6): 1079–1083

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCaskill MR and Blair GJ (1988) Development of a simulation model of sulfur cycling in grazed pastures. Biogeochem 5: 165–181

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moser US and Olson RV (1953) Sulfur oxidation in four soils as influenced by soil moisture tension and sulfur bacteria. Soil Sci 76: 251–256

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shedley CD (1982) An evaluation of elemental sulfur as a pasture fertilizer. PhD Thesis. Armidale: University of New England

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spencer K (1968) Availability to clover of sulfur as gypsum and brimstone of different particle sizes. Fld Stn Rec, Aust. CSIRO Div. Plant Industry 7: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weir RG, Barkus B and Atkinson WT (1963) The effect of particle size on the availability of brimstone sulfur to white clover. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 3: 314–318

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williams CH (1969) Moisture uptake by surface-applied superphosphate and movement of the phosphate and sulfate into the soil. Aust J Soil Res 7: 307–316

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams CH (1971a) Reaction of surface-applied superphosphate with soil. 1. The fertilizer solution and its initial reaction with soil. Aust J Soil Res 9: 83–94

    Google Scholar 

  22. Williams CH (1971b) Reaction of surface-applied superphosphate with soil. 2. Movement of the phosphorus and sulfur into the soil. Aust J Soil Res 9: 95–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCaskill, M.R., Blair, G.J. A model for the release of sulfur from elemental S and superphosphate. Fertilizer Research 19, 77–84 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054678

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054678

Key words

Navigation