Skip to main content
Log in

Failed predation or transportation? Causes and consequences of phoretic behavior in the pseudoscorpionDinocheirus arizonensis (Pseudoscorpionida: Chernetidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pseudoscorpion Dinocheirus arizonensisinhabits rotting saguaro cactus in the Sonoran Desert and has also been found attached to the legs of the cactophilic neriid fly, Odontoloxozus longicornis.Laboratory experiments demonstrated a higher incidence of phoresy on eclosing versus postteneral adult flies, a female bias in phoresy, and an increased rate in female phoresy through time. The pseudoscorpion may also prey on the fly, but predation rate was unaffected by fly category, pseudoscorpion gender, or food deprivation. A study of pseudoscorpion colonization in the field indicated that females were the first to colonize and the first to abandon the transient habitat of a saguaro rot and, thus, corroborated patterns of phoretic behavior in the laboratory. Taken together, these results establish that phoresy is a behavior functioning specifically for dispersal. The hypothesis that pseudoscorpion transport by other arthropods is accidental, motivated by hunger, and occurs because pseudoscorpions are incapable of consuming their hosts is rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beier, M. (1948). Phoresie und Phagophilie bei Pseudoscorpionen.Oesterreich. Zool. Z. 1: 441–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J. C., and Malcolm, D. R. (1960). The occurrence of false scorpions in caves with special reference to cavernicolous adaptation and to cave species in the North American fauna.Am. Midl. Nat. 64: 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C. P. (1976). Phoresy among entomophagous insects.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21: 343–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J. (ed.), (1983).BMDP Statistical Software, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack, R. A., and Wilkinson, R. C. (1987). Phoresy byDendrochernes pseudoscorpions on Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) and Aulacidae (Hymenoptera) in Florida.Am. Midl. Nat. 117: 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1978). Evolution and diversity under bark. In Mound, L. A. (ed.),Diversity of Insect Faunas, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 154–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, H. E. (1977). Enabling mechanisms.Proc. XV Int. Entomol. Soc. 15: 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C. C. (1959).The Ecology and Distribution of the Pseudoscorpions of North-Central New Mexico, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, G. (1975). The possible significance of spermathecae in pseudoscorpions (Arachnida).Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 3: 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1968).Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E. E. (1975). Associations between mites and other arthropods in forest floor habitats.Can. Entomol. 107: 425–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E., and Muchmore, W. B. (1975). Pseudoscorpions phoretic on fireflies II.Fla. Entomol. 58: 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangin, R. L. (1979). Reproductive behavior of the cactus fly,Odontoloxozus longicornis, male territoriality and female guarding as adaptive strategies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 4: 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangin, R. L. (1984). Reproductive ecology of three cactophilic Diptera (Diptera: Drosophilidae, Neriidae, Syrphidae).Pan-Pacific Entomol. 60: 326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, R. (1979). Abnormal metamorphosis and arthropod evolution. In Gupta, A. P. (ed.),Arthropod Phytogeny, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 137–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. (1970). An analysis of dispersal in mites.Am. Nat. 104: 45–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, J. C., and Cross, E. A. (1975). Phoretomorph: A new phoretic phase unique to the Pyemotidae (Acarina: Tarsonemoidea).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68: 820–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchmore, W. B. (1971). Phoresy by North and Central American pseudoscorpions.Proc. Rochester Acad. Sci. 12: 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchmore, W. B. (1982). Pseudoscorpionida. In Parker, S. P. (ed.),Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchmore, W. B., and Alteri, C. H. (1974). The genusParachernes (Arachnida, Chelonethida) in the United States, with descriptions of new species.Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 99: 477–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A., and Stuart, R. A. (1976). Animal behavior as a strategy optimizer: Evolution of resource assessment strategies and optimal emigration thresholds.Am. Nat. 110: 1055–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D. (1986). The evolution of wing dimorphism in insects.Evolution 40:1009–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1985).Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, R. L., and Moser, J. C. (1976). Two new phoretomorphicSiteroptes from galleries of the southern pine beetle.Beitr. Entomol. Berlin 26: 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergh, W. F., and Lowe, C. H. (1977).Ecology of the Saguaro: II. National Park Scientific Monograph Series, No. 8.

  • Vachon, M. (1940). Remarques sur la phoresie des pseudoscorpions.Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 109: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, M. (1954). Nouveaux cas de phoresie chez les pseudoscorpions.Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 2: 572–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weygoldt, P. (1969).The Biology of Pseudoscorpions, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (1980).The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (1982). Genetic polymorphism for carrier preference in a phoretic mite.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 75: 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (1983). The effect of population structure on the evolution of mutualism: A field test involving burying beetles and their phoretic mites.Am. Nat. 121: 851–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, D. W. (1986).Ecological Factors, Pleiotropy, and the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in Chernetid Pseudoscorpions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, D. W., and Zeh, J. A. (1992a). Dispersal-generated sexual selection in a beetle-riding pseudoscorpion (in press).

  • Zeh, D.W., and Zeh, J. A. (1992b). Emergence of a giant fly triggers phoretic dispersal in the neotropical pseudoscorpionSemeiochernes armiger (Pseudoscorpionida: Chernetidae).Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. (in press).

  • Zeh, D. W., and Zeh, J. A. (1992c). On the function of harlequin beetle-riding in the pseudoscorpionCordylochernes scorpioides (Pseudoscorpionida: Chernetidae).J. Arachnol. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeh, D.W., Zeh, J.A. Failed predation or transportation? Causes and consequences of phoretic behavior in the pseudoscorpionDinocheirus arizonensis (Pseudoscorpionida: Chernetidae). J Insect Behav 5, 37–49 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049156

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049156

Key words

Navigation