Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical identification and behavioral characterization of male wing pheromone ofEphestia elutella (Pyralidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral and chemical evidence is presented for the identity of the male wing pheromone ofEphestia elutella (Hübner) and the role of this pheromone in courtship success is evaluated. Males with the forewing removed experienced a mating success rate less than half of that of either intact males or males that had only the wing gland area remaining of their forewings. GC-MS analysis and microchemical reactions indicated the presence of (E)-phytol and a series of saturated γ-lactones in a methylene chloride extract of the wings. Using an assay of female courtship behavioral response, (E)-phytol was found to evoke an intermediate level of response in females when presented alone, while the complete array of insect-derived γ-lactones produced no significant response. The combination of either γ-decalactone or γ-undecalactone with (E)-phytol in a 1∶2 ratio, however, elicited a female response equivalent to that produced by the unfractionated wing extract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, R. 1937. Bau and Funktion der Flügeldrüsen einiger Mikrolepidopteren.Z. Wiss. Zool. 150:1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beroza, M., andBierl, B.A. 1967. Rapid determination of olefinic position in organic compounds in microgram range by ozonolysis and gas chromatography.Anal. Chem. 39:1131–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beroza, M., andSarmiento, R. 1966. Apparatus for reaction chromatography: Instantaneous hydrogenation of unsaturated esters, alcohols, ethers, ketones and other compound types, and determination of their separation factors.Anal. Chem. 38:1042–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjostad, L.B., Linn, C.E., Du, J.D., andRoelofs, W.L. 1984. Identification of new sex pheromone components inTrichoplusia ni, predicted from biosynthetic precursors.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1309–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, J.W.K., Garwood, R.F., Jackman, L.M., Oskay, E., andWeedon, B.C.L. 1966. Carotenoids and related compounds. Part XIV. Stereochemistry and synthesis of geraniol, nerol, farnesol, and phytol.J. Chem. Soc. (C) 1966:2144–2154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, S.A., andLai-Fook, J. 1977. The hairpencils of the flour mothEphestia kuehniella.J. Zool. 181:377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettner, K., andSchwinger, G. 1982. Defensive secretions of three Oxytelinae rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1411–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, G.R. 1936. The scent glands of certain Phycitidae (Lepidoptera).Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. London 85:331–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.G. 1976. Courtship behavior of a phycitid moth,Vitula edmandsae.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69:445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.G. 1978. Morphology of the presumed male pheromone glands on the forewings of tortricid and phycitid moths.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71:423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G.G., andBrady, U.E. 1975. Courtship behavior of phycitid moths. I. Comparison ofPlodia interpunctella andCadra cautella and the role of male scent glands.Can. J. Zool. 53:813–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkanen, E., Moisio, T., andKarvonen, P. 1965. The mass spectra of some aliphatic lactones.Acta Chem. Scand. 19:370–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.F., Blum, M.S., andFalses, H.M. 1983. Defense in thrips: Forbidding fruitiness of a lactone.Science 220:335–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnoff, S.B., andVick, K.W. 1984. Male wing-gland pheromone ofEphestia elutella.J. Chem Ecol. 10:667–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J.R. 1982. Behavioral effect of a sex pheromone extracted from forewings of malePlodia interpunctella.Environ. Entomol. 11:378–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T.A. 1960. Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.Psychol. Bull. 57:318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J.J., andPettus, J.A. 1976. Isolation of freecis- andtrans-phytol from the red algaGracilaria andersoniana.Phytochemistry 15:1076–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Still, W.C., Kahn, M., andMitra, M. 1978. Rapid chromatographic technique for preparative separations with moderate resolution.J. Org. Chem. 43:2923–2924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, R.G., Partida, G.J., andWarner, D.N. 1968. Rearing stored-product insects for laboratory studies: Six species of moths.J. Econ. Entomol. 61:1237–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J.W., Happ, G.M., Araujo, J., andPateels, J.M. 1972. γ-Dodecalactone from rove beetles.Tetrahedron Lett. 46:4635–4638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willstätter, R., Schuppli, O., andMayer, E.W. 1919. Untersuchungen über Chlorophyll.Ann. Chem. 418:121–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phelan, P.L., Silk, P.J., Northcott, C.J. et al. Chemical identification and behavioral characterization of male wing pheromone ofEphestia elutella (Pyralidae). J Chem Ecol 12, 135–146 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01045597

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01045597

Key words

Navigation